Oncearunner8
BANNED
- Dec 10, 2009
- 312
- 0
- 0
Dr. Maserati said:I am suprised ChrisE did not take you to task for calling him a sh*t.....![]()
The night is still early in his house trailer.
Dr. Maserati said:I am suprised ChrisE did not take you to task for calling him a sh*t.....![]()
Dr. Maserati said:I am suprised ChrisE did not take you to task for calling him a sh*t.....![]()
Oncearunner8 said:The night is still early in his house trailer.
elizab said:What are the chances there is the Thyroid hormone T3 involved?
http://www.articlesbase.com/supplem...nbuterol-fat-burning-94407.html#axzz0lt5uqaOt
elizab said:What are the chances there is the Thyroid hormone T3 involved?
BroDeal said:Pretty high. There are several drugs that BBers typically combine with Clen to increase its effectiveness or extend the length of time that Clen works. I don't know if any of those drugs are banned.
Clean does not sound like a good drug to use if you expect to be tested. A lot of the BB sites say that the half life is ten hours. Others say its elimination is biphasic; some is eliminated quickly with a ten hour half life and the rest is eliminated more slowly over several days. You take it every day, so if you are in the "on" cycle, which typically lasts two to four weeks, then you are sure to test positive.
Race Radio said:Paid for her testimony? Is this the latest myth team Armstrong is trying to invent? Emma never testified in anything. Her interviews with Walsh were free, although he did help with her legal costs after publication
Armstrong tested positive for synthetic cortisone.
Joey_J said:http://competitorradio.competitor.com/2007/07/149david-walsh-part-2/
43 minutes into this, Walsh gets into EO’R. He tells all that he paid EO’R to be a source for his book. He also admits he lied about it when asked if he’d done so. He gives a heart-wrenching justification but at no time does he say anything about legal costs. Paying for sources in not a good thing. Lying about it even worse. And RR, your credibility is on the ropes too.
And no, LA did not test positive for cortisone in 99
Joey_J said:http://competitorradio.competitor.com/2007/07/149david-walsh-part-2/
And no, LA did not test positive for cortisone in 99
luckyboy said:HahaInstead of podium predicting, we should have picked which team would have the most positives this season
![]()
Was Emma not called to give a deposition in the SCA case against Lance?Joey_J said:http://competitorradio.competitor.com/2007/07/149david-walsh-part-2/
43 minutes into this, Walsh gets into EO’R. He tells all that he paid EO’R to be a source for his book. He also admits he lied about it when asked if he’d done so. He gives a heart-wrenching justification but at no time does he say anything about legal costs. Paying for sources in not a good thing. Lying about it even worse. And RR, your credibility is on the ropes too.
And no, LA did not test positive for cortisone in 99
craig1985 said:Hang on, what caused E'OR to speak out in the first place?
Joey_J said:http://competitorradio.competitor.com/2007/07/149david-walsh-part-2/
43 minutes into this, Walsh gets into EO’R. He tells all that he paid EO’R to be a source for his book. He also admits he lied about it when asked if he’d done so. He gives a heart-wrenching justification but at no time does he say anything about legal costs. Paying for sources in not a good thing. Lying about it even worse. And RR, your credibility is on the ropes too.
And no, LA did not test positive for cortisone in 99
Race Radio said:Armstrong tested positive for Cortisone, if he had not he would not have needed the back dated TUE. Pretty simple, even you can understand it.
Joey_J said:http://competitorradio.competitor.com/2007/07/149david-walsh-part-2/
43 minutes into this, Walsh gets into EO’R. He tells all that he paid EO’R to be a source for his book. He also admits he lied about it when asked if he’d done so. He gives a heart-wrenching justification but at no time does he say anything about legal costs. Paying for sources in not a good thing. Lying about it even worse. And RR, your credibility is on the ropes too.
And no, LA did not test positive for cortisone in 99
Alpe d'Huez said:The idea of him being a sacrificial lamb to me are silly. It makes much more sense for RS to have no riders come out positive than toss one away to show they are combating doping. Though I'm sure they'll leave him out to dry. They would probably with every rider on the team except one (no prizes for the correct guess).