The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Considering he's not carrying much if any excess body weight the kg's he'd be dropping would be muscle, that would certainly rob him of power so I seriously doubt he'd be winning everything. possibly he would become a top 10 GC rider but I doubt he would dominateportugal11 said:Sagan is more talented than merckx. If sagan dropped 10 kilograms, he could win everything except paris roubaix. he has a great recovery, last year, he was in all breaks in third week.
Not really, what Sagan needs to win GTs is to change his training approach, practise time trialing and go to altitude training camps. His weight is okay.portugal11 said:Sagan is more talented than merckx. If sagan dropped 10 kilograms, he could win everything except paris roubaix. he has a great recovery, last year, he was in all breaks in third week.
Not sure that's a very fair comparison. Sagan is a 75kg sprinter with good skills as a rouleur; Valverde is a 62kg climber with great abilities as a puncheur and a fast finish. He couldn't chase down most of the attacks and still challenge; no rider who is successