- May 29, 2011
- 3,549
- 1,651
- 16,680
It have more or less every year created proper gaps on the womens side, especially the last two years when the women also did 15 km.The short lap in Val di Fiemme just sucks, it took a thermonuclear Klaebo to create legit gaps here in 2022.
I dont agree that the sprint bonus seconds have been as important as you imply. The sprint bonus seconds in Davos got very well washed away in the chasing start the following day.So we are going to have a Tour entirely settled by sprint bonus seconds and the Alpe Cermis hillclimb.
Unfortunately, that's basically the dream as far as FIS is concerned, because that makes for "balance". The fact that makes it easier for somebody from a market they're openly courting (hey, they need to replace those Russian audience numbers) to win is just a bonus.
But the thing is, the pursuit start was set by the sprint, so while the gaps may have been washed away, a mass start or an individual start would see gaps created by the skiing on the day, not artificially set by the sprint. The Toblach one is less of an issue because it was set on the sprint AND the individual start, but the Davos one was a complete joke.I dont agree that the sprint bonus seconds have been as important as you imply. The sprint bonus seconds in Davos got very well washed away in the chasing start the following day.
The sprint bonus seconds in Toblach would’ve been a lot more worth if stage 3 was a mass start and not a chasing start also.
The overall format is just totally geared towards Klaebo. They removed the Alpe Cermis pursuit and all skating individual starts (where he's at his weakest) and have Bonus seconds only in Sprints and the Val di Fiemme mass start bonus sprint (pretty much his favourite race alongside the Ruka individual start).I dont agree that the sprint bonus seconds have been as important as you imply. The sprint bonus seconds in Davos got very well washed away in the chasing start the following day.
The sprint bonus seconds in Toblach would’ve been a lot more worth if stage 3 was a mass start and not a chasing start also.
The Davos one was actually an incentive to bottle the sprint to save some energy.But the thing is, the pursuit start was set by the sprint, so while the gaps may have been washed away, a mass start or an individual start would see gaps created by the skiing on the day, not artificially set by the sprint. The Toblach one is less of an issue because it was set on the sprint AND the individual start, but the Davos one was a complete joke.
I agree that the concept of having a chasing start based on a sprint is a joke, but my view is that this format make the athletes doing well in sprint being the ones that are loosing time because of this stupid format.but the Davos one was a complete joke.
And GC pursuits punish the people for doing well in the overall...Pursuits have to be gc pursuits, the simple stage pursuits only punish people for doing well the previous day.
when you look at the results of the women's sprint quali and the likes of Niskanen, Stadlober, Weng and Hennig just outside the top 30, that would appear to be true.The Davos one was actually an incentive to bottle the sprint to save some energy.
I think there are three different reasons as to why cross country skiers are likely to be more careful to compete sick compared to biathletes:
1) First of all is a biathlon race less hard on the body. Because you need to be able to have steady legs to shoot on, the biathletes have to ski slightly more controlled on all loops before the last loop and this combined with the "rest" they get shooting, the load on the central system is a bit smaller than racing a cross country race.
2) Second is that if you are slightly sick and you believe that your body is reduced and can not perform at 100% level, the physical part is only one of two parts that is important in a biathlon race. If you are 30-35 seconds slower in the skiing part of a 10 km biathlon race you can still get a better result with good shooting than you do sometimes in 100% form but with bad shooting. In cross country when you are physically limited that will hinder you from reaching a "normal" result.
3) In biathlon the overall world cup result seems to be valued higher (not only the win, but also for top 3, top 5, top 10 etc) and the point system have always been pushing the athletes to take part in every race. In cross country they changed to a similar point system before last season, so this huge benefit from participating in basically every race. Some norwegian athletes in XC have complained about this new system because they feel it encourages atheletes to race when sick because you get quite a lot of points even from a bad race.
--
Then there is also huge differences between different countries. Norwegian and Swedish athletes have in general a much lower limit for when they are dropping out. So with a light cold a Norwegian or Swedish athlete will likely drop out, while a German, French, Swiss or Italian athlete with the same symptoms likely will start like nothing have happened. From the Central European point of view the Scandinavians are "weak", from a Scandinavian point of view the Central Europeans are stupid taking unnecessary risk with their health competing sick.
(this is of course generalized, there are also Scandinavian athletes that take risk and compete sick, like Jakob Ingebrigtsen did during athletics WC in the summer)
On the other hand there are no skating individual starts for her, an in shape Diggins obliterates the rest in a skating individual start in Toblach.when you look at the results of the women's sprint quali and the likes of Niskanen, Stadlober, Weng and Hennig just outside the top 30, that would appear to be true.
Not really sure how the format is not suited to Diggins when it rewards skate sprints, gives big bonuses for them, and the only meaningful classic after day 2 is in a mass start format on short loops with a long descent back into the stadium that helps her negate her losses.
Gc pursuits are often a bit more tactical in the casing group, nobody wants to lead too much.And GC pursuits punish the people for doing well in the overall...
If the Davos pursuit had been a GC pursuit, that would've been crazy unfair with such conditions and it basically would've nullified all four races before and not only the sprint the day before.
Pursuits needs to be removed from the tour.
It's not like it's "not suited to Diggins". It's more like is not perfect for Diggins. For example would it be much better for her if the two chasing starts had been masstarts, because the bonuses from the sprint races would be worth much more with that setup.Not really sure how the format is not suited to Diggins when it rewards skate sprints, gives big bonuses for them, and the only meaningful classic after day 2 is in a mass start format on short loops with a long descent back into the stadium that helps her negate her losses.
That is such a weird story.Justine Braisaz skiing to make sure Julia Simon can't get anywhere near her pockets.
This makes this morning's women's race look like Johan Olsson in 2013.Oh well, snowfall in a mass start race on the sorry ass 3.75 km course in Val di Boring. Might as well watch paint dry on a wall.
Looks like I didn't miss anything by going to clean my driveway from the snow.Oh well, snowfall in a mass start race on the sorry ass 3.75 km course in Val di Boring. Might as well watch paint dry on a wall.
