i raced against the guy, way back when. he is an impressive, super strong guy.
kind of a douche though. good rider. his **** stinks just like everybody else.
kind of a douche though. good rider. his **** stinks just like everybody else.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
dimspace said:can we set a cut of point when we stop talking about lance...
i would like to propose Friday April 19th 2013, unless anyone has any better ideas..
dimspace said:can we set a cut of point when we stop talking about lance...
i would like to propose Friday April 19th 2013, unless anyone has any better ideas..
dimspace said:can we set a cut of point when we stop talking about lance...
i would like to propose Friday April 19th 2013, unless anyone has any better ideas..
msjett said:A nice idea....but what would people do with all the energy they put into being pro or anti-lance?
ggusta said:Well said, I will take some issue with the sentence above. Americans are not as dull and slow witted as many like to paint. Being savvy to an over exposed image is natural when our media celebrity besotted culture forces us to process so many 'icons' at a time. At some point in the last couple years, the level of exposure he had began to turn a lot of people off. The idea of loving the fairy tale is so much purer than when a person presents themself as the fairy tale. There is an imbalance from the idea versus reality. It sets off red flags for many. Opinion is turning on Lance here. Not enough to slow the gravy train yet, but his brand is mature. When a brand matures, we get one last big push to max out the revenues before it gets pushed aside by the next big thing.
We're in the midst of that now. The last push for revenue.
Dr. Maserati said:Interesting post - just to clarify I did not suggest Americans are dull and slow witted, but the general sports fan knows little about cycling and most of the exposure in the mainstream USA is Lance centric.
Before this years Tour I thought it was win/win for him, as in if he won he is the returning hero, if not than he would appear human, humble and gracious in defeat which would enhance his marketability.
Unfortunately he was neither humble or gracious.
guilder said:I question how long CN will sponsor this forum. It reflects badly on their image of the CN cycling fan. If they understand the spike in cycling interest over the past year, I hope they understand it's not their new site or this horrific forum, but the returning LA. They'll dump this forum in less than a year, if not before January.
CentralCaliBike said:But the Mayans tell me that the world ends in 12 December 2012.
Willow22 said:Provide the entire energy requirements for a small city of course Will help reduce C02 emissions at least.
derailleur said:They invested themselves in hating him, and because he's able to overcome illness, hate, and age, they're losing their investment.
They're unable to avert their eyes, so they believe he's being forced on them.
If they want him to go away, they should try beating him in a bike race, not shouting on the internet.
CentralCaliBike said:But the Mayans tell me that the world ends in 12 December 2012.
Thoughtforfood said:I am going to stop posting
derailleur said:I surmise that many people here think that's a good idea.
derailleur said:I surmise that many people here think that's a good idea.
Thoughtforfood said:
derailleur said:You can't read, or do logic, can you?
derailleur said:You can't read, or do logic, can you?
derailleur said:I surmise that many people here think that's a good idea.
derailleur said:The fact that some people want you to continue posting doesn't mean that others don't want you to stop posting.
So, clearly, you don't do logic.
cavfan11 said:I have only been watching pro cycling for about a year or so, and only viewing these forums for about half that. I've noticed that it seems nearly every person here is willing to show their dislike of Lance Armstrong. I understand why people do (I am however surprised at the degree of which people will post things to prove why they do), but my question is: Has it always been this way?
Back in the 1999-2005 era, was Armstrong as hated of a figure as he is now? I am not a fanboy, but I am an American so Lance is in the media regardless of what the true cycling fans want.