luckyboy said:
Not saying anything like that.
People (this swimmer, general public) at it emotionally instead of looking at the rules and cases. WADA studied meldonium and said traces can last in the body for months last I heard, and then the IOC ban on previous dopers was unlawful, so why shouldn't Efimova be there?
In an ideal world athletes would be banned for life on first offence but that isn't the rule, so we look at what the rules actually are instead of crying about something in accordance to how we wish they would be.
Spot on. I don't think I could have put it better myself. The rules are there. She was caught. She served her sentence and there is still an issue regarding Meldonium. Not that difficult, but King obviously doesn't know that.
My concern is the double standards. Of course, it's easy to label King a clean or dirty athlete, based on different things, but Efimova is very good, talented, showed great potential already as a junior (well, most Olympic and World medalists do) and she is still winning medals. She tested positive, and supposedly it's "state sponsored" yet a state sponsored doper, with massive talent and I am guessing hard work and training still being beaten by a clean athlete? It's like the Armstrong defenders back in the day, "Lance is clean, the other guys aren't." Yeah. Basso, Mayo, Ullrich, Hamilton, Landis, Heras, Mancebo, Valverde, Vinokurov, etc all caught doping, yet Armstrong managed to beat all of them clean. That's how I view King and any of these holier-than-thou athletes. But you just know that that's what the American media wants. Any lambasting of foreigners (especially a convicted doper, ESPECIALLY a Russian doper) is Mozart to their eyes and ears.
It would be magical if years down the road we found out that, among many, Phelps was doping to the gills. And btw, wasn't he suspended for drug use? Perhaps not a PED, but if it was deemed illegal, it was illegal....