Newsflash. Brian Cookson, british cycling, to stand against Pat McQuaid (SUI) for uci

Page 15 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
del1962 said:
UCI Management Commitee

President

Mr Pat McQUAID IRL


Vice-Presidents


Mr Hee Wook CHO KOR
Mr Renato DI ROCCO ITA
Mr Artur LOPES POR

Members


Mr Mohamed Wagih AZZAM EGY
Mr José Manuel PELAEZ CUB
Ms Tracey Gaudry AUS
Mr Sheikh Faisal Bin Humaid AL QASSIMI UAE
Mr Brian COOKSON GBR
Mr David LAPPARTIENT FRA
Mr Mohamed Jamel LOUAFI TUN
Mr Igor Viktorovich MAKAROV RUS
Mr Peder PEDERSEN DEN
Mr Mike PLANT USA


Coopted Member

Mr Joop ATSMA NED


Honorary President

Mr Hein VERBRUGGEN NED


Honorary Vice-presidents

Mr Ray GODKIN AUS
Mr Vladimir HOLECEK CZE
Mr Agostino OMINI ITA


The accusation is that Plant & Makarov (both dodgy) are the pupper masters behind Cookson.

Maybe not puppetmasters exactly, but enthusiastic supporters? Cookson has made the UCI good money both with landing Sky, and now the follow-on UCI sanctioned events that have suddenly appeared. So, he probably commands a certain respect.

I wonder if the UCI Management member from the UAE is how they set up the shell corporation there.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
DirtyWorks said:
Maybe not puppetmasters exactly, but enthusiastic supporters? Cookson has made the UCI good money both with landing Sky, and now the follow-on UCI sanctioned events that have suddenly appeared. So, he probably commands a certain respect.

I wonder if the UCI Management member from the UAE is how they set up the shell corporation there.

Simple question - how much money, when you say "good money' did the UCI receive??
 
Cookson on UCI v Kimage

Cookson squealing, saying he cannot comment because it is a legal matter, is just pap for the idiots. Cookson was on the management committee during this time and if we stop the clock at the end of January this year, we have Cookson saying: "I am 100% supportive of Pat McQuaid"
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news...okson-i-am-100-supportive-of-pat-mcquaid.html
So that is after Lance has confessed on Oprah. He still thinks McQuaid is the guy to back ! Now he has gone all 180 on us and is pretending to be a knight in shining armor, he wants us to forget what he was like and forget that he had 9 years to do something since LA confidential came out and has just played the deaf dumb and blind kid. Even at the end of Jan he was saying there was no place for a minimum wage for women. Another thing he has done a 180 on.

The guy is a lifetime local government official. He has flipped and flopped through the whole of his life, just looking for the opportunity to advance himself. The only thing he believes in, is saying the right thing for the moment, to advance Cookson. Pat is obviously a joke. Cookson will be better than Pat but as Brailsford would have Fran tell us, this is no quantum change, the improvement is barely discernible. Exactly like one of the reasons that Sky are so much better than everyone else, their wheels are rounder - a marginal gain.

In terms of identifying the rogues, Yates, de Jong, Sutton, Barry and Leinders etc., who Brailsford was bringing in under his nose, where he was one of a 3 strong management committee to oversee affairs at Sky, I will use Jack Regan's line of a fellow cop who had snaked his way up the greasy pole to near the top, "He (Cookson) couldn't find an Irishman in a Clover Club".

Brailsford is no fool. Neither is McQuaid.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Freddythefrog said:
Cookson squealing, saying he cannot comment because it is a legal matter, is just pap for the idiots. Cookson was on the management committee during this time and if we stop the clock at the end of January this year, we have Cookson saying: "I am 100% supportive of Pat McQuaid"
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news...okson-i-am-100-supportive-of-pat-mcquaid.html
So that is after Lance has confessed on Oprah. He still thinks McQuaid is the guy to back ! Now he has gone all 180 on us and is pretending to be a knight in shining armor, he wants us to forget what he was like and forget that he had 9 years to do something since LA confidential came out and has just played the deaf dumb and blind kid. Even at the end of Jan he was saying there was no place for a minimum wage for women. Another thing he has done a 180 on.

The guy is a lifetime local government official. He has flipped and flopped through the whole of his life, just looking for the opportunity to advance himself. The only thing he believes in, is saying the right thing for the moment, to advance Cookson. Pat is obviously a joke. Cookson will be better than Pat but as Brailsford would have Fran tell us, this is no quantum change, the improvement is barely discernible. Exactly like one of the reasons that Sky are so much better than everyone else, their wheels are rounder - a marginal gain.

