• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Peter Sagan vs. Mark Cavendish. Who has the best palmares.

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Who has the best palmares?

  • Peter Sagan

    Votes: 75 72.1%
  • Mark Cavendish

    Votes: 29 27.9%

  • Total voters
    104
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Sagan of course. His palmares shows a wider ability of races, and he's 5 years younger then Cav.

If you look at really big races, which are monuments, GT's, WC's and maybe big stage races like Pais Vasco and Dauphiné, it's already 3-2 for Sagan.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
...Cav's record will soon be broken by a different sprinter considering the tendency to make more races flat...


I don't agree with that. Kittel was the next big thing but he's already 28 and he's only won 9 TDF stages. Cav had 25 by that age (I think). Already we have talk of Gaviria, Groenewegen, Bennett and Ewan coming through and there are guys like Demare, Coquard, Bouhanni, Kristoff, Degenkolb and not to forget Sagan who are capable of springing a surprise every now and then. He currently has 8 more wins than Darrigade and is likely to catch Merckx and their records cover the days of split stages in the Tour, adding more opportunities for wins.

Cav's achievements at the TDF are incredible and it will take a serious talent, one which I don't think we have seen in the current crop of young riders, to even get close to that. Add to that the fact Cav could easily add a few more wins and I think whatever record he sets will stand for a long time.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
As the question is about palmares only, the answer is very simple: Cavendish currently has better palmares than Sagan. However, unless he suffers some catastrophic injury or a complete collapse in form or something similar, Sagan will certainly have better palmares by the time he is Cavendish's age.

But all Cav really wins is flat stages. Most of his victories are the same, some of them are impressive like the echelon stage in the Tour, but most are bores. Sprinters can win more races than anyone else

This may all be true, and it may be terribly unfair that sprinters get so many chances to win races. It is obviously true that Sagan is much more versatile. It doesn't change the fact that Cavendish has won more races and won more important races and therefore, right at this moment, has a better palmares. He won't have for very much longer.
 
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
Re: Re:

King Boonen said:
El Pistolero said:
...Cav's record will soon be broken by a different sprinter considering the tendency to make more races flat...


I don't agree with that. Kittel was the next big thing but he's already 28 and he's only won 9 TDF stages. Cav had 25 by that age (I think). Already we have talk of Gaviria, Groenewegen, Bennett and Ewan coming through and there are guys like Demare, Coquard, Bouhanni, Kristoff, Degenkolb and not to forget Sagan who are capable of springing a surprise every now and then. He currently has 8 more wins than Darrigade and is likely to catch Merckx and their records cover the days of split stages in the Tour, adding more opportunities for wins.

Cav's achievements at the TDF are incredible and it will take a serious talent, one which I don't think we have seen in the current crop of young riders, to even get close to that. Add to that the fact Cav could easily add a few more wins and I think whatever record he sets will stand for a long time.

Agree on that. Cav's record at TDF will not be broken by another sprinter any time soon. It's huge achievement, and I'm not a fan of him at all, on the contrary...
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re: Re:

Mr.White said:
King Boonen said:
El Pistolero said:
...Cav's record will soon be broken by a different sprinter considering the tendency to make more races flat...


I don't agree with that. Kittel was the next big thing but he's already 28 and he's only won 9 TDF stages. Cav had 25 by that age (I think). Already we have talk of Gaviria, Groenewegen, Bennett and Ewan coming through and there are guys like Demare, Coquard, Bouhanni, Kristoff, Degenkolb and not to forget Sagan who are capable of springing a surprise every now and then. He currently has 8 more wins than Darrigade and is likely to catch Merckx and their records cover the days of split stages in the Tour, adding more opportunities for wins.

Cav's achievements at the TDF are incredible and it will take a serious talent, one which I don't think we have seen in the current crop of young riders, to even get close to that. Add to that the fact Cav could easily add a few more wins and I think whatever record he sets will stand for a long time.

Agree on that. Cav's record at TDF will not be broken by another sprinter any time soon. It's huge achievement, and I'm not a fan of him at all, on the contrary...

It's really not all that special, Cipo and Peta would have broken it, but they were excluded from the Tour many times. Petacchi even kicked Cav's ass in 2010, he was already an old man back then. Cav simply had piss poor competition for many years.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
Mr.White said:
King Boonen said:
El Pistolero said:
...Cav's record will soon be broken by a different sprinter considering the tendency to make more races flat...


I don't agree with that. Kittel was the next big thing but he's already 28 and he's only won 9 TDF stages. Cav had 25 by that age (I think). Already we have talk of Gaviria, Groenewegen, Bennett and Ewan coming through and there are guys like Demare, Coquard, Bouhanni, Kristoff, Degenkolb and not to forget Sagan who are capable of springing a surprise every now and then. He currently has 8 more wins than Darrigade and is likely to catch Merckx and their records cover the days of split stages in the Tour, adding more opportunities for wins.

Cav's achievements at the TDF are incredible and it will take a serious talent, one which I don't think we have seen in the current crop of young riders, to even get close to that. Add to that the fact Cav could easily add a few more wins and I think whatever record he sets will stand for a long time.

Agree on that. Cav's record at TDF will not be broken by another sprinter any time soon. It's huge achievement, and I'm not a fan of him at all, on the contrary...

It's really not all that special, Cipo and Peta would have broken it, but they were excluded from the Tour many times. Petacchi even kicked Cav's *** in 2010, he was already an old man back then. Cav simply had piss poor competition for many years.
Cav won 5 stages in 2010 and Petacchi won 'just' 2.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
Mr.White said:
King Boonen said:
El Pistolero said:
...Cav's record will soon be broken by a different sprinter considering the tendency to make more races flat...


I don't agree with that. Kittel was the next big thing but he's already 28 and he's only won 9 TDF stages. Cav had 25 by that age (I think). Already we have talk of Gaviria, Groenewegen, Bennett and Ewan coming through and there are guys like Demare, Coquard, Bouhanni, Kristoff, Degenkolb and not to forget Sagan who are capable of springing a surprise every now and then. He currently has 8 more wins than Darrigade and is likely to catch Merckx and their records cover the days of split stages in the Tour, adding more opportunities for wins.

Cav's achievements at the TDF are incredible and it will take a serious talent, one which I don't think we have seen in the current crop of young riders, to even get close to that. Add to that the fact Cav could easily add a few more wins and I think whatever record he sets will stand for a long time.

Agree on that. Cav's record at TDF will not be broken by another sprinter any time soon. It's huge achievement, and I'm not a fan of him at all, on the contrary...

It's really not all that special, Cipo and Peta would have broken it, but they were excluded from the Tour many times. Petacchi even kicked Cav's *** in 2010, he was already an old man back then. Cav simply had piss poor competition for many years.

This is just ridiculous now. Petacchi for instance barely won a race of note until he was nearly 27. The only way he challenges that record is if he's allowed to ride his 2003 season every year for a decade.
 
If it wasn't that special there would be loads of people around the same mark, yet the only people anywhere near him are possibly the two greatest riders who ever lived. Bias is fine but if you're going to show that level of bias why even start the thread? Cav's TDF record is unparalleled, he is the greatest GT sprinter of all time, especially after this year.

Cav won 5 stages in 2010. Petacchi won 2. I guess it depends what their goals were but I wouldn't say that was an ass kicking.
 
Cipollini and Petacchi both have more GT stage wins than Cavendish. Their record in one-day races is very similar as all 3 have won San Remo once. Ale never won a WC but he did win Paris-Tours which stacks up well against Zolder and Copenhague.

Don't agree that Cav is best sprinter of all-time. Needs to win 10 more GT stages
 
Mar 11, 2009
1,005
0
0
Re:

King Boonen said:
If it wasn't that special there would be loads of people around the same mark, yet the only people anywhere near him are possibly the two greatest riders who ever lived. Bias is fine but if you're going to show that level of bias why even start the thread? Cav's TDF record is unparalleled, he is the greatest GT sprinter of all time, especially after this year.

Cav won 5 stages in 2010. Petacchi won 2. I guess it depends what their goals were but I wouldn't say that was an *** kicking.

I agree to some extent, but has it really always been the case that teams would show up to the Tour(s) built around a sprint train. My superficial impression is that this is something that may very well have come to pass with Cipollini himself. So we are really talking 20-25 years. That is still a lot, but it is not all time.
 
Mar 13, 2015
2,637
0
0
Re:

Billie said:
Cipollini and Petacchi both have more GT stage wins than Cavendish. Their record in one-day races is very similar as all 3 have won San Remo once. Ale never won a WC but he did win Paris-Tours which stacks up well against Zolder and Copenhague.

Don't agree that Cav is best sprinter of all-time. Needs to win 10 more GT stages

He's not, Cippo is, but his 30 Tour wins is quite impressive
 
Re: Peter Sagan vs. Mark Cavendish. Who has the best palmare

Interesting debate, actually. I can see both sides of the argument and don't pretend to hold the truth. When it's all said and done, Sagan will, by far have the best palmares, I think that we can agree on that. He's so young. But now?

If I ask myself which palmares I would want to have, I'd pick Sagan's. He has had (way) less success in July than Cav, but still has wins and several Green jerseys, The Ronde>MSR, IMO it is (like PR) a super-monument. One more RRWC, including the last one, ahead of Cavendish.

Sagan is so good that he can win two more rainbow jerseys, maybe more :eek: , and a dozen monuments. And many GC stages. And one week stage races, a la Kelly. He's that good.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Re:

King Boonen said:
If it wasn't that special there would be loads of people around the same mark, yet the only people anywhere near him are possibly the two greatest riders who ever lived. Bias is fine but if you're going to show that level of bias why even start the thread? Cav's TDF record is unparalleled, he is the greatest GT sprinter of all time, especially after this year.

Cav won 5 stages in 2010. Petacchi won 2. I guess it depends what their goals were but I wouldn't say that was an *** kicking.

Petacchi won the green jersey. And he was already well in decline by then. Cav would have gotten his ass kicked against Cipo and Peta in their prime. 2010 showed us just that.

There was seriously no competition for Cav in 2008-2011. Greipel was on his own team and not allowed to race in the Tour, Boonen was sidelined multiple times because of his cocaine issues, Petacchi was sidelined, Robbie Mcewen was getting old and retired, Cipo was retired. And Cipo never gave a *** about the Tour because he couldn't even be bothered to finish it and ASO didn't invite him multiple times because of it. If Cipo cared he'd have broken Merckx's record. And yes I'm serious. I'm also serious when I say that the next top sprinter will come close to Cav's record or even break it. A sprinter can win 9 stages in a Tour these days, NINE!

From 2012-2016 Cav was a lot less dominant. Since Greipel left his team these are their results:

Cav; 15 Tour stages and 8 Giro stages
Greipel: 11 Tour stages and 4 Giro stages (he didn't ride the Giro or Vuelta quite a few times, a mistake imo).

Yes, Cav still holds the upper hand, but the difference isn't all that big. Especially when we consider that Cav said Greipel could only win "small shitty races".
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
King Boonen said:
If it wasn't that special there would be loads of people around the same mark, yet the only people anywhere near him are possibly the two greatest riders who ever lived. Bias is fine but if you're going to show that level of bias why even start the thread? Cav's TDF record is unparalleled, he is the greatest GT sprinter of all time, especially after this year.

Cav won 5 stages in 2010. Petacchi won 2. I guess it depends what their goals were but I wouldn't say that was an *** kicking.

Petacchi won the green jersey. And he was already well in decline by then. Cav would have gotten his *** kicked against Cipo and Peta in their prime. 2010 showed us just that.

There was seriously no competition for Cav in 2008-2011. Greipel was on his own team and not allowed to race in the Tour, Boonen was sidelined multiple times because of his cocaine issues, Petacchi was sidelined, Robbie Mcewen was getting old and retired, Cipo was retired. And Cipo never gave a **** about the Tour because he couldn't even be bothered to finish it and ASO didn't invite him multiple times because of it. If Cipo cared he'd have broken Merckx's record. And yes I'm serious. I'm also serious when I say that the next top sprinter will come close to Cav's record or even break it. A sprinter can win 9 stages in a Tour these days, NINE!

From 2012-2016 Cav was a lot less dominant. Since Greipel left his team these are their results:

Cav; 15 Tour stages and 8 Giro stages
Greipel: 11 Tour stages and 4 Giro stages (he didn't ride the Giro or Vuelta quite a few times, a mistake imo).

Yes, Cav still holds the upper hand, but the difference isn't all that big. Especially when we consider that Cav said Greipel could only win "small shitty races".

It's funny you say this so emphatically when in reality it's riddled with opinion and speculation.
 
Cipo had Abdoujaparov, Zabel and Steels as competition at the Tour, that's a bit like Kittel and Greipel for Cavendish today, so no I don't think he could have broken Merckx' record, and he probably knew it, which might be the reason he never tried.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
King Boonen said:
If it wasn't that special there would be loads of people around the same mark, yet the only people anywhere near him are possibly the two greatest riders who ever lived. Bias is fine but if you're going to show that level of bias why even start the thread? Cav's TDF record is unparalleled, he is the greatest GT sprinter of all time, especially after this year.

