Teams & Riders Nairo Quintana discussion thread

Page 195 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 20, 2012
53,904
44,287
28,180
Re: Re:

PatrickLeeds said:
Red Rick said:
Not surprised if he really was ill during the Tour. However, recurring virus, and massive amounts of antibiotics. Solid journalism.

I noticed that too - 'He has had this virus twice before.Give him antibiotics! Why are they not working?'

Three possibilities -
we need a better translation,
he needs a better doctor,
or he needs a better excuse-writer.

Probably just normal/mainstream that somewhere along the way somebody calls antivirals antibiotics. Still it really gets on my nerve. Though I've heard of cases where doctors actually do try to treat viral infections with antibiotics, I refuse to believe that would be the case in this setting. Too much money involved to have doctors that crappy.
 
Aug 4, 2014
2,370
260
11,880
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
Probably just normal/mainstream that somewhere along the way somebody calls antivirals antibiotics. Still it really gets on my nerve. Though I've heard of cases where doctors actually do try to treat viral infections with antibiotics, I refuse to believe that would be the case in this setting. Too much money involved to have doctors that crappy.
I've had doctors just prescribe antibiotics prophylactically in order to avoid an opportunistic infection or even a piggybacking virus. In 99% of cases it seems like counterproductive overkill but for someone doing a 3,500km bike race under crap conditions it might not be the worst of ideas. But I'm not a doctor. And it does seem a little daft. But, again, I'm not a doctor.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,904
44,287
28,180
It's not described like it's prophylaxis in here. Not to mention that if you're at risk for opportunistic infections, you definitely don't belong in the TdF. What could have been the case, is that they just didn't do diagnostics and weren't sure what it actually was. Really not something you should be doing, but it seems plausible with all the pressure to perform in a TdF.
 
Jul 4, 2016
242
26
9,080
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
PatrickLeeds said:
Red Rick said:
Not surprised if he really was ill during the Tour. However, recurring virus, and massive amounts of antibiotics. Solid journalism.

I noticed that too - 'He has had this virus twice before.Give him antibiotics! Why are they not working?'

Three possibilities -
we need a better translation,
he needs a better doctor,
or he needs a better excuse-writer.

Probably just normal/mainstream that somewhere along the way somebody calls antivirals antibiotics. Still it really gets on my nerve. Though I've heard of cases where doctors actually do try to treat viral infections with antibiotics, I refuse to believe that would be the case in this setting. Too much money involved to have doctors that crappy.
A lot of the time they don't have (at least they used to not have) quick definitive tests to pinpoint a virus or bacteria. So they would treat for bacteria with the anti-bacteria even though it probably was a virus, and there were no anti-virals. Doing stuff like that has done its part in hastening bacteria mutations against the meds.

The point being they well could have given him anti-bacterials from a doctor's order, or the doctor thinking that is what the patient expected.
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Exactly.
When I'm coming down with something, I'm usually able to get antibiotics from the doctor if I want to, even when the test for bacterial infection comes back negative. There are two reasons for that:

1. Even if it's a virus, it weakens the body making it more susceptible to bacterial infections too. Better hand the antibiotics over right away doc I'm under pressure with important deadlines and I'll just self administer when the bacterial infections strikes, as it surly will. Or pass the meds on to others.
2. Armstrong's tests came back negative 500 times but it was all wrong. Can't trust a negative. Doctors tend to be on the rational side and agree.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,904
44,287
28,180
That's rationale is absolutely ridiculous, and one of the driving forces for impending public health disaster. Better safe than sorry is an absolute non-issue when talking about antibiotic use. There's a very good reason they don't hand carbapenems out like candybars for example. There's more and more emphasis and guidelines on reducing the selective pressure of antibiotics and bacteria to keep the current treatments viable for as long as possible. Usually there's empirical treatment that should work in most cases, and reevaluate/ do additional diagnostics. In the case of chest infections however, empirical treatment is to do nothing and reevaluate a few days later. To link this all back to Quintana, he's not your average case in that he can't just rest and recover passively, nor is it likely that team doctors are under any sort of scrutiny regarding treatment they prescribe for minor illnesses, as they don't have to give a flying fudge about public health. So they just chug it in as a hail mary to hope the rider recovers more quickly and be more competitive in the Tour. And it isn't the problem if Quintana receives antibiotics, it's that its not an isolated case and the whole mentality behind it.
 
Aug 4, 2014
2,370
260
11,880
I think a thorough discussion of the subject would be best held in the clinic, but health concerns have historically been, at best, an ancillary issue for cycling doctors. Much less public health concerns.
 
Sep 17, 2015
104
0
0
Re:

carton said:
I think a thorough discussion of the subject would be best held in the clinic, but health concerns have historically been, at best, an ancillary issue for cycling doctors. Much less public health concerns.

C'mon, just becuase it's the discussion of medical treatment you can't wave it away with 'Clinic! Clinic!'

Suggesting Antibiotics as a 'Better Safe than Sorry' measure is just infuriating. But frankly I don't think that's the issue in this case. I am hoping it's the Journalistic example of the people who think they have 'a touch of Flu', 'cos it's either that, or really is just bad excuses from a rider who was simply not in form.

Pat
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,894
2,253
25,680
Why would cycling doctors be trigger-happy with the antibiotics, when antibiotics are known to have a short-term negative impact on performance?
 
