I think that's a valid concern about QB injuries, though at least half sounds like a high number. As a Raider fan, I'll honestly be really surprised if Jimmy Garappolo plays all 17 games. Since the Raiders didn't think Jarett Stidham would get a good offer on the market and let him walk, they are stuck with Brian Hoyer, and rookie Aiden O'Connell if/when JG gets hurt - a serious drop-off in talent.
I remember back a decade ago when Peyton Manning played like 1 series in the pre-season, and some people were questioning that decision. Even last year several teams rested QBs the entire preseason, and the numbers showed some rust. 3 won, 8 lost.
Winners: Kirk Cousins, Justin Herbert, and Lamar Jackson.
Losers: Aaron Rodgers, Derek Carr, Matthew Stafford, Kyler Murray, Dak Prescott, Russell Wilson, Joe Burrow, Ryan Tannehill.
Almost every stat was lopsided favoring QBs who played in the preseason, over those who didn't. Even those who only played a few series. As to the Raiders, they went 4-0 in the preseason (3 + HOF game), and both Jarett Stidham and Chase Garbers made the offense look like they were humming. When Derek Carr started week 1, he promptly threw three interceptions, forced numerous balls, digging the team into a deep hole with the entire offense looking out of whack. But for many players, maybe it was well worth the risk, to insure the QB is healthy.
I can see two things on the horizon though for this injury issue and long, difficult seasons:
• QBs starting to play like Tom Brady did the last few years, where when he comes close to getting hit, he either throws the ball into the dirt at the nearest receiver's feet, and/or he just crumples to the ground before being really hit taking a sack.
• Teams stacking good backups on their team, and planning on them playing more strategically, which doesn't just mean more garbage time. I can see teams resting starting QBs for entire half's of games, or entire games if they are injured at all, and the team is favored to win a game, or face a serious pass rush defense, and are willing to risk a loss just to survive. This is more likely now that the NFL can carry a 3rd "emergency" QB all the time.
This will increase even more once the league goes to 18 games - next year is my guess. It can end up a bit like the NBA, where teams and players see zero value in "ironman" players, and some stars only play 60 odd games in an 82 game season - which ticket paying fans despise.
Chip Kelly, who wasn't the best NFL coach, said he liked to have a back-up QB who was a starter. Basically two starting QBs on his team. People chalked it up to an NCAA coaching mindset, but he had a point.
Yes, I think slightly less of Sean Payton than all the experts out there. Good coach, not great coach. Drew Brees was a big reason they won all those games, won the SB. That and a good OL and defense for most of those years. Same with Brady in NE, Manning in Indy, the list goes on. Excellent coaches can often mask limited talent, work with what they have (Carroll with Wilson is a good example), but more often than not it's the player who does the work and makes the coach great, more than the other way around. Flip this around and a bad QB can easily get a coach fired. Again, Sean is good. But I don't see him being a miracle worker for Russell Wilson, who to me is about at the end of his shelf life. Maybe I'm wrong and they will dominate. We'll see.