- Jun 7, 2011
- 4,281
- 2,840
- 21,180
Cimacoppi49 said:It can run as long as the Justice Department thinks the investigation warrants it as long as they have an indictment within the statute of limitations.
Thanks for that.
Cimacoppi49 said:It can run as long as the Justice Department thinks the investigation warrants it as long as they have an indictment within the statute of limitations.
StyrbjornSterki said:One must presume at this point the Feds already have a knee-deep stack of sealed indictments, so the clock will have stopped running on those charges. But there is no requirement that all charges must be either brought or tried simultaneously, so I doubt their choice of timing for serving them would be influenced by the Aspen incident.
Unless RICO is among the charges to be brought. I can see where they would want to delay a RICO trial so that incident could be included.
i tentatively see your point and i hate to dog-pile, but didn't you claim to be firmly on the fence wrt mr armstrong ?JRTinMA said:Who claimed they weren't a fan? <snip>
Poursuivant said:Thanks for that. Must be torturous for Armstrong, no matter how nonchalant he claims to be, it would be on anyones mind. He says it has no bearing on his life, yet feels the need to taunt Novitzky via twitter. A part of him must be just wanting the indictments to come so he knows what he is up against.
Race Radio said:Look back through your own posts and even you will see the desperation.
Wonderboy is going to jail. It will be a slow motion train wreck and in the end it will not matter if the indictments were handed down at Thanksgiving, Easter, or Christmas
mewmewmew13 said:........
Poursuivant said:Thanks for that. Must be torturous for Armstrong, no matter how nonchalant he claims to be, it would be on anyones mind. He says it has no bearing on his life, yet feels the need to taunt Novitzky via twitter. A part of him must be just wanting the indictments to come so he knows what he is up against.
MarkvW said:We don't know what the charges are. We don't know what the proof is. We don't know who the judge is. It's been about sixteen months since the investigation began.
Reason has nothing to do with pretentious predictions that Armstrong will be indicted, convicted, or sentenced to time
MarkvW said:We don't know what the charges are. We don't know what the proof is. We don't know who the judge is. It's been about sixteen months since the investigation began.
Reason has nothing to do with pretentious predictions that Armstrong will be indicted, convicted, or sentenced to time
Race Radio said:Really?
We have 2, or more, saying Armstrong was a source of drugs
Multiple sources for evidence of a payoff and special access for cash (FCPA)
Evidence of millions of $$ in bank transfer to Ferrari
Multiple witness of taking drugs into Switzerland
Witness intimidation? Yeah we got that
Fraud? Yup, got that too
Bags of cash from Post Tour Crit's? Yup, got that
Qui Tam? Yeah, that is going good too.
All run by Doug Millar......highest conviction rate in the nation
At this point the better question would be what is the weakest part of the Government's case.
Velodude said:Also:
Money laundering & income tax evasion - private sales of (surplus and end of season) US Postal Trek bikes to fund team doping program (per F Landis).
Money laundering & income tax evasion #2 - alleged over invoicing of US Postal for purchases by conspiratorial third party to provide funds for doping program.
Undertaking medical procedures without a license.
Being in illegal possession of a clinical trial drug and transporting that drug over international borders.
There could possibly be Federal indictments made for bribery of UCI and/or UCI officials and the conduct of LAF charity if LA personally benefited from transactions that were statutorily required to be disclosed and were in breach of compliance requirements of a tax exempt charity.
python said:Troll babble
Race Radio said:Really?
All run by Doug Millar......highest conviction rate in the nation
At this point the better question would be what is the weakest part of the Government's case.
move on fanboy, i asked 4 questions to an obsessed poster using his own words. nothing wrong with being a fanboy except pretending you are not and getting angry when faced with the truth.JRTinMA said:fanboy babble.
to the bolded - THAT in my opinion is the likeliest cause for the long time it takes. several posters with legal experience explained the intricacies in the 'legal' thread. i also think that novi and miller realize that moving too fast in a complex case would be counterproductive.StyrbjornSterki said:One must presume at this point the Feds already have a knee-deep stack of sealed indictments, so the clock will have stopped running on those charges. But there is no requirement that all charges must be either brought or tried simultaneously, so I doubt their choice of timing for serving them would be influenced by the Aspen incident.
