- Aug 18, 2012
- 1,171
- 0
- 0
gooner said:Greg is on Anderson Cooper later. An extract below from it.
http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2...ance-champ-greglemond-speaks-wandersoncooper/
Pulling no punches.
gooner said:Greg is on Anderson Cooper later. An extract below from it.
http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2...ance-champ-greglemond-speaks-wandersoncooper/
I'd be p!ssed off too if someone had my livelihood destroyed, slandered my name in the media, had their fans send intimidating messages, offered money for proof of me doping etc etc.red_flanders said:Wow, that's pretty intense. People are going to think he's a bit unhinged.
42x16ss said:I'd be p!ssed off too if someone had my livelihood destroyed, slandered my name in the media, had their fans send intimidating messages, offered money for proof of me doping etc etc.
I think people are starting to forget WHY Lemond and Armstrong hate each others guts. I also think that there is a fair number of people who never knew at all, just look at the comments section of todays CN article.
It seems a percentage of the fanboys are getting over their disappointment![]()
red_flanders said:Wow, that's pretty intense. People are going to think he's a bit unhinged.
DirtyWorks said:Why? It's true.
The money made on pure fraud alone makes it criminal.
Well LeMond hates LA and with plenty of justification. Why wouldn't you wish the worst on your sworn enemy. Personally I find his attitude refreshing. Sure it's good when some swine gets a bit of comeuppance but sometimes it's not enough.red_flanders said:Wow, that's pretty intense. People are going to think he's a bit unhinged.
Landis decided it was time, finally, to send his e-mail to Johnson, copying a small number of officials from USA Cycling and the UCI. On Friday, April 30, 2010, at about 6:20 in the evening, he hit the send button on the 1,080- word e-mail, which portrayed the US Postal team for what it was: a sports team with a sophisticated doping program, with Armstrong at its center, the ringleader.
ChewbaccaD said:From CN's excerpt from the book:
Lance Armstrong does deserve jail time for what he did. Too bad somebody got to somebody, and the case against him was dropped.
Neworld said:GL has always spoken the truth, now he has his rightful audience. Good for him.
NW
Neworld said:Every dog has his day...Lancey will have many months of it in jail.
GL has always spoken the truth, now he has his rightful audience. Good for him.
NW
Was it a hoax or fraud?DirtyWorks said:Why? It's true.
The money made on pure fraud alone makes it criminal.
MarkvW said:"Many months in jail" is wishful thinking.
42x16ss said:I'd be p!ssed off too if someone had my livelihood destroyed, slandered my name in the media, had their fans send intimidating messages, offered money for proof of me doping etc etc.
I think people are starting to forget WHY Lemond and Armstrong hate each others guts. I also think that there is a fair number of people who never knew at all, just look at the comments section of todays CN article.
It seems a percentage of the fanboys are getting over their disappointment![]()
D-Queued said:Yes. You are right.
Poor Lance won't get that wish. He may yet face years instead of months.
Dave.
DanielsDad said:Was it a hoax or fraud?
What is the criminal act? I didn't see one stated by Lemond. "Ruining lives" is not a crime. Nor is "not even in the top 30". All those that think there was a crime should stick to the same talking points - fraud - and focus on why Lance should be charged while others are not.
I was one of those kids that also thought wrestling was real. Those that wrestled all faked it for monetary gain and I was duped (so kinda meets the definition of fraud), and I don't think they are criminals. Because some 30 to 200 cyclists did/do the same thing and one does it more makes it a difficult fraud case IMO. That he is a bad guy and ruins lives too, does not make it a crime automatically.
DanielsDad said:Was it a hoax or fraud?
What is the criminal act? I didn't see one stated by Lemond. "Ruining lives" is not a crime. Nor is "not even in the top 30". All those that think there was a crime should stick to the same talking points - fraud - and focus on why Lance should be charged while others are not.
I was one of those kids that also thought wrestling was real. Those that wrestled all faked it for monetary gain and I was duped (so kinda meets the definition of fraud), and I don't think they are criminals. Because some 30 to 200 cyclists did/do the same thing and one does it more makes it a difficult fraud case IMO. That he is a bad guy and ruins lives too, does not make it a crime automatically.
MarkvW said:Lance delivered controlled substances, he conspired to deliver controlled substances, he defrauded USPS. He did lots of criminal stuff! Problem is that his conspiracy worked too well. His co-conspirators didn't start snitching him off until years after the USPS transaction had concluded.
I think that the case just got too old for the feds to criminally prosecute. Others here impute improper motives to the federal government. Still, it's quite wrong to suggest that Lance didn't commit any crimes.
Dr. Maserati said:Hmmm, but Mark none of his co-conspirators snitched.
Not sure what you mean by that, obviously not Floyd or anyone, because doping is not a crime, so it can't be him.....
While IMO LA should not (& will not) see jailtime for doping, intimidation of witnesses and obstructing justice could come back at him yet.
MarkvW said:Forget Floyd for a second. Hincapie, the omerta-enforcer was obviously a co-conspirator.
Possession of steroids is a crime. Possession of EPO without a prescription is a crime. Delivery of either is a crime. Conspiring to deliver either is a crime.
MarkvW said:Forget Floyd for a second. Hincapie, the omerta-enforcer was obviously a co-conspirator.
Possession of steroids is a crime. Possession of EPO without a prescription is a crime. Delivery of either is a crime. Conspiring to deliver either is a crime.
Why?BroDeal said:I feel sad for Daniel.
42x16ss said:It seems a percentage of the fanboys are getting over their disappointment![]()
DanielsDad said:Assuming this would be a USA court.
Specifically:
What crime can he be convicted of?
I am not an attorney, but try to use CSI kind of speak. "Ruining lives" does not count.