Re:
No, it's utter balls. No one has shown an actual example of a frame with a motor in that produces the same heat pattern. It can't be consistent with something that has never been shown. At most it is slightly suggestive of the possibility motor doping, but the whole documentary is massively flawed as has been explained countless times so I'm not going to rehash that here.
This is rubbish too. The only place I've seen objective discussion of that documentary is in the clinic. Outside the clinic we've seen the same, rehashed arguments and none of the new evidence we were told was coming.
I've not seen anyone in the clinic saying motor doping can't or is definitely not happening in the WT peloton. I've seen many, many posters point out that the current evidence does not stand up to any kind of honest scrutiny.
sniper said:No sure. Among a handful of Clinic posters it's utter balls, I realize that.
Just saying that outside of the Clinic most objective observers seem to think it was a convincing piece of journalism.
No, it's utter balls. No one has shown an actual example of a frame with a motor in that produces the same heat pattern. It can't be consistent with something that has never been shown. At most it is slightly suggestive of the possibility motor doping, but the whole documentary is massively flawed as has been explained countless times so I'm not going to rehash that here.
This is rubbish too. The only place I've seen objective discussion of that documentary is in the clinic. Outside the clinic we've seen the same, rehashed arguments and none of the new evidence we were told was coming.
I've not seen anyone in the clinic saying motor doping can't or is definitely not happening in the WT peloton. I've seen many, many posters point out that the current evidence does not stand up to any kind of honest scrutiny.