I was in Barnes and Noble yesterday flipping though the magazine in question, and I had to remind myself I was in a bookstore and not a vomitorium, because the author of this horrendous piece of garbage made me want to puke.
It was the most effeminate, obsequious display of homo-erotic man-crush drivel ever committed to print. This guy is talking to his teenage daughter and trying to explain why her dad is almost in tears over the the Armstrong drug allegations, and how much he feels betrayed at the age of 46?
How he gazed longingly into her eyes, looking for a glimpse of redemption...and none came. Or something to that effect. Man, that article was terrible. I'm at a loss.
First of all, this cat is not a journalist. He lost all objectivity a long time ago. Second, his insights are so vapid and forced it sounds as if he was in love with Lance, and now has come to the realization that his lover was what everyone else suspected except for him-a drag queen.
In the end, he still gives the cheater props by reminding us of all the "thrills" he gave everyone on the bike during his Tour reign. "They can take away his jerseys, but they can't take my memories!!!"
I've never been so sick in my life after reading an article.
This article is nothing but an excuse to keep the man-crush alive while admitting that yes, it was built on the fraud of cheating. And the lying about the cheating. And the profiteering from said cheating. What it does is it exempts Armstrong from any moral or ethical categorization, as if his Tour wins should exist on a different plane on the strength of his fanboy's love of him. What is missing from this is a sense of outrage that the author has been cheated. He doesn't feel cheated, he feels jilted that his one-night stand didn't propose to him the next morning.
A confession will be met with this-"Well, everyone else was doing it, so no big deal. It proves that the playing field was level. He was still the best".
I want to see two things happen-no acknowledgment whatsoever of any of his Tour wins (his presence totally removed from the Tour record books) and a detailed listing of the drug regimen he was on, right underneath this commercial with an explanation to all his fans letting them know exactly what he was on-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIl5RxhLZ5U
It was the most effeminate, obsequious display of homo-erotic man-crush drivel ever committed to print. This guy is talking to his teenage daughter and trying to explain why her dad is almost in tears over the the Armstrong drug allegations, and how much he feels betrayed at the age of 46?
How he gazed longingly into her eyes, looking for a glimpse of redemption...and none came. Or something to that effect. Man, that article was terrible. I'm at a loss.
First of all, this cat is not a journalist. He lost all objectivity a long time ago. Second, his insights are so vapid and forced it sounds as if he was in love with Lance, and now has come to the realization that his lover was what everyone else suspected except for him-a drag queen.
In the end, he still gives the cheater props by reminding us of all the "thrills" he gave everyone on the bike during his Tour reign. "They can take away his jerseys, but they can't take my memories!!!"
I've never been so sick in my life after reading an article.
This article is nothing but an excuse to keep the man-crush alive while admitting that yes, it was built on the fraud of cheating. And the lying about the cheating. And the profiteering from said cheating. What it does is it exempts Armstrong from any moral or ethical categorization, as if his Tour wins should exist on a different plane on the strength of his fanboy's love of him. What is missing from this is a sense of outrage that the author has been cheated. He doesn't feel cheated, he feels jilted that his one-night stand didn't propose to him the next morning.
Race Radio said:Wonderboy is asking around, trying to the gauge the possibility of a "Confession".
A confession will be met with this-"Well, everyone else was doing it, so no big deal. It proves that the playing field was level. He was still the best".
I want to see two things happen-no acknowledgment whatsoever of any of his Tour wins (his presence totally removed from the Tour record books) and a detailed listing of the drug regimen he was on, right underneath this commercial with an explanation to all his fans letting them know exactly what he was on-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIl5RxhLZ5U