Hagen wins this by the length of the straight - There were even times when the commentators didn't recognise in a reduced group of 12 or 13.
But he got a stage top-10.
Hagen wins this by the length of the straight - There were even times when the commentators didn't recognise in a reduced group of 12 or 13.
Kelderman actually had a 5th place on stage 17, but that got missed out on updates (now corrected in my post above), so he doesn't meet that criterion.I think the Zubeldia award should be won by the guy on that list whose best stage result is higher than his final GC position. I think there's something special about that.
Hagen OUT!
Btw, is it actually possible (or even likely) to WIN Grand Tour being a Ninja? Probably yes, e.g. if breaks are always allowed to have their stage wins (and TT is and flat enough, so the winning ninja climber has no chance for TOP10).
If this Vuelta had been cancelled after 8 stages it would have happened.Btw, is it actually possible (or even likely) to WIN Grand Tour being a Ninja? Probably yes, e.g. if breaks are always allowed to have their stage wins (and TT is and flat enough, so the winning ninja climber has no chance for TOP10).
What are the chances of that happening?If this Vuelta had been cancelled after 8 stages it would have happened.
It establishes that it is possible to be in the lead while still ninja: the later in the race it is, the more possible. Maybe I should have put "It would have happened if the last 13 stages had all finished in group sprints."What are the chances of that happening?![]()
I still don't know what Hagen looks like, he was so invisible.You could simply say it's the rider who sneaked into the GC top 10 in the least conspicuous manner. In that case it would be Hagen. I will have to look up his first name.
Here's a shot of him so you can recognize him in the future:I still don't know what Hagen looks like, he was so invisible.