Official Lance Armstrong Thread: Part 3 (Post-Confession)

Page 207 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
D-Queued said:
Notwithstanding that Chewy chewses not to agree with this interpretation of 'that' and 'too', it does appear self-evident as you point out.

Chewing on this a bit further, while not chewsing favorites as I typically do chews Chewie, given George's renown for injesting and injecting, and given that he apparently cannot chews on his own, it would be interesting to know who influenced him when he was chewsing what else to put on his pharmaceutical shopping list. Can he give us an item-by-item accounting?

Just saying...

Of course, this ain't the GH thread. But I am curious, George.

(and apologies for chewsing to take the liberty with Chewy...)

Dave.

Dear Wiggo said:
Agreed



George Hincapie has ironic initials, innit?

If people don't agree with me, my plan for world domination is fu*ked...

Maybe people will chewse to follow my dictates if I chewse to lighten up a little?
 
Scott SoCal said:
Wrong question.

Why should Hincapie be speaking? That's a better question because it is clearly not in his best interests.

Me too, but you have to wonder what's in it for GH.

He speaks because he can. Whereas before he could not.

And no doubt he's supporting his friend Lance. No surprises there. Hardly a revelation that he wants to do so. And people like talking. Makes them feel better.

Just like others who support the A's and their position. They are friends.

End of the day they all doped. Some more than others. Some gained more. Some lost. Some gained then lost. Some lost then gained.

I'm not sure you're going to be able to pick winners and losers from this batch.

One thing is for certain Lance will go down hard. Financially he will be ruined one way or the other.

Nit picking his statements in the press just gives more power. Ignore him. Come Federal Court time I can assure you the judge won't be reading the Detroit Gazette to make his findings.

Frankie runs a team now. He's way up on the scales than either or those two buffoons.

Rustling around the garbage cans looking for ulterior motives when often all your find is garbage.

I don't think there's a lot to see here but some are chasing shadows.

As I said to my colourblind friend once;

"When I see red, what colour do you see?"

"Red" he said.

"But my red is different from your red" I replied.

"Perhaps, but it's still red".
 
Nov 8, 2012
12,104
0
0
thehog said:
He speaks because he can. Whereas before he could not.

And no doubt he's supporting his friend Lance. No surprises there. Hardly a revelation that he wants to do so. And people like talking. Makes them feel better.

Just like others who support the A's and their position. They are friends.

End of the day they all doped. Some more than others. Some gained more. Some lost. Some gained then lost. Some lost then gained.

I'm not sure you're going to be able to pick winners and losers from this batch.

One thing is for certain Lance will go down hard. Financially he will be ruined one way or the other.

Nit picking his statements in the press just gives more power. Ignore him. Come Federal Court time I can assure you the judge won't be reading the Detroit Gazette to make his findings.

Frankie runs a team now. He's way up on the scales than either or those two buffoons.

Rustling around the garbage cans looking for ulterior motives when often all your find is garbage.

I don't think there's a lot to see here but some are chasing shadows.

As I said to my colourblind friend once;

"When I see red, what colour do you see?"

"Red" he said.

"But my red is different from your red" I replied.

"Perhaps, but it's still red".

That's deep.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
thehog said:
He speaks because he can. Whereas before he could not.

And no doubt he's supporting his friend Lance. No surprises there. Hardly a revelation that he wants to do so. And people like talking. Makes them feel better.

Just like others who support the A's and their position. They are friends.

End of the day they all doped. Some more than others. Some gained more. Some lost. Some gained then lost. Some lost then gained.

I'm not sure you're going to be able to pick winners and losers from this batch.

One thing is for certain Lance will go down hard. Financially he will be ruined one way or the other.

Nit picking his statements in the press just gives more power. Ignore him. Come Federal Court time I can assure you the judge won't be reading the Detroit Gazette to make his findings.

Frankie runs a team now. He's way up on the scales than either or those two buffoons.

Rustling around the garbage cans looking for ulterior motives when often all your find is garbage.

I don't think there's a lot to see here but some are chasing shadows.

As I said to my colourblind friend once;

"When I see red, what colour do you see?"

"Red" he said.

"But my red is different from your red" I replied.

"Perhaps, but it's still red".

Perhaps you should ask

your colour-blind friend.

"why am I so green"?
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Not that I've had any free time for the past hour, :D but I really do want to frame this one.
Boeing said:
George, why wait until you are off the bike to attack anyone in the Peloton ? Where was this Nad grab at Roubaix?

Just another Sack Tap to LA....
 
Granville57 said:
That would imply that he has more to lose now, wouldn't it?

No because he's made his confession and it's now the new clean era of cycling.

Frankie is at the Tour reporting. Lance can't show his face. Wouldn't be allowed to show his face.

No one is going to be listening to Doepy George and Lance.

Camp Conspiracy can rest easy.

But Hincapie will retracting he words anytime soon, right? :rolleyes:
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
mewmewmew13 said:
Haven't we agreed yet that the issue here is timing? :D

or I'll come back later..
You stay right there, Kitty.


Granville57 said:
That fact alone that "Big George" is opening his mouth at all about this topic, just as this latest documentary is making the rounds, raises a red flag for me. I can't help but treat everything single thing the guy says with extreme skepticism.
Scott SoCal said:
ChewbaccaD said:
My issue is this: The confluence of statements by Lance and Hincapie regarding this issue. Nothing in Armstrong's history suggests that a coincidence like that is an innocent event. Nothing.