In terms of identifying the rogues, Yates, de Jong, Sutton, Barry and Leinders etc., who Brailsford was bringing in under his nose, where he was one of a 3 strong management committee to oversee affairs at Sky, I will use Jack Regan's line of a fellow cop who had snaked his way up the greasy pole to near the top, "He (Cookson) couldn't find an Irishman in a Clover Club".

Brailsford is no fool. Neither is McQuaid. Cookson, on the other hand, is.
Back in January McQuaid was willing to co-operate with the Independent Investigation.

And also, as I pointed out earlier his "100% supportive" comment came a day after a the Daily mail splashed "British Cycling's Cookson emerges as UCI contender if McQuaid resigns over Armstrong doping scandal".
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Dr. Maserati said:
Back in January McQuaid was willing to co-operate with the Independent Investigation.

And also, as I pointed out earlier his "100% supportive" comment came a day after a the Daily mail splashed "British Cycling's Cookson emerges as UCI contender if McQuaid resigns over Armstrong doping scandal".

McQuaid was 'saying' he was willing, but who believes he would have, given his history of letting Armstrong back early and trying to hide Contador's positive.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Benotti69 said:
McQuaid was 'saying' he was willing, but who believes he would have, given his history of letting Armstrong back early and trying to hide Contador's positive.

I wouldn't have - but no better way to make sure then to let it play out.

Either McQs lies get exposed or he does some desperate act - which is what happened.
Also, the examples that you give you only found out this week, Cookson in June.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Freddythefrog said:
Cookson was on the committee that approved the terms of reference for the investigation. Those terms were what did for that investigation. It was never going to investigate anything. when it met and then asked the UCI to extend its terms, that it when the plug was pulled. If Cookson had any, he would have never been party to the formation of the investigation under the constraints with which it was constructed. Cookson is not Omerta, he is just too dull to realise.

See this is where you are confusing stuff by attributing everything under the words UCI.

The Mgt Comm set up the Commission - but it was McQuaid and the lawyers who killed it, nothing to do with the Management Committee.

The terms of reference would have uncovered enough - but rightly it was pointed out by CCN etc that it needed to be extended.
 
Jul 7, 2012
509
0
0
McQuaid is sounding confident, as well he might given all the support he has bought from the non-traditional cycling nations by providing them with funds for 'development'. (Funds that the UCI bled from McQuaid's hated 'European mafia nations'.)

Pat McQuaid expects ‘quick’ return to cycling's hot seat

Controversial UCI president has come under fire for Armstrong doping scandal among other things, but insists he's confident of re-election
Wednesday, 11 September, 2013, 5:34am

Agence France-Presse in Buenos Aires

Cycling chief Pat McQuaid insists he is confident that now he has been cleared to be a candidate he will be re-elected easily as president of the International Cycling Union (UCI) later this month.

The 64-year-old Irishman - who has been president for eight years - has faced a vitriolic assault on him since the other candidate, Englishman Brian Cookson, entered the race in early June.

McQuaid has been attacked for many things including his handling of the Lance Armstrong doping scandal.

However, he has fought back in a battle with Cookson - whom he once thought of as an ally having brought him into the UCI - that has become increasingly personal.

After first the Irish and then the Swiss withdrew their nominations, it was not even sure at one point if McQuaid would be able to present himself for re-election. Finally the Moroccan federation stepped in to nominate him.

The UCI executive board cleared his nomination and McQuaid, present in Buenos Aires for the International Olympic Committee Session, said he couldn't wait for the vote.

"I am confident once I get to Florence I will win it quickly," he said. "I have globalised the sport over the past eight years, taken it to Asia and South America. The presidents of the federations on those continents know me, I know them and they acknowledge what I have done.

"Why have the opposition been trying to derail me? Because they wanted a coronation not an election."

McQuaid said he could not be faulted over his attitude to tackling doping.

"Over the eight years I've been in charge I have developed the most advanced anti-doping policy," he said. "I have introduced biological passports, and have spent 7.5 million Swiss francs [HK$63 million] a year on tackling doping."

McQuaid said there was no way he could have swept the Armstrong scandal under the carpet. "First of all I had nothing to do with the Armstrong case as all his Tour de France wins were before I took over," he said.

"I read his book and the way he described his cancer and how he had looked death in the eyes. I couldn't believe a guy who had experienced that would afterwards put poisons in his body."

However, having initially said Armstrong had no place ever again in cycling McQuaid says he could do provided he fulfilled one obligation. "I want a commission ... where cyclists come before it and confess to what they have done, in order to help us to move forward. If Armstrong was to come before them then he can play a role."

McQuaid, though, said that those cyclists still active who confess to doping to the commission would have to take their punishment. "Brian Cookson has said there can be amnesties but there can be none as under World Anti-Doping Agency [Wada] rules you have to have at least a six-month ban," he said.

