Let's first see if Pidcock can rival Iserbyt before putting him next to van Aert & van der Poel. Last year he got his ass handed to him throughout the entire season by Iserbyt, except for his impressive showing at the WCC. I'm sure Iserbyt hasn't peaked yet (not in his career, nor this season) so for the moment i think he's still the most likely candidate to really put the pressure on Wout & Mathieu. Aerts will surely have his moments (as always) and i'm glad to see Sweeck back in the game. We might see a less impressive van der Poel (with a bigger focus on the road season and less cross races to "get into the groove" compared to last year, which was already less dominant than it was the year before) and some better opposition with both Iserbyt and Pidcock narrowing the gap, plus Sweeck & Vantourenhout getting more constant results so far this year, which could lead to a bigger "teamwork" factor than we have seen the past few years.
I'm also glad van der Haar is showing signs of life (though the past two weekends it wasn't that great), always liked him and his "all in" style when he's on his day.
I'm not a fan of Aerts (as i've stated before) and while i agree Iserbyt may be a bit of a twerp (which also goes for Pidcock imho) i do like it that he's showing the brass and balls to claim a race (even if it means hitting a brick wall). He also showed he had to nerve to dare van der Poel last year, even if Mathieu was clearly still out of his league. At least he tried. I can respect that. Not starting a race with the idea to fight for second best.
By social media, do you mean the drivel at WF?
***
Just noticed Tiz is now doing CX as well?