I've always been a Froome fan, but this win looked like a motor win. He has never showed anything like that before.
Saw the same thing. But I have to rewatch it to find out. What we did there wasn't human. It was more bizarre than Cancellara's classics season in 2010.Pantani Attacks said:Anyone else notice the sketchy alternation of hands around the bars towards the end? Screamed of pushing some sort of button/device to me.
you don't lie on monday but not on tuesday.T_S_A_R said:He has just been asked if it was planned.
He says it wasn't. Presumably that was the first time he had pedalled in that manner......
T_S_A_R said:He has just been asked if it was planned.
He says it wasn't. Presumably that was the first time he had pedalled in that manner......
LeindersGains said:Saw the same thing. But I have to rewatch it to find out. What we did there wasn't human. It was more bizarre than Cancellara's classics season in 2010.Pantani Attacks said:Anyone else notice the sketchy alternation of hands around the bars towards the end? Screamed of pushing some sort of button/device to me.
Where are the thermal detectors when you need them?
And could you pedal at that speed? And in that awkward position? Even with a 54 t chainring I think it would not be possible to get any benefit. Just askingHawkwood said:LeindersGains said:Saw the same thing. But I have to rewatch it to find out. What we did there wasn't human. It was more bizarre than Cancellara's classics season in 2010.Pantani Attacks said:Anyone else notice the sketchy alternation of hands around the bars towards the end? Screamed of pushing some sort of button/device to me.
Where are the thermal detectors when you need them?
Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit. Also what `wasn't human' about it? The position is a common one, pedalling in that position apparently isn't novel, and the speeds he hit 80-90 KPH are easily achievable on a descent. When I was younger and a bit more flexible I could hit 81KPH on a local descent that's just 700m long.
Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit.
veganrob said:And could you pedal at that speed? And in that awkward position? Even with a 54 t chainring I think it would not be possible to get any benefit. Just askingHawkwood said:LeindersGains said:Saw the same thing. But I have to rewatch it to find out. What we did there wasn't human. It was more bizarre than Cancellara's classics season in 2010.Pantani Attacks said:Anyone else notice the sketchy alternation of hands around the bars towards the end? Screamed of pushing some sort of button/device to me.
Where are the thermal detectors when you need them?
Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit. Also what `wasn't human' about it? The position is a common one, pedalling in that position apparently isn't novel, and the speeds he hit 80-90 KPH are easily achievable on a descent. When I was younger and a bit more flexible I could hit 81KPH on a local descent that's just 700m long.
Tienus said:Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit.
What if he used he hub motor that puts out less watts than a spindle motor. It will increase your top speed when in aero tuck but does not produce enough power to hold of a chasing group. Its also nice that it can produce power when you are not pedalling.
If you doubt about the existence of such motors I suggest you watch the Hesjedal crash.
veganrob said:And could you pedal at that speed? And in that awkward position? Even with a 54 t chainring I think it would not be possible to get any benefit. Just askingHawkwood said:LeindersGains said:Saw the same thing. But I have to rewatch it to find out. What we did there wasn't human. It was more bizarre than Cancellara's classics season in 2010.Pantani Attacks said:Anyone else notice the sketchy alternation of hands around the bars towards the end? Screamed of pushing some sort of button/device to me.
Where are the thermal detectors when you need them?
Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit. Also what `wasn't human' about it? The position is a common one, pedalling in that position apparently isn't novel, and the speeds he hit 80-90 KPH are easily achievable on a descent. When I was younger and a bit more flexible I could hit 81KPH on a local descent that's just 700m long.
veganrob said:And could you pedal at that speed? And in that awkward position? Even with a 54 t chainring I think it would not be possible to get any benefit. Just askingHawkwood said:LeindersGains said:Saw the same thing. But I have to rewatch it to find out. What we did there wasn't human. It was more bizarre than Cancellara's classics season in 2010.Pantani Attacks said:Anyone else notice the sketchy alternation of hands around the bars towards the end? Screamed of pushing some sort of button/device to me.
Where are the thermal detectors when you need them?
Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit. Also what `wasn't human' about it? The position is a common one, pedalling in that position apparently isn't novel, and the speeds he hit 80-90 KPH are easily achievable on a descent. When I was younger and a bit more flexible I could hit 81KPH on a local descent that's just 700m long.
sniper said:So Brailsford says "Froome has had the most bike checks", and next minute the headlines read "Froome has had the most bike checks".
Man, I give up.
Amazing, innit.BYOP88 said:Lance also had the most tests, go figure.sniper said:So Brailsford says "Froome has had the most bike checks", and next minute the headlines read "Froome has had the most bike checks".
Man, I give up.
sniper said:Amazing, innit.BYOP88 said:Lance also had the most tests, go figure.sniper said:So Brailsford says "Froome has had the most bike checks", and next minute the headlines read "Froome has had the most bike checks".
Man, I give up.
Lance's tricks and PR strategies are still up to date. Goes to show literally nothing has changed since he got busted.
sniper said:So Brailsford says "Froome has had the most bike checks", and next minute the headlines read "Froome has had the most bike checks".
Man, I give up.
Mayo from Mayo said:sniper said:Amazing, innit.BYOP88 said:Lance also had the most tests, go figure.sniper said:So Brailsford says "Froome has had the most bike checks", and next minute the headlines read "Froome has had the most bike checks".
Man, I give up.
Lance's tricks and PR strategies are still up to date. Goes to show literally nothing has changed since he got busted.
Come on, the UCI sent them an email for being the most cooperative team with the testers. Nothing to see here!
Interesting that according to Cycling News it was a British (unnamed) journalist who brought this up. A plant perhaps?
Hawkwood said:Also bizarre that he gained time on the descent where a motor would have been of little use, but lost time on the flat where using a motor would have provided the most benefit. Also what `wasn't human' about it? The position is a common one, pedalling in that position apparently isn't novel, and the speeds he hit 80-90 KPH are easily achievable on a descent. When I was younger and a bit more flexible I could hit 81KPH on a local descent that's just 700m long.
In an interview on Monday, Varjas said that his crank-assist devices could produce more than 250 watts, the amount of power a professional rider might typically average during a four-hour race. The smaller hub-assist motors, which he makes only for custom orders, typically produce only about 25 watts, he said, and require the rider to be able to maintain a high pedaling rate as is the case with all professionals. Even a 25-watt boost would be significant during a professional race.
Varjas said his system was nearly silent and light enough to keep a bike at the cycling union’s minimum weight.
“If you have this system, you can stay with the group, but nobody hears it, nobody sees it, nobody knows about it,” he said of the devices, which cost 10,000 to 25,000 euros (about $11,300 to about $28,200), depending on features.
While Varjas said that some professionals and teams used the motors for training — sometimes as a substitute for pacing at high speeds behind a motorcycle — he said that he did not know if the motors were also used in races for cheating. But he added that he believed that some kinds of carbon fiber, the material used to make pro bikes, could render the technology invisible to the cycling union’s new screening devices.
Varjas said that many of his customers who merely relied on the device to keep cycling were reluctant to offer endorsements.
“It’s a very strange market,” Varjas said. “No one will say they have this kind of bike.”