McQuaid said he had made important enemies, such as Igor Makarov, a Russian oligarch who had taken offence at his team Katusha being excluded from the elite teams for this season. They later won a court case to be reinstated. "He's been after me ever since," he said.

Makarov has already dismissed allegations that he is orchestrating Cookson's bid for the UCI presidency.

Of Cookson's candidacy, McQuaid said: "I was surprised because Brian made statements supporting me in January and February acknowledging the difficulties I had faced, the pressures I was under and the changes I had made in eight years."

http://www.scmp.com/sport/other-spo...cquaid-expects-quick-return-cyclings-hot-seat
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
mcquaid and verbruggen still have enough to fight for.
mcquaid needs to be in charge in order to keep the lid on.
who knows verbruggen is distributing brown envelopes behind the scenes as we speak. i assume verbruggen is a lot wealthier than cookson.
 
May 26, 2009
460
0
0
WHEN did the UCI Executive board have the ability to change the UCI Constitution ?

For phat the rat to be " nominated " by the Executive board , they NEED that Authority ! When were the constitutional rules changed ?

Thought i was reading " alice thru the looking glass when i saw " robert21's " comment !
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
sniper said:
mcquaid and verbruggen still have enough to fight for.
mcquaid needs to be in charge in order to keep the lid on.
True - and not only is trying to keep the skeletons in the closet he is also fighting to keep a livelhood for him as well as his family.

As someone else pointed out to me, it he loses he has little chance of getting a cushy sports consultants job or let hang around Aigle like Hein did.

His sons Andrew & David and his brother as well as other members of the family are all tied in too. With maybe the exception of Andrew, the rest only remain relevant because of who they know.

sniper said:
who knows verbruggen is distributing brown envelopes behind the scenes as we speak. i assume verbruggen is a lot wealthier than cookson.
Watch this space.
 
Jul 7, 2012
509
0
0
Does anyone have any ideas why McQuaid's comments / the UCI's decision have not been more widely reported, especially in the cycling press? After all, the original report comes from Agence France-Presse, and so would have been circulated globally.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Dr. Maserati said:
True - and not only is trying to keep the skeletons in the closet he is also fighting to keep a livelhood for him as well as his family.

As someone else pointed out to me, it he loses he has little chance of getting a cushy sports consultants job or let hang around Aigle like Hein did.

His sons Andrew & David and his brother as well as other members of the family are all tied in too. With maybe the exception of Andrew, the rest only remain relevant because of who they know.


Watch this space.

McQ has been milking cycling for a long time. I would guess he is a wealthy man by now.
 
May 26, 2009
460
0
0
orbeas said:
Any ideas on who is running this blog ????

http://mcquaidvscookson.wordpress.com/

Brian Cookson has a blog also !

Difference is , the above is a study of ANY op. to denigrate Cookson , whilst the Brian Cookson effort reports activities .

Depending on which side you wish to stand , as to what value you place on the verbiage of each ?

Meanwhile i am still awaiting replikes to my tweets 6 emails to Cookson , not holding my breathe ,
 
Aug 30, 2012
152
0
0
What does it say that the depth of his current well involves relying on feds such as those from Barbados and Malaysia?

McQuaid is an easy guy to beat on for probably a few dozen reasons, but if we remove all those cycling-specific angles from the equation and just look at the human aspect of all this...is it possible to be any more shameless? Just unreal.
 
Jul 7, 2012
509
0
0
del1962 said:
Still needs 2/3 of delagates to approve it though

Thing is, McQuaid knows full well that, come to a vote, very many delegates from nations outside the traditional cycling countries will vote for him. This is largely because he has bought their favours with money for 'development' as part of his plans to 'globalise' cycling. Ironically these funds have been drained from the very 'mafia European nations' whose influence McQuaid has sought to undermine over the years, especially 'The French' who McQuaid plainly hates. (Recall how he jumped on Armstrong's disgraceful 'It's a French conspiracy' bandwagon when evidence first came to light proving he was a doper, not to mention his many Francophobic comments over the years.)

That McQuaid has not been forced from office itself shows how powerful his grip on power is. Question is if (or even when) he does win what will the response of the wider world of cycling be? Perhaps the best we can hope for is that the main organisers such as the ASO, the pro teams and others cry 'enough is enough' and break away from the UCI.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
JV must be pretty sure St. Cookson is winning, otherwise that heart warming love letter might come back and bite him in the ***.
 
EnacheV said:
Than answer the why-i-would-vote-for-mcquaid question

The scared rabbits that think Sky winning TdF would continue. I have a news flash for you, they will continue or stop regardless of who is running the UCI.

I have news for you, i dont give a fcuk even if they for another ten years. I enjoy it.