Dallas_ said:
Cimacoppi49, I really look forward to reading your posts. Your Legal Eagle input is much appreciated.
cheers
.
in regards to legality I must admit if speculation and testimony from self serving sociopaths aka loudest landis and and mom loving tyler humpleton were money
all of you would be billionaires ...it must be disturbing to all howling hyenas everywhere that speculation no matter how often ,viciously or vociferously repeated
in the legal system doesnt equal facts and that my friends is at the bedrock of our legal system.
this is from soemone who is not particularly fond of the unuballer but looks at the endless whining emotional tenor of all these posts and is amused that so far other than the unproven allegations of two self serving people who want a book deal there isnt any evidence . well flioyd has signed on for federal money not actually a book deal and that IS a fact. No conflict of interest or ulterior motives there right? NOpe just a good natured cyclist who was unfairly abused and taken advantage of ...mmm huh..
that funny little thing (evidence) is necessary to convict anyone. so far some people take pretty boys words as fact. sadly though for witch hunters everywhere , allegation is something different from facts and he alleges things. oddly enough to protect himself floyd engaged the services of two attorneys whose retainer is in the six figure range.
How could floyd pay for such legal power costing 250K when hes admitted that hes broke? someone else is covering the ante. whose attorneys were these fine fellows before signing on with old old honest floyd? Why they worked for that fine fellow GReg Lemond. That is a fact but maybe just a conicidence?
Now then lookign at the FACTS who does lemond HATE?
Lemond had 70,000 pages of documents he turned over to the feds. A little excessively obsessive methinks. Isnt paying for someone else to lie
to federal investigators a crime as well? Now my legally challenged friends that is speculation but pretty much in line with the wonderful examples of inductive reasoning and dim intelligence expressed we see so often on here .
It is probably not a coincidence that floyd and lemond made up just before that. what are the legal issues of this speculation? i do know it is illegal to conspire to defame someone and pay for others legal counsel so they can hyde behind a shield. I beleive that is a conspiracy charge.
it is amazing to me the petty ugliness of human spirit that is so often displayed here such as the recent barrrGE BY GOOSE McCHUCKLES. the forum in general reminds me of a village in massachusetts ...was it salem?
heres the latest...levi won by 58 hundredths of a second over christian vandevelde. That PROVES levi must be doping. wait, if he beat him by less than a second and is doping then vandevelde must be doping also . garmin cervleo has been thought of as a clean team but this proves they are doping right?. levi didnt win becuase he has ridden ten tours ? and is incredibly experienced and savvy ...no it isnt experience and millions of miles of racing and insght, nope just dope..hmmm theres a lot of dope(s) on this site...