Paris-Roubaix 2023, one day monument, April 9 (men's)

Page 41 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
A lot of talk about luck...
-Certainly there is 'bad luck': a spectator steps out, the racer in front of you crashes, etc...
-People 'make their luck' too though: equipment choice is a big one, line choice, positioning (to an extent), etc...
I don't know WvA's tire choice, psi, etc. so I can't discuss it without "was he ...".
--was he running too light, too narrow, too low psi, was he using sealant?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChewbaccaDefense
A lot of talk about luck...
-Certainly there is 'bad luck': a spectator steps out, the racer in front of you crashes, etc...
-People 'make their luck' too though: equipment choice is a big one, line choice, positioning (to an extent), etc...
I don't know WvA's tire choice, psi, etc. so I can't discuss it without "was he ...".
--was he running too light, too narrow, too low psi, was he using sealant?
If we're gonna call mechanicals a skill issue then crash dodging should also be.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: jmdirt and proffate
Both Wout and Mathieu are huge sportsmen and both have shown grace both in winning and in losing. Both also have toxic fans. This is inevitable. It’s not like the one’s fanbase is more toxic than the other, but that’s the case for most great riders. For example, I wouldn’t engage with several Evenepoel fans on this forum.

Anyway, any real cycling fan should be disappointed with Wout’s puncture. Seeing Mathieu and Wout in a sprint a deux on the Velodrome after such a battle is a dream scenario for anyone who is a cycling romanticist.

This is not to say that Mathieu isn’t a deserving winner. He animated the race and attacked the most. Any of Wout or Mathieu would have been a deserving winner today. No one in here can say the one would have beaten the other in a sprint. It’s fanboyism to say you “know for sure”. They’ve both gotten the better of each other in a sprint in many different races.

Chapeau Mathieu, you beast.
What about someone like me who is a fan of both? ;)
 
Ia this a conspiracy?

FtSNro8WYAQYvzG
Jumbo will have bib 21 at LBL…..maybe Wout should give it a go after all
 
If we're gonna call mechanicals a skill issue then crash dodging should also be.
Making a decision is a skill. People make wise equipment choices, and they make wise avoidance choices as well, but sometimes there is no avoidance.

ie: sealant adds weight so many pro racers will likely not use it (depending on equipment set up). If they get a puncture, sealant could save the day.
 
I'm no fan of Chris Horner's analysis (or more accurately: I can't listen to more than a few seconds as he butchers every name) but this race is one of those times where his butterfly effect motif actually makes sense. What happens without the Degenkolb crash? Does Wout attack? If so, does he make the gap (both Philipsen and MVDP lost of a ton of speed in that incident)? If Wout doesn't attack, does he flat?

For me, without the crash this race comes to the line with 7 (or 5 or 4 but more than 1). Whether you'd prefer that outcome is a matter of taste. Alpecin probably still wins if that's the case (Philipsen) but an entirely different story would have been told.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jmdirt
Making a decision is a skill. People make wise equipment choices, and they make wise avoidance choices as well, but sometimes there is no avoidance.

ie: sealant adds weight so many pro racers will likely not use it (depending on equipment set up). If they get a puncture, sealant could save the day.
No matter what, mechanicals are a very stochastic event, even just the location of it. Van Aert flatted at literally the worst moment possible, I don't see how you can say that's not terrible luck
 
What a race! Congrats to MVP on finally winning the PR. The decisive action was started by JV guys over 100 km before the line and after Arenberg all the top guys were already in the front group. What a drama on Carrefour de l'Arbre! Degenkolp was down (after colliding with MVP, who narrowly escaped), then WVA attacks hard with MVP following and then WVA punctures in the worst possible moment! Terrible luck. MVP goes solo and wins his 4th monument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmdirt and Tonton
A lot of talk about luck...
-Certainly there is 'bad luck': a spectator steps out, the racer in front of you crashes, etc...
-People 'make their luck' too though: equipment choice is a big one, line choice, positioning (to an extent), etc...
I don't know WvA's tire choice, psi, etc. so I can't discuss it without "was he ...".
--was he running too light, too narrow, too low psi, was he using sealant?
He hadn't punctured all day, clearly bad choice in pressure or tires...?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jmdirt
I'm no fan of Chris Horner's analysis (or more accurately: I can't listen to more than a few seconds as he butchers every name) but this race is one of those times where his butterfly effect motif actually makes sense. What happens without the Degenkolb crash? Does Wout attack? If so, does he make the gap (both Philipsen and MVDP lost of a ton of speed in that incident)? If Wout doesn't attack, does he flat?

For me, without the crash this race comes to the line with 7 (or 5 or 4 but more than 1). Whether you'd prefer that outcome is a matter of taste. Alpecin probably still wins if that's the case (Philipsen) but an entirely different story would have been told.
If it comes down to a group of seven, Degenkolb has won 100% of sprints for the win from that group size in, like, the last 30 years of Roubaix.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jmdirt
I agree. If Wout was that strong. He would have eaten into MVDP’s lead. He’s the better timetrialer after all. Wout rode a great race up till that point. But it was up to him to chase down MVDP if he wanted to win. He didn’t because he couldn’t or else he had a brain fart.
WVA also said he knew after the flat the win was gone because no way you can close 25s to VDP in that shape. So it's unlikely he could've kept 20 meters on VDP after the attack after Degenkolb crash. I don't buy for one moment he could've gone solo to the line. Most likely they'd either end up in a two up sprint or VDP would stop working and Philipsen would come back leading to a new race.
 
WVA also said he knew after the flat the win was gone because no way you can close 25s to VDP in that shape. So it's unlikely he could've kept 20 meters on VDP after the attack after Degenkolb crash. I don't buy for one moment he could've gone solo to the line. Most likely they'd either end up in a two up sprint or VDP would stop working and Philipsen would come back leading to a new race.
Closing 25s vs holding a gap are hardly the same. Especially at the end of Carrefour when you've just blown through all your anaerobic excess anyway, so it's not like there's much left to snap close a gap.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: jmdirt and Volderke
Ah here. I don’t think “fault” or “blame” are words that should be thrown around either way, but to blame Degenkolb for his own crash is really pushing it.
Overall I very much agree to this POV and was also mine in my first post about the indicent on the live signal.
My 2nd post is related to the ones posting about "fault" or "blame", that I watched the episode again a few times (and now again), in which case the "blame" must lie on Degenkolb's own shoulders - unlike those wanting a DSQ from either Philipsen , MdVP or both. Which is not only pushing it but directly wrong IMHO.
In generel I'm inclined to 'a racing incident', too.
Edit: Now been re-watching the incident at least 15 times, with the eyes of first Philipsen, then as MvDP and then as Degenkolp and a couple of times more - which just convinces me even more.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jmdirt
A lot of talk about luck...
-Certainly there is 'bad luck': a spectator steps out, the racer in front of you crashes, etc...
-People 'make their luck' too though: equipment choice is a big one, line choice, positioning (to an extent), etc...
I don't know WvA's tire choice, psi, etc. so I can't discuss it without "was he ...".
--was he running too light, too narrow, too low psi, was he using sealant?

This is my question. If not, why in the f**k not? This is 2023, sure sealant adds a little rotational weight...but it will also save your ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmdirt