MacBAir said:
El Pistolero said:
MacBAir said:
El Pistolero said:
I've got to admit, Sagan is becoming an even better world champ than Tom Boonen in 2006. A lot less wins, but the season ain't over yet, and Boonen failed to win a stage in the Tour in 2006 (but he did wear the yellow jersey).
Well, Tom got pretty much all of his 2006 wins from Qatar, Eneco tour and tour of Belgium. Right?
Peter almost won tirreno, won stages at Suisse, California, 2 tour stages + possible green, and there's (possibly a lot to come).
Boonen won the Ronde van Vlaanderen, E3 Prijs Harelbeke, Scheldeprijs (and that year's edition was actually exciting), was second in Roubaix, won 3 stages in Paris-Nice, won a stage in the Tour de Suisse and wore yellow in the Tour. Almost winning sadly doesn't count.
Oh and he was third in Milan-San Remo, his team-mate Pippo won.
If almost winning doesn't count then don't list his second at PR and third at MSR? What's the logic behind this?
Sagan won GW, RVV, 2 stages at California, 2 Stages at suisse, 2 stages at the Tour. So, at this point, ignoring what Sagan will most likely still accomplish (at least green jersey) he already had a better year than Tom.
Also, even with second places, he had a better year too.
I never said Boonen almost won M-SR or Roubaix, I just said he got second and third in them. Boonen won 3 stages in Paris-Nice, one stage in Tour de Suisse, 3 stages in the Eneco Tour, two stages in Tour of Belgium, 4 stages in the Tour of Qatar and the overall GC, etc.
E3 Harelbeke = Gent-Wevelgem
Ronde van Vlaanderen = Ronde van Vlaanderen
Third in Milan San Remo > Sagan couldn't sprint because of a crash in Milan-San Remo
Second in Roubaix > being outfoxed by the very same Boonen in Roubaix
Boonen won 7 stages in one-week WT stage races, Sagan won 2.
So all Sagan has that is clearly better than Boonen's 2006 is his two Tour stages. Which is why I said he's becoming a better world champ than Boonen in 2006. Don't get your panties in a knot.