Unless RICO is among the charges to be brought. I can see where they would want to delay a RICO trial so that incident could be included.
JRTinMA said:I asked a question to an obsessed stalker, I didn't reference myself. Move on troll before you get another ban.
python said:move on fanboy, i asked 4 questions to an obsessed poster using his own words. nothing wrong with being a fanboy except pretending you are not and getting angry when faced with the truth.
fatandfast said:As many as 21 elected have chimed in on if Roger Clemens gets tried, Dem or Rep all say the crime has been paid for and that "we" don't have the money for such cases.
Now inside and outsiders can see how politics screws with other branches of government. Armstrong's case will be very expensive, very unpopular and most important a career sinker for lots of politicians. When asked about the pursuit of justice, spending millions on if Lance did something wrong while winning bike races 10 years ago will appear pretty foolish to regular voters who already think the courts are wasting load of cash "fighting crime". If he is not indicted before this years Wall St bonuses go out color him clear. The outrage is coming but toward Pharmstrong at a cost of 10 million,no way.
all is well in France and Belgium today but wait until the expense bills roll in for fact finding missions, the voters will not hear of it.Lance should follow Tyler on twitter so he can avoid the little gnome until this blows over.
Tyler are you takin' that snowshoe job? I hear there is little doping controls in competitive snowshoe racing
python said:i tentatively see your point and i hate to dog-pile, but didn't you claim to be firmly on the fence wrt mr armstrong ?
if memory serves, you also claimed a desire to gloat over the fact that many posters here will never see texas indicted ?
didn't you also complain that the forum moderation is too anti-armstrong ?
if my memory is right (in fact, it is and your statements have been on record for quite a while) am i entitled to assume you're no longer on the fence and fully switch into a fanboy mode ?
judging by your (and the others) latest post, many think you did but it would be wrong to claim we *know* you climbed off the fence.
Berzin said:This is the issue I have also.
How can someone say he doesn't care what happens to Lance one way or another, yet is certain he'll be found innocent in court?
Then spend time addressing not any of the legal issues brought up or any of the facts, but other poster's so-called "obsession" with Armstrong?
Seems to be taking both sides at once so he can cover himself just in case he's wrong. I think at a certain point, despite the fact that I had a post deleted when I addressed this issue, is the problem with letting trolls run amok.
This type of nonsensical stance does not lend itself to addressing the issues at hand, which is what is sorely lacking from the fanboy perspective.
JRTinMA said:4) When you or anybody uses the term fanboy I win.
Always?JRTinMA said:1) I don't care and rich people who play the game always walk. Its really quite easy. If I am a fan or not is immaterial to the facts. You have to remove the emotion and lies to see the facts. This place is full of both.
Quite true - which is why I called you on misrepresenting the opinion that Cimacoppi wrote earlier this year.JRTinMA said:2) He came on with his groupie comment and I responded. He used the term obsessed himself and I copied him and used it again. You really have to read and think for yourself instead of believing the lies in here.
Isn't the highlighted obsessive?JRTinMA said:3) I have nothing to cover, you will be one of the ones gnashing your teeth if he walks. If he goes to jail I will be wrong, if he walks see how many in the clinic can admit they were. Your post was deleted because it was blatant trolling, imagine that. See just because you disagree does not make me a troll.
He will walk..... as in no prison, perhaps.JRTinMA said:4) When you or anybody uses the term fanboy I win. While you are actually doing the trolling it proves you have nothing. Especially from somebody who flip flops all the time on dopers and has absolutely no basis at all. I have taken the same stance all along, he will walk.
red_flanders said:How does one win if they haven't taken a side? What exactly are you winning here?
ChrisE said:You tell 'em, JRT. You fanboy. Funny how reasoned well thought out takes earns one the label of fanboy.
Right on about the resident schizo Berzin.