- Apr 16, 2016
- 1,291
- 0
- 0
Angella Issajenko knows how it works. Coca-Cola rules. Ben found out the hard way who was special.
Tienus said:Today the WADA report about doping in Sochi will come out.
Interesting article:
https://www.rt.com/sport/351771-russia-ioc-wada-ethics-doping/
“I have to question on what authority the USA and Canadian Anti-Doping agencies prepared their letter and what mandate they have to lead an international call for a ban of another nation in the Olympic family,"
Tienus said:Today the WADA report about doping in Sochi will come out.
Interesting article:
https://www.rt.com/sport/351771-russia-ioc-wada-ethics-doping/
“I have to question on what authority the USA and Canadian Anti-Doping agencies prepared their letter and what mandate they have to lead an international call for a ban of another nation in the Olympic family,"
adamfo said:Russian Cycling actually seems to come out of the McLaren report quite well ! At the level of canoeing....
https://twitter.com/ringsau/status/755028477317787648/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
The report stated its three main findings:
1. The Moscow laboratory operated, for the protection of doped Russian athletes, within a state-dictated failsafe system, described in the report as the Disappearing Positive Methodology.
2. The Sochi Laboratory operated a unique sample swapping methodology to enable doped Russian athletes to compete at the Games.
3. The Ministry of Sport directed, controlled and oversaw the manipulation of athlete’s analytical results or sample swapping, with the active participation and assistance of the FSB, CSP, and both Moscow and Sochi Laboratories.
4. The same program was in place at the time of 2012 Olympics
BullsFan22 said:adamfo said:Russian Cycling actually seems to come out of the McLaren report quite well ! At the level of canoeing....
https://twitter.com/ringsau/status/755028477317787648/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
The report stated its three main findings:
1. The Moscow laboratory operated, for the protection of doped Russian athletes, within a state-dictated failsafe system, described in the report as the Disappearing Positive Methodology.
2. The Sochi Laboratory operated a unique sample swapping methodology to enable doped Russian athletes to compete at the Games.
3. The Ministry of Sport directed, controlled and oversaw the manipulation of athlete’s analytical results or sample swapping, with the active participation and assistance of the FSB, CSP, and both Moscow and Sochi Laboratories.
4. The same program was in place at the time of 2012 Olympics
So nothing new then?
BullsFan22 said:adamfo said:Russian Cycling actually seems to come out of the McLaren report quite well ! At the level of canoeing....
https://twitter.com/ringsau/status/755028477317787648/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
The report stated its three main findings:
1. The Moscow laboratory operated, for the protection of doped Russian athletes, within a state-dictated failsafe system, described in the report as the Disappearing Positive Methodology.
2. The Sochi Laboratory operated a unique sample swapping methodology to enable doped Russian athletes to compete at the Games.
3. The Ministry of Sport directed, controlled and oversaw the manipulation of athlete’s analytical results or sample swapping, with the active participation and assistance of the FSB, CSP, and both Moscow and Sochi Laboratories.
4. The same program was in place at the time of 2012 Olympics
So nothing new then?
BullsFan22 said:Tienus said:Today the WADA report about doping in Sochi will come out.
Interesting article:
https://www.rt.com/sport/351771-russia-ioc-wada-ethics-doping/
“I have to question on what authority the USA and Canadian Anti-Doping agencies prepared their letter and what mandate they have to lead an international call for a ban of another nation in the Olympic family,"
Now she is the 'spokeswoman' for 'clean sport?' I know a four year Olympic cycle can change things, but going from 2 or 3 minutes behind in a 5km race to within seconds? You see that in junior races where somebody may have just started skiing and struggles through their first year or two, but then gets good training, develops, learns the technique and gains more confidence. Beckie Scott was 23/24 in Nagano and 27/28 in Salt Lake. By the end of your U23 days, you should be well developed and what you see is what you get, unless you come from a poor country with no resources including solid coaching. Sure, Canada didn't have coaching or resources at the time (things have improved since then), but it's not like they were an 'exotic' country with no ski history. I wonder what exactly Torbjorn Karlsen (Scott's personal coach at the time) was coaching her? What did she do differently in 1998 to 2002? At least Legkov, one of the Olympic champions accused of doping in Sochi, had an extensive history, with good junior results and even better U23 (gold and silver in 2006), Tour de Ski titles, Holmenkollen 50 win, World Championship medals, WC distance overall title, world cup individual and team victories...Yes, it's unusual to see a nation sweeping a xc race, particularly at the Olympics, and at home, what's more, but the Norwegian women did exactly the same just one day before, sweeping the 30km almost 90 seconds ahead of 4th place. Where's the outrage there? Yes, women's xc these days is not as strong or deep as it was in years gone by, but these are still professionals who are well trained and have some legs and lungs on them.
