- Apr 10, 2019
- 12,079
- 15,996
- 23,180
The Swiss, the Germans, the French and Sweden all hard great skis. Things seem a lot more even after the Fluor ban.
the Swiss have had the best ski all week, at least going by what Nadine Fähndrich said. But to see Cyril up there was obviously still a massive surprise - I was more thinking about Klee to have an ouside shot maybe.The Swiss, the Germans, the French and Sweden all hard great skis. Things seem a lot more even after the Fluor ban.
It looks to be tricky conditions today, so I expect big ski differences. I wouldnt be very confident about my skis if I was Diggins and Brennan, in my memory the Americans are among the ones that more often have troubles on conditions like this.
The short lap in Val di Fiemme just sucks, it took a thermonuclear Klaebo to create legit gaps here in 2022.
The short lap in Val di Fiemme just sucks, it took a thermonuclear Klaebo to create legit gaps here in 2022.
Snow tomorrow might make the race a lot harder on those slopes...Too bad they barely had any snow just a couple days ago, otherwise I think they could have used a 5km loop and it would have been a much better test.
I didn’t watch the races, but It seems that the snowfall had an impact again, as one would expect. No way Diggins hangs on and loses so little on a race like today, on a course where she’s lost 1:30 (and when it was only 10km). Too bad that Davos and now Val Di Fiemme are impacted by snow.. looking at the forecast, tomorrow may be ad well.
First of all, Diggins is much better in classic this season than previous years. She’s made a huge step forward in her diagonal technique.I didn’t watch the races, but It seems that the snowfall had an impact again, as one would expect. No way Diggins hangs on and loses so little on a race like today, on a course where she’s lost 1:30 (and when it was only 10km). Too bad that Davos and now Val Di Fiemme are impacted by snow.. looking at the forecast, tomorrow may be ad well.
First of all, Diggins is much better in classic this season than previous years. She’s made a huge step forward in her diagonal technique.
Second, the fact she has lost 1:30 on this course previously means a lot less than what she has shown in other classic races this year. It’s been times where she’s been doing this race in bad form (like the last two years), it’s been times when her skis has been bad and it’s been times where she’s just not been good enough. The “not good enough” part has she clearly solved this year, with stable strong classic performances in most races.
In many ways it reminded me of a sprint stage in cycling, of which I rarely watch anything but the finish.Awful, brick-through-the-TV spectacle.
FIS are happy though because they got what they wanted.
I think we have our answer about Manificat, even if todays race wasn't the best judge he finished 6th of the French team. To his credit he finished ahead of Chanavat and I fully expect him to do so again tomorrow as well (irony intended).I mean, he’s 37 now, I don’t know what he expects to get from racing the world cups, if he even qualifies to make the French team.
Sure, she was in fine form and had no problems during the Tour de Ski last year when she got beaten with 4 and a half minute overall. You probably think she was in normal good form that Tour just because she had the fastest time in the chasing start in Oberstdorf where she skier in a massive pack (11 girls finished together) and didn’t do very bad in the final climb.She was in fine form the last two years. Others were just better.
Claudel and Laukli are really good bets for tomorrow. Together with Weng and Diggins they are clearly the most likely top 3.All in for Claudel and Laukli tomorrow. It's the only thing that can save this absolute s**t-show of a race.
Edit: well, or Eiduka getting on the podium, because I'd mark out like anything for that, but I think that's a bit too far-fetched.
If i remember correctly she paced really bad last year and lost a lot in the last part, so if she gets the pacing right she should do a lot better with the same physical level. However, she doesn’t strike me as a very tactical skier, so it wouldn’t surprise me if she does the same mistake tomorrow. But she definitively have huge potential for this stage.As a lightweight, Bergane should be a contender as well, I guess. Hard to say how much she has improved since last year, though.
Yea, the Eiduka pick is very much a heart over head thing. I'm a big fan of hers. I think Claudel and Laukli are the main stage threats and are more realistic "outsider" winners (in that they are not people who typically threaten World Cup wins but their skillset and build particularly suits this stage), over Weng (she hasn't shown the kind of form to suggest she will win, but I'll never write her off since historically she's the second best climber of the mountain after Johaug). Diggins is an outside bet but I think she'll be more interested in managing the Tour overall GC lead than the stage so not risk going into the red chasing the likes of Claudel or Laukli for whom this is absolutely the kind of day their season is built around.Claudel and Laukli are really good bets for tomorrow. Together with Weng and Diggins they are clearly the most likely top 3.
Eiduka, it will be hard for her to get a podium tomorrow. I'm thinking about 5-8. In the overall she should be able to pass Hennig (only 4 seconds ahead) and maaybe Parmakoski if Krista isn't that motivated, but even if she pass those two Claudel is only 21 seconds behind, so it will be very difficult for her to reach a top 10. But this tour has been good for her after a though season start. 3 top 15s (should be 4 after tomorrow) and likely a 11th or 12th place in the overall is pretty good. And I think we will see an (even) better version of her in the last half of the season.
I'm still not 100% convinced Sophia has recovered fully from being sick over the holidays; Claudel has looked a step above her most of the Tour IMHO (though hoping Sophia has just been skiing smart and not digging too deep..). Sophia needs to get to the bottom of the climb with Delphine; last year she was not well positioned and it cost her.Yea, the Eiduka pick is very much a heart over head thing. I'm a big fan of hers. I think Claudel and Laukli are the main stage threats and are more realistic "outsider" winners (in that they are not people who typically threaten World Cup wins but their skillset and build particularly suits this stage), over Weng (she hasn't shown the kind of form to suggest she will win, but I'll never write her off since historically she's the second best climber of the mountain after Johaug). Diggins is an outside bet but I think she'll be more interested in managing the Tour overall GC lead than the stage so not risk going into the red chasing the likes of Claudel or Laukli for whom this is absolutely the kind of day their season is built around.
I bet Liz Stephen wishes they did this stage as a mass start when she was active. She was always my favourite American skier before, and used to set top 3 times on the Alpe regularly, but when it was done as a pursuit so it would often be off camera. Laukli has rather taken her mantle both in terms of skillset and in terms of my affections, and this stage affords her the chance to show herself at the head of the pack with the mass start.
An intervalstart with start list where overall leader starts at last and one minute gap between every skier (maybe even put 2 minute for the last 10) could work well. Kind of a copy of the Giro stage to Monte Lussari.Imo the Tour lacks a skating individual start, so just make Alpe Cermis an individual start.
I think the Alpe Cermis stage works best as a mass start; just (IMHO) much more exciting to see who wins the stage outright and I like seeing the pure climbers get their day in the sun. I'm with Eddy E regarding his idea of a balanced Tour route.Imo the Tour lacks a skating individual start, so just make Alpe Cermis an individual start.