Cav won 5 stages in 2010. Petacchi won 2. I guess it depends what their goals were but I wouldn't say that was an *** kicking.

Petacchi won the green jersey. And he was already well in decline by then. Cav would have gotten his *** kicked against Cipo and Peta in their prime. 2010 showed us just that.

He won the points jersey. When it came to actual sprinting for stage wins Cav destroyed him. Petacchi won 6 stages at the Tour, that's it.

There was seriously no competition for Cav in 2008-2011. Greipel was on his own team and not allowed to race in the Tour, Boonen was sidelined multiple times because of his cocaine issues, Petacchi was sidelined, Robbie Mcewen was getting old and retired, Cipo was retired. And Cipo never gave a **** about the Tour because he couldn't even be bothered to finish it and ASO didn't invite him multiple times because of it. If Cipo cared he'd have broken Merckx's record. And yes I'm serious. I'm also serious when I say that the next top sprinter will come close to Cav's record or even break it. A sprinter can win 9 stages in a Tour these days, NINE!

Cipo only has himself to blame for not winning more Tour stages. The evidence points to the fact he couldn't as he didn't even finish it. He had to resort to amassing stages in the second rate GTs (don't blame me, that's what they are). Random speculation is random speculation, the facts are he got nowhere near. in 2012 and 2013 Cav finished both the Giro and the Tour, something Cipo never did.

I would be very careful calling out the current number of stages sprinters can win. Go back through the Giros when Cipo was riding and count the flat stages, or look at when Petacchi won 9 stages (something you're railing against saying it shouldn't be possible). The opportunities for sprinters have always been there.

From 2012-2016 Cav was a lot less dominant. Since Greipel left his team these are their results:

Cav; 15 Tour stages and 8 Giro stages
Greipel: 11 Tour stages and 4 Giro stages (he didn't ride the Giro or Vuelta quite a few times, a mistake imo).

Yes, Cav still holds the upper hand, but the difference isn't all that big. Especially when we consider that Cav said Greipel could only win "small shitty races".

And in those years he crashed out once and didn't finish 2016. When it comes to GT sprinters Cav is the greatest of all time. Others are certainly close, but Cav has beaten everyone he's ever had to compete against and set a record that I doubt anyone will get close to for a long time. If it weren't for this year I'd say it was close with Cipo, but this year confirmed it.


I'm not surprised fans of Sagan also like Cipo. They are cut from the same arrogant, misogynistic, attention seeking cloth.
 
Re:

kingjr said:
Cipo had Abdoujaparov, Zabel and Steels as competition at the Tour, that's a bit like Kittel and Greipel for Cavendish today, so no I don't think he could have broken Merckx' record, and he probably knew it, which might be the reason he never tried.

The fact that he was a very high profile Italian sprinter racing for Italian sponsored teams with the Giro being a very important event in every season that he raced likely had some baring on his inability and lack of motivation for finishing the Tour. Most of those teams were built around allowing him to achieve his successes at the Giro and at other events that he could excel.
 
Re:

hrotha said:
The things people will say just because Cavendish is unlikable.
Well, I don't think it takes bias to state that his competition was poor in '08 - '10. Old Petacchi was the one who troubled him the most. McEwen and Boonen was past it sprinting wise. Bennati only really had the Giro '08 left at the very top. Hushovd was never the very best in the pan-flat sprints. Farrar was Farrar :eek: He [Cav] was of course very good, and would likely have dominated anyway, but he was fortunate to breakthrough while there was a changing of the guards (while he also had an extremely good team at his service, which cannot be stressed enough).

Regarding this very debate, it comes down to how much you value Tour (and Giro) stages vs. green and classics.
 
Re: Re:

El Pistolero said:
[quote="
From 2012-2016 Cav was a lot less dominant. Since Greipel left his team these are their results:

Cav; 15 Tour stages and 8 Giro stages
Greipel: 11 Tour stages and 4 Giro stages (he didn't ride the Giro or Vuelta quite a few times, a mistake imo).

Yes, Cav still holds the upper hand, but the difference isn't all that big. Especially when we consider that Cav said Greipel could only win "small shitty races".

To be fair to Cav, he'd crashed out completely in 2014 and in 2012 had the GC for Wiggins as Sky's focus.
 
Re:

hrotha said:
The things people will say just because Cavendish is unlikable.

He seems to have his share of fans and supporters for someone that is so "unlikable". He's alright with me though. A bit whiny and reckless on occasion but he's one hell of a sprinter, that can't be denied at all.