Oldman said:
Your generalizations are pretty prejudiced. I would assume when you characterize America as "that society" you know everything about it and aren't considering yourself among that group. Nice to be that sure of yourself, isn't it?
It's VERY nice to be this sure of myself. At least when it comes to the jr vs mstr racing paradigm.
I can't even come close to explicating how many rich masters I've seen at races who then b*tch that the sport should be bigger in America. Give your head a shake. WHO is going to do that? Perhaps fields of juniors fighting for wins? Certainly more than has-beens stroking their seat post...
I can guarantee you that it won't be via financially established old men (35+) buying bikes to beat on their buddies. That funds the MARKET of cycling, but not the sport.
The continuation of the sport we all love rests upon the ability to feed the machine with young talent. If we are not helping young kids to race, to understand racing, and to persue it rabidly, then the sport is dead.
I'm only saying this to make sure that those who are 'racing' in the masters' categories realize their obligation to the sport in general. Cycling is not solely there to make you feel good about yourself, although that's somehting you should get out of it. In the bigger picture, you should also be helping those who want to race.
I've noticed in America that it really does seem to be a 'rich-kid' sport. That's sort of silly. How much of the athlete pool are you ignoring? You've got a fair number of velodromes in the country, and a track bike costs nothing, there's a nudge in the right direction...