That's an excellent post, and I hope to comment on it, and some other developments later today.
I think that Kaep misses open receivers because he is looking for the running lane first. I think that RG III CAN be a better NFL QB than Kaep, and likely be a top 16 QB in the correct system with the correct guidance.Alpe d'Huez said:As to Kaep, I'm not going to dig up the post, but back when the 49ers first started playing him I repeated an evaluation that was made on him in college. He did not make quick enough reads through his progressions before making decisions and would often not see what he liked, and take off and run. He didn't change much when he got to the NFL. Though until teams adapted, he got away with it. It was really Baltimore (with Lewis and Suggs playing LB) in that Super Bowl that burst that bubble and put an end to his free reign. He didn't have a bad game, but not the game many expected, and they rightfully lost. As to his windup, he may never be Philip Rivers, but I don't think it's that big of an issue compared to the other ones he has. Other QBs with slow deliveries have done fine in the NFL, it's his decision making is what needs to change. Put another way, he's not Aaron Rodgers, and he never will be. But he needs to get his head around seeing the field and looking into the empty spaces where his receivers are going to be open better.
As to Brady's appeal, what a load of crap. I can't believe the NFL is still going through with this. Goodell's ego must still be really hurt. I'll say what I did before, this should have been an equipment tampering penalty during the game (15 yards from the next play from scrimmage), and a fine for each ball determined tampered with. That's it. To accuse one of the best players in NFL history of being a cheater and liar, and seeking to suspend him the same amount as wife beaters, based on the theory that he was "generally aware" of balls being deflated is absurd.
jmdirt said:I think that Kaep misses open receivers because he is looking for the running lane first. I think that RG III CAN be a better NFL QB than Kaep, and likely be a top 16 QB in the correct system with the correct guidance.Alpe d'Huez said:As to Kaep, I'm not going to dig up the post, but back when the 49ers first started playing him I repeated an evaluation that was made on him in college. He did not make quick enough reads through his progressions before making decisions and would often not see what he liked, and take off and run. He didn't change much when he got to the NFL. Though until teams adapted, he got away with it. It was really Baltimore (with Lewis and Suggs playing LB) in that Super Bowl that burst that bubble and put an end to his free reign. He didn't have a bad game, but not the game many expected, and they rightfully lost. As to his windup, he may never be Philip Rivers, but I don't think it's that big of an issue compared to the other ones he has. Other QBs with slow deliveries have done fine in the NFL, it's his decision making is what needs to change. Put another way, he's not Aaron Rodgers, and he never will be. But he needs to get his head around seeing the field and looking into the empty spaces where his receivers are going to be open better.
As to Brady's appeal, what a load of crap. I can't believe the NFL is still going through with this. Goodell's ego must still be really hurt. I'll say what I did before, this should have been an equipment tampering penalty during the game (15 yards from the next play from scrimmage), and a fine for each ball determined tampered with. That's it. To accuse one of the best players in NFL history of being a cheater and liar, and seeking to suspend him the same amount as wife beaters, based on the theory that he was "generally aware" of balls being deflated is absurd.
I still agree with you about the low psi balls. The refs blew it, and the NFL has really blown it.
jmdirt said:P. Manning might be announcing his retirement Monday...
Kaep? I'll just keep tossing his name until it sticks somewhere!Alpe d'Huez said:Things brings up the next question. Who is the Jets QB for this coming season? They won't be able to draft anyone capable of starting on day 1 unless they hit the Russell Wilson type jackpot. Is Bryce Petty ready to compete?
Amsterhammer said:"God bless all of you, and God bless football".
Jesus wept.
That's a corny, cliche statement for sure, but grotesque? All of the big money athletes (actors, musicians, CEOs, trust funders, etc...as well) have a distorted view of their place in the big picture.Maxiton said:Amsterhammer said:"God bless all of you, and God bless football".
Jesus wept.
Seriously. That was the most grotesque thing I've seen in some time. Say what you will about NFL, they've got the market cornered in grotesque.
