The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Anything is better than Dendemonde, apart from yesterday in Essen. I think the changing conditions definitely helped but it was a good course. As I wrote yesterday, adding an accompanying round in somewhere between Dover and Holyhead that preceeds or follows this may also help attracting a larger field.Well I've actually changed my mind on this course - it's actually pretty good, and comparisons with Dendermonde are unfair; it's produced two excellent races, even with the expected winners. I'd have no problem with it staying on the calendar. Just move it to a month earlier, so more of the top riders turn up.
Moving it a month earlier probably would have precluded the participation of Van Aert and Pidcock. So not sure if that would lead to more top riders showing up. The women's start list wasn't that impressive (also as a result of sickness), but among the men basically only MvdP was missing.Well I've actually changed my mind on this course - it's actually pretty good, and comparisons with Dendermonde are unfair; it's produced two excellent races, even with the expected winners. I'd have no problem with it staying on the calendar. Just move it to a month earlier, so more of the top riders turn up.
Well I've actually changed my mind on this course - it's actually pretty good, and comparisons with Dendermonde are unfair; it's produced two excellent races, even with the expected winners. I'd have no problem with it staying on the calendar. Just move it to a month earlier, so more of the top riders turn up.
Also remove Eurosport!
Never get weather like that in Dublin in November, so probably not an exact comparison. I hope they do bring it back there, but that they sort out a beer-and-hot-whiskey license for next time.Well I've actually changed my mind on this course - it's actually pretty good, and comparisons with Dendermonde are unfair; it's produced two excellent races, even with the expected winners. I'd have no problem with it staying on the calendar. Just move it to a month earlier, so more of the top riders turn up.
What did Eurosport do?
On the TV coverage I believe they missed a Wout's issues due to an advert break.
PFP has been off in every single race so far… this race she actually looked good at the start before fading again.Really well deserved victory for Wout showing class, power and determination.
Pieterse should need to figure out a strategy in advance to beat Van Empel when the course isn’t technically decisive enough. I believe Van Empel will win every time when Pieterse goes head to head with her just on power and grit,
The course was better than expected but the lack of at least one decisive section makes it a little too… uneventful. Yet there were quite a lot of changes among the top six riders so some potential is there.
Oh and PFP just wasn’t close to the top riders. Anyone has information on if something was off? Couldn’t hardly be due to a too technical course and I thought she had an engine like Wout (comparable among the women)?
Pieterse should need to figure out a strategy in advance to beat Van Empel when the course isn’t technically decisive enough. I believe Van Empel will win every time when Pieterse goes head to head with her just on power and grit,
Oh and PFP just wasn’t close to the top riders. Anyone has information on if something was off? Couldn’t hardly be due to a too technical course and I thought she had an engine like Wout (comparable among the women)?
I was really disappointed seeing the preview videos but as soon as I arrived I could see this would be great. The last twists/turns/climbs were really tough and brilliant from a spectator point of view. You could stand on one little hill and see so much.Well I've actually changed my mind on this course - it's actually pretty good, and comparisons with Dendermonde are unfair; it's produced two excellent races, even with the expected winners. I'd have no problem with it staying on the calendar. Just move it to a month earlier, so more of the top riders turn up.
Pieterse should need to figure out a strategy in advance to beat Van Empel when the course isn’t technically decisive enough. I believe Van Empel will win every time when Pieterse goes head to head with her just on power and grit,
'Technically a level above' is stretching it a bit. It's true, Puck has an advantage, but in some parts Fem is already better (like riding through the sand) and in others she's quickly catching up. I think she's already remarkably good for someone who has only done two full seasons of cross. In MTB that inexperience is probably even more apparent, combined with a bad position on the starting grid and you have no chance for a result.If PFP was any other rider, you'd tell her to forget challenging for the Worlds, as she's miles off. However, we're talking about PFP; we know her record at peaking for Worlds over the years; even this year Lecomte put over 2 mins 30 into her in the French MTB Cup 2 weeks before the Worlds. PFP then beat her by over 3mins in the Worlds.
As for Puck, I don't know how she can beat Fem on the majority of courses; technically she's a level above, but there aren't enough courses that suit her. It's the opposite on the MTB; were on the World Cup courses she has put minutes into Fem. And that is one of the reasons I suspect we don't see more top MTB-ers bothering with CX.....It's better suited to road riders.
What strategy do you suggest?