slowspoke said:Sorry, but this is rubbish. Mainly it's socio economic reasons in western countries. It's expensive to swim and poorly renumerated when compared to other sports.
TBH, the link you post fully supports my theory. It's partly cultural:
"I always hear so many stories from different people, even in my own family, where they've had such bad experiences with being in the water and swimming that I can really relate. I can sit back and go: 'This is what happened to me. I completely get it. But that's never a reason for you not to learn how to swim.' You see a lot of that, especially in the African-American community."
Frther; the wealth divide isn't as big here in the Netherlands (Western Europe!) as in the USA. Swimming is a relatively affordable sport over here, in fact most families here can afford sports for their kids. And yet it's always soccer. So in the case of my country it's definitely a cultural issue.
My singular viewpoint eschews my position. I agree, money certainly plays a huge role if we look on the world (and thus Olympic scale).
And when I meant that an African government needed to set up a program that includes the complete financing of the program, not just throwing down a swimming pool or two
So yes, by this omision my post is rightfully bunk. Thanks for the correction!
To sum my theory:
In western Europe a lot of choices are made culturally.
I have a hunch this is also true in the USA, but that's just a hunch (the big three sports take the cake). I certainly can belive money is a larger issue in the USA do to the wealth divide between races.
In the poor parts of the world (for a better description) it's a monetary issue foremost, aggravated by the lack of facilities. Without these two culture doesn't even enter the equation.