Apr 4, 2010
2,440
25
11,530
SeriousSam said:
Exactly.
When I'm coming down with something, I'm usually able to get antibiotics from the doctor if I want to, even when the test for bacterial infection comes back negative. There are two reasons for that:

1. Even if it's a virus, it weakens the body making it more susceptible to bacterial infections too. Better hand the antibiotics over right away doc I'm under pressure with important deadlines and I'll just self administer when the bacterial infections strikes, as it surly will. Or pass the meds on to others.
2. Armstrong's tests came back negative 500 times but it was all wrong. Can't trust a negative. Doctors tend to be on the rational side and agree.

You do know that acting like that is what is will cause resistant bacteria to be a big problem in the future, right?
 
Jun 27, 2015
712
380
10,680
If doctors were really free to make impactful indipendent decisions on the riders, Quintana would have been sent home
They're told to manage more or less, diagnosing and treatment are incompatible with the Tour daily routine
 
Aug 3, 2015
22,743
10,688
28,180
Any news? I keep hearing he will attend the Vuelta and if he does, I must admit Im very sceptic about his shape..
 
Jan 21, 2014
127
0
0
there is a photo of nairo training with el bimbo sevilla and the uni-elm team on the roads of boyaca
so he is probably preparing fr the vuelta
 
Aug 3, 2015
22,743
10,688
28,180
Re:

Escarabajo said:
I will be surprise if he didn't go to the Vuelta after the results from the Tour.

It sure looks like he will, but the big question is how good he is. Has he recovered? I don't think so. Read a Spanish article that Moviestar posted where the doctor stated he needed to have 3 weeks of rest. Thats looking somewhat like bull, but his body was wasted in the end of the Tour, it was obvious he had nothing left and had to dig 110% deep just to hang on for as long as possible. I very much doubt its possible to recover and beat a fresh Contador, but lets see. One can only hope. Big question marks from Contador's two biggest rivals going in.
 
Jun 3, 2016
17
0
0
His form is a mystery. It all depends on, like you stated, if his body has recovered well the last weeks. Can't imagine that Movistar will let him start if he still feels tired. Wait and Hope - we will know soon enough.

Would be great to see him back in great shape though and polish away, by riding agressive, the image of 'wheelsucker' that he created during the Tour.
 
Sep 29, 2013
252
0
0
I expect a top 5 for quintana, maybe top 3. But we never know...

If he is ok, maybe he can do a little better than the Tour, where he disappoint me, but maybe it was because of being sick.
Quintana must take the next stape if he wants to win the tour one day. I strongly believe that if he cannot explode more in the mountains, it will be complicated to win.

I hope he can achieve a good result.
 
Dec 16, 2013
283
0
4,030
Re:

Valv.Piti said:
So, whats to expect guys?
Well, Nairo can reach the podium and achieve top 3 in all GT's, it's maybe symbolic but very important for his career and building 2017 with optimism, by ending this 2016 season with a sweet taste in mouth. History tells he was unlucky in this race so it's time to broke this bad karma. Only a single stage his really adapted to his caracteristics (stage 14) but now he seems to be in decent shape, so wait and see. He must also avoid any illness or disease trouble, he's often troubled by these problems (IMO health problems are his biggest weakness). He's actually in northen Spain to check some important stages (article in spanish) : http://ciclismoenasturias.com/nairo-quintana-me-gustaria-ganar-en-los-lagos/
 
Jan 23, 2016
2,505
4
11,485
Quintana would have gone pretty deep this Tour. A lot would depend on how his recovery was after the Tour.
Having said that, he generally recovers better than the rest of the GC guys historically. A long flat TT will leave him atleast 1.5 minutes down on Froome, a minute a Contador(?), which will be substantial amount to take back in the mountains.
Steep ramps which dont suit him as much as maybe Chaves, Froome.
If last year is anything to go by, his performance would not be amazing, but right up there.
 
Aug 3, 2015
22,743
10,688
28,180
Re: Re:

Isaak-Gabriel said:
Valv.Piti said:
So, whats to expect guys?
Well, Nairo can reach the podium and achieve top 3 in all GT's, it's maybe symbolic but very important for his career and building 2017 with optimism, by ending this 2016 season with a sweet taste in mouth. History tells he was unlucky in this race so it's time to broke this bad karma. Only a single stage his really adapted to his caracteristics (stage 14) but now he seems to be in decent shape, so wait and see. He must also avoid any illness or disease trouble, he's often troubled by these problems (IMO health problems are his biggest weakness). He's actually in northen Spain to check some important stages (article in spanish) : http://ciclismoenasturias.com/nairo-quintana-me-gustaria-ganar-en-los-lagos/

He has been hampered by health problems in the Giro 2014, Vuelta 2015 and Tour 2016. In 2014 and 2016 he was close to pulling out of these GT's, in Vuelta 2015 he was at one point dropped in the flat and was obviously way below par in Andorra, probably the most obvious example. He might actually have been able to win that Vuelta considering the level.

So yes, I'd also say its one of his biggest weaknesses, if the not biggest weakness. He is always able to pull through and deliver good results, but as I have stated earlier in this thread (I remember a big argument), his body seems very fragile for some reasons, unknown for us.

If he has recovered, I expect him to fight for the win. Nothing short but that should be expected if he indeed has recovered which we hope.