HMM, if Osweiller jumps, does Den look at RGIII? He's not really Elway's kind of QB, but maybe he could develop with that organization. At first I really thought that he was going to Dallas, but as time passes I think the chances are getting less. Since I said I would keep tossing Kaep out until he sticks, does Den look at him? I don't think that Brees is a good option. I think that Elway should be trying hard to keep Osweiller. He is as good or better than the available options (known options anyway--ie: there might be a Russell Wilson in the draft), he is already part of the team and knows the system.Alpe d'Huez said:I wouldn't say it's grotesque either. But it is about as sappy and hokey as John Elway telling the crowd "I love you" after winning the Super Bowl. But so be it.
It looks like Murray has landed very quickly in Tennessee in a trade. It looks like Philly is cleaning up after Chip. Both Kiko Alonso and Byron Maxwell were quickly dealt to the Dolphins.
Houston seems to be pushing hard for Brock Osweiller, which has to give Denver some pause, with so few (as in no) quality QBs up for grabs. John Elway likes big names, but I'm not sure where he goes to get one? Trade more of the future for Drew Brees? I'm not sure they can afford him, even after PM's departure.
Bruce Irvin is testing the waters and will get plenty of bites. Early talk is Arizona, but expect Atlanta to give him a good look too, as he reportedly got along very well with Dan Quinn and wanted to play for him again. Though I believe it was Gus Bradley who first worked with him, so I wonder what Gus thinks about him coming to Jax?
Lots of talk of RG3 in Dallas, but it's far from done.
I don't get it from either side.52520Andrew said:Brock Osweiler getting a 4 year 72 million dollar deal to go to Houston. Lots of money
MAYBE, Denver could be a good landing place for Kaep. When he first took over for Smith, he was really focused on playing from the playbook, while adding his scrambling to the mix. He read the headlines about him being a running QB, so he ran more. His play helped SF to the big game, BUT he started to look for running lanes first, and then see where the receivers ended up...too late, now all he had left was rapidly closing running lanes. So if Knapp and Dennis can coach him up, he can be a top 20 QB, maybe even top 10 next year. Is PM hanging around to help out?Alpe d'Huez said:Holy smokes on Osweiller leaving Denver. Wow. After all that time spent grooming him, Denver let him walk away. Talk is that they are looking at Kaepernick now, which is a really risky option. They're also looking at Mike Glennon, which is a peculiar pick. Glennon wasn't known for poor mistakes, but he never showed the ability to throw the ball down the field with any accuracy either. He's also under a nice contract as the back-up on Winston in Tampa, and I don't think the Bucs want to let him leave. I'm curious if or why not, Elway hasn't talked to Fitzpatrick.
Oakland still needs DL (and maybe OL) help, but adding Bruce Irvin to an already stout LB core is a really nice grab. He is going to love playing with Mack, and Mack likely the same in return, as it allows him to move more freely when he sees blocking assignments he likes on passing downs. Irvin is also familiar with Ken Norton Jr, who is the DC for Oakland.
Williams may shine in Miami, playing next to Suh.
Gee, John. If that were true what the crap did you offer Osweiller a contract for?"We've stayed true to our philosophy of building a team with players who want to be Denver Broncos and want to be here."
I think the Bruce Irvin move to the Raiders is a win-win-win deal. A win for Oakland (teaming with Mack), a win for Bruce financially, and a win for Seattle. Huh, for Seattle you say? Well, Hawks have about $35M cap space before Irvin and Mebane's (to SD) departures, but that is not near the huge cap space Oakland has (guessing in the $50-$60M range). Irvin is pretty athletic, but he's not as explosive off the edge since he put on bulk, and he's just average in coverage and often gets picked on in short pass routes. Seattle was not going to pay $9M/year for that. Seattle did not use him as an every down player, so maybe he will benefit from extra reps in Oakland if they give him more snaps.Alpe d'Huez said:Oakland still needs DL (and maybe OL) help, but adding Bruce Irvin to an already stout LB core is a really nice grab. He is going to love playing with Mack, and Mack likely the same in return, as it allows him to move more freely when he sees blocking assignments he likes on passing downs. Irvin is also familiar with Ken Norton Jr, who is the DC for Oakland.