kurtinsc said:
Lance is a jerk and he's a doper.
But I fail to see the logic in excusing other dopers who happen to be nice guys to focus on smashing lance.
I've said it before... I'll be very annoyed if the end result of this is to destroy a bunch of US cyclists but guys like Valverde or Contador get to keep riding. Doping is prevalent, and I'll be okay with this if the whole lot of them get smashed by it... but not of only the guys from my country go down but all the others get a free pass.
I'm nationalistic enough to like to see US riders do well. If this gets pursued and Contador is still riding... I'm going to be a bit annoyed.
I never said it was logical. But it's part of human nature. I don't see this is as an American vs the world type of thing.
My thoughts on doping are that they are very likely all doing it in the European protour. there have been enough people who went to Europe as juniors or development squads and came back because doping was not an option, it was required.
I think the 'Fall of Lance' may actually be secondary to the UCI essentially 'selling the right to dope' to teams that could afford it which essentially put poorer teams at a huge disadvantage.
If true, the allegations make world wide wrestling look pretty tame because at least wrestling doesn't try and portray the outcome as the result of competition.
Remember Milli Vanilli? The fact that some songs were not sung by the act was a known fact, but the crud didn't hit the fan until they won the grammy for it. Lance is parlaying it into an empire built on lies, fraud, deceit, bullying and several other disgusting traits. I understand your reaction to the fact that others do it and are not reacted to like Lance, but really when it comes to being a dikc, are they anywhere close to him?
I am not arguing it's rational, (because it's not) I am just telling you why it is.