• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Olympic Road Race (men’s) 2024 (August 3rd)

Page 32 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mathieu should probably have tried a bit harder to make it work with Wout after they got away the first time but when Wout proved to be able to match him on Montmartre, it was very hard if not impossible for him to win.
He should have read the Belgian strategy. Van Aert was never going to make a winning attack, Evenepoel could. So always mark Evenepoel, and then the Belgian team will help control the race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sciatic
I love the Olympics and it should be a target for all top riders to want to win. It just makes me sad that someone who clearly would have been stronger than the winner didn't turn up and it cheapens the whole competition
I don't think it's fair to say that; this is a completely different race from the Tour GC. Remco crushed the rest today and I think Tadej would have had his hands full today personally. I'm a Tadej fan so I don't rate one blindly over the other, but that goes both ways. Remco was really, really good today.
 
Mørkøv says in the post race interview the Danes wanted to ride offensively from the get-go.

Fair enough - but maybe they should have realized a bit earlier (an hour earlier) that the other big teams didn't want to contribute to that.

Btw, he said - once again - that he is in the shape of his life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awavey and E_F_
GUER0fyXEAAW4zR

GUER0fyWUAAGZpx
 
He should have read the Belgian strategy. Van Aert was never going to make a winning attack, Evenepoel could. So always mark Evenepoel, and then the Belgian team will help control the race.

Perhaps, but I think it was right to launch the first attack. If Wout couldn't follow him and he had been on his own, things would have looked good for him.
 
I think 2016 was better.

In fact any Olympic race that wasn't decided with 20+ kilometers to go would be better than this one, in my opinion.

But the surroundings, the route etc were nice.
Sure, we all have our preferences. For me the race was exciting for a couple of hours, the location was beyond stunning, the crowd was incredible, there was great racing, and the guy I was rooting for won.

But beyond the last, that was objectively a great race. If someone else prefers another, OK. But I thought the venue sucked in 2016, and that is a huge negative for me.

But the point was, crapping on that race by whining that one guy didn't show up and acting like he'd have walked away with the race? LAME AF.
 
and the guy I was rooting for won.

Of course that plays a role. :)

But beyond the last, that was objectively a great race. If someone else prefers another, OK. But I thought the venue sucked in 2016, and that is a huge negative for me.

I liked that the route and the surroundings were different in Rio. The audience wasn't impressive, that's true. But still the drama was ten times that of Paris, especially towards the end.

But the point was, crapping on that race by whining that one guy didn't show up and acting like he'd have walked away with the race?

I agree that the value of a race shouldn't rely on who is participating and who is not. In the short perspecitve, yeah, you can say that rider A won because rider B wasn't there. But a champion is a champion.
 
I think 2016 was better.

In fact any Olympic race that wasn't decided with 20+ kilometers to go would be better than this one, in my opinion.

But the surroundings, the route etc were nice.

Yeah I'd say go back to part in the thread where we were discussing ostriches & burgers if people thought this race was that good, that first however many hours where the peleton were virtually track standing were as tedious as anything I've watched for a while.

The circuit part livened it up and you'd have to be completely incompetent not to make Montmartre look good for a route.

Does that make it a good race ? Because the winner was largely who was expected to win, and won by a margin even with a late puncture, i dont know if many picked anyone except Allaphillipe as a French medalist.

Difficult to properly assess imo. It feels better finish, than most Olympic road races have got, but see how well you remember it 4 years from now would be my criteria as to its goodness as a race.