Of course, we'll now hear of 'the Russians just don't want to take responsibility,' or 'the Russians are calling this a conspiracy and that it's political, etc, etc...'
I am starting to believe more and more that it's 100% political. The RUSOC head, is right. Scott wants to fight for clean sport, yet you hardly hear of her talking about anyone else besides the Russians, even though we've heard plenty of non-Russian doping stories over recent months/years. She is just a slightly less aggressive version of Paula Radcliffe.
ToreBear said:BullsFan22 said:Tienus said:Today the WADA report about doping in Sochi will come out.
Interesting article:
https://www.rt.com/sport/351771-russia-ioc-wada-ethics-doping/
“I have to question on what authority the USA and Canadian Anti-Doping agencies prepared their letter and what mandate they have to lead an international call for a ban of another nation in the Olympic family,"
Now she is the 'spokeswoman' for 'clean sport?' I know a four year Olympic cycle can change things, but going from 2 or 3 minutes behind in a 5km race to within seconds? You see that in junior races where somebody may have just started skiing and struggles through their first year or two, but then gets good training, develops, learns the technique and gains more confidence. Beckie Scott was 23/24 in Nagano and 27/28 in Salt Lake. By the end of your U23 days, you should be well developed and what you see is what you get, unless you come from a poor country with no resources including solid coaching. Sure, Canada didn't have coaching or resources at the time (things have improved since then), but it's not like they were an 'exotic' country with no ski history. I wonder what exactly Torbjorn Karlsen (Scott's personal coach at the time) was coaching her? What did she do differently in 1998 to 2002? At least Legkov, one of the Olympic champions accused of doping in Sochi, had an extensive history, with good junior results and even better U23 (gold and silver in 2006), Tour de Ski titles, Holmenkollen 50 win, World Championship medals, WC distance overall title, world cup individual and team victories...Yes, it's unusual to see a nation sweeping a xc race, particularly at the Olympics, and at home, what's more, but the Norwegian women did exactly the same just one day before, sweeping the 30km almost 90 seconds ahead of 4th place. Where's the outrage there? Yes, women's xc these days is not as strong or deep as it was in years gone by, but these are still professionals who are well trained and have some legs and lungs on them.
Of course, we'll now hear of 'the Russians just don't want to take responsibility,' or 'the Russians are calling this a conspiracy and that it's political, etc, etc...'
I am starting to believe more and more that it's 100% political. The RUSOC head, is right. Scott wants to fight for clean sport, yet you hardly hear of her talking about anyone else besides the Russians, even though we've heard plenty of non-Russian doping stories over recent months/years. She is just a slightly less aggressive version of Paula Radcliffe.
The fat text is something that I certainly don't agree with. Probably a lot of the other stuff too. Look I know it hurts. I know the first Russian defense mechanism is to say, "but what about?". Then it's on to the conspiracy theories.
The reason Russia is such a focus is that the problems have been so well known for so many years in Russia. A lot has been done to help Russia deal with it by helping set up an antidoping infrastructure like Rusada and the Moscow lab. But when it turns out the Russian government is using the resources of the state to subvert that same infrastructure, it's kinda unprecedented.
gooner said:WADA wants to ban them entirely from Rio.
My guess is that Tygart and other countries knew what was in this report when they called for this action a few days ago.
gazr99 said:Definitely disagree with U23 statement. How often have promising young rider who were junior champions turned out to do nothing in all sports. If there's a chance you regress stepping up to Olympic level despite your excellent pedigree, there's the chance you can mature as a person and athlete and really improve as you get older as you hit your prime
adamfo said:BullsFan22 said:adamfo said:Russian Cycling actually seems to come out of the McLaren report quite well ! At the level of canoeing....
https://twitter.com/ringsau/status/755028477317787648/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
The report stated its three main findings:
1. The Moscow laboratory operated, for the protection of doped Russian athletes, within a state-dictated failsafe system, described in the report as the Disappearing Positive Methodology.
2. The Sochi Laboratory operated a unique sample swapping methodology to enable doped Russian athletes to compete at the Games.
3. The Ministry of Sport directed, controlled and oversaw the manipulation of athlete’s analytical results or sample swapping, with the active participation and assistance of the FSB, CSP, and both Moscow and Sochi Laboratories.
4. The same program was in place at the time of 2012 Olympics
So nothing new then?
I was glad to see some soccer players on the list. They seem untouchable but PEDs are commonplace and testing lax . Heck even ping pong players have failed tests.
ToreBear said:@Bullsfan22
Sure
BullsFan22 said:ToreBear said:@Bullsfan22
Sure
I would love to give my name here, to prove to you that I am not Russian, but giving out personal information on a forum these days is not something I would want. I can message you, or any other way you'd like.
BullsFan22 said:gazr99 said:Definitely disagree with U23 statement. How often have promising young rider who were junior champions turned out to do nothing in all sports. If there's a chance you regress stepping up to Olympic level despite your excellent pedigree, there's the chance you can mature as a person and athlete and really improve as you get older as you hit your prime
You can mature, but from the 60's to Olympic medals?
JetSet said:Russia just simply hasn't moved on since the fall of communism, cheating is deeply ingrained and until there's a change of regime they'll just deny everything. It is fairly clear that Russia has been cheating at state level since the late 1960's, they weren't the only ones, all of the other Eastern European countries were at it too, The GDR were the absolute masters of cheating their way to Olympic medals. I'm sure Russia will kick and scream and remind us all they have nuclear weapons but a 12 month ban from all international sport should send out a message that cheating won't be tolerated. I'd say the same if any other country had a state sponsored doping program.
Pete
gazr99 said:BullsFan22 said:gazr99 said:Definitely disagree with U23 statement. How often have promising young rider who were junior champions turned out to do nothing in all sports. If there's a chance you regress stepping up to Olympic level despite your excellent pedigree, there's the chance you can mature as a person and athlete and really improve as you get older as you hit your prime
You can mature, but from the 60's to Olympic medals?
Yeah prime example would be Jamie Vardy in football and whilst not as drastic Marcus Willis who was a club tennis player, and only in the last year or so has started being serious about how he trained and got to the 2nd round of Wimbledon
JetSet said:Russia just simply hasn't moved on since the fall of communism, cheating is deeply ingrained and until there's a change of regime they'll just deny everything. It is fairly clear that Russia has been cheating at state level since the late 1960's, they weren't the only ones, all of the other Eastern European countries were at it too, The GDR were the absolute masters of cheating their way to Olympic medals. I'm sure Russia will kick and scream and remind us all they have nuclear weapons but a 12 month ban from all international sport should send out a message that cheating won't be tolerated. I'd say the same if any other country had a state sponsored doping program.
Pete
JetSet said:Russia just simply hasn't moved on since the fall of communism, cheating is deeply ingrained and until there's a change of regime they'll just deny everything. It is fairly clear that Russia has been cheating at state level since the late 1960's, they weren't the only ones, all of the other Eastern European countries were at it too, The GDR were the absolute masters of cheating their way to Olympic medals. I'm sure Russia will kick and scream and remind us all they have nuclear weapons but a 12 month ban from all international sport should send out a message that cheating won't be tolerated. I'd say the same if any other country had a state sponsored doping program.
Pete