Dr. Maserati said:

DirtyWorks said:
The only thing left bothering me is the title of the article: "Hincapie claims there's more to Andreu's doping past" It's not "Hincapie reminisces about controversial days" or something gentler. It generates controversy where apparently there is none. Thus, giving credibility to the idea that the intent is discrediting the Andreau's.

Bing-f'cking-O
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
thehog said:
No because he's made his confession and it's now the new clean era of cycling.

Frankie is at the Tour reporting. Lance can't show his face. Wouldn't be allowed to show his face.

No one is going to be listening to Doepy George and Lance.

Camp Conspiracy can rest easy.

But Hincapie will retracting he words anytime soon, right? :rolleyes:

And camp water carriers can keep working furiously<--favorite word today

Anyway, RR will post again sooner or later, so you'll once again have your opportunity to disagree with anything he writes. Cool your jets little fella.
 
Aug 9, 2009
640
0
0
DirtyWorks said:

Interesting links, but not much new there for those familiar with PR - and did not do much to clarify the source of information regarding Mr. Race Radio's post.

Lance has been pushing this nonsense for months, that Betsy knew, Frankie was a pusher, Travis and JV are in bed together. He tell journalist to talk to George and VDV as they will confirm his rants. Until now George has just done his normal mumbling and the few things he would say were unconfirmable. None of the cycling journalists would run with it as they saw through it. This reporter, with little understanding of the facts, ran with it.

I believe that Dear Wiggo asked the following question:

Dear Wiggo said:
Do you have links for this, or do all cycling journalists email you whenever Lance tries to tell them stuff, alerting you to his behind the scenes shenanigans?

My guess is that this is Super Secret Insider Information where Mr. Race Radio cannot divulge his sources. That is OK with me if sources are not named. However, in the absence of any sources, my inclination is to take his claims with a very large sack of salt.

Your inclination may vary. The weight of the sack of salt may vary.
 
ChewbaccaD said:
And camp water carriers can keep working furiously<--favorite word today

Anyway, RR will post again sooner or later, so you'll once again have your opportunity to disagree with anything he writes. Cool your jets little fella.

I agree with RR.

Might point being why give rise to the statements of two guys who used to inject each other with EPO.

Rise above it. There was a time Lance would post in Vanity Fair.

Detroit? What the? Wound up by that?!

No conspiracy.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Sleep well, little Euros. The Clinic is always best after dark. :D



us-time-zones1.gif
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
thehog said:
I agree with RR.

Might point being why give rise to the statements of two guys who used to inject each other with EPO.

Rise above it. There was a time Lance would post in Vanity Fair.

Detroit? What the? Wound up by that?!

No conspiracy.

Bottles got a little heavy then?
 
Cal_Joe said:
Interesting links, but not much new there for those familiar with PR - and did not do much to clarify the source of information regarding Mr. Race Radio's post.



I believe that Dear Wiggo asked the following question:



My guess is that this is Super Secret Insider Information where Mr. Race Radio cannot divulge his sources. That is OK with me if sources are not named. However, in the absence of any sources, my inclination is to take his claims with a very large sack of salt.

Your inclination may vary. The weight of the sack of salt may vary.

ok NOW you're showing some respect!
MR RR to all of you

don't any of you think it might have something to do with ongoing legal wrangling?? ..I mean..any of you 'doubters' and 'sceptics'
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Cal_Joe said:
Interesting links, but not much new there for those familiar with PR - and did not do much to clarify the source of information regarding Mr. Race Radio's post.



I believe that Dear Wiggo asked the following question:



My guess is that this is Super Secret Insider Information where Mr. Race Radio cannot divulge his sources. That is OK with me if sources are not named. However, in the absence of any sources, my inclination is to take his claims with a very large sack of salt.

Your inclination may vary. The weight of the sack of salt may vary.

You guys have been trying to troll RR all day, and now you want to asalt him?

I guess it won't be wasted because you can use it for the chip on your shoulder.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Cal_Joe said:
My guess is that this is Super Secret Insider Information where Mr. Race Radio cannot divulge his sources.

Too bad he doesn't have a history stretching back many years, over different forums, where the information he provided—YEARS before most people even had a clue—turned out to be entirely accurate.

If only there was a track record of revealing what was very much "insider information" then we would have something to go on. :rolleyes:

Is Race Radio infallible?
Of course not.

Do I agree with everything he posts?
Nope.

Does he have a foundation built upon sharing information that turns out to be true that would also otherwise be completely unavailable to most people on this forum?
Yes. Absolutely.

You can pretend otherwise, of course.


But hey, don't take my word for it.

TexPat said:
As a former insider into all things Armstrong, I am still amazed by the level of knowledge that RR shows. This has not gone unnoticed by legions of followers, hired legal thugs and old Uniball himself (Hey Amigo!).
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Granville57 said:
Too bad he doesn't have a history stretching back many years, over different forums, where the information he provided—YEARS before most people even had a clue—turned out to be entirely accurate.

If only there was a track record of revealing what was very much "insider information" then we would have something to go on. :rolleyes:

Is Race Radio infallible?
Of course not.

Do I agree with everything he posts?
Nope.

Does he have a foundation built upon sharing information that turns out to be true that would also otherwise be completely unavailable to most people on this forum?
Yes. Absolutely.

You can pretend otherwise, of course.


But hey, don't take my word for it.

What would TexPat know...?

RR has nothing to prove, especially to a jilted fanboi.

Hey, I wonder why BPC hasn't created a new account to weigh in? I think maybe he's busy trying to get a vial of Wigans' ball sweat from a saddle or something.
 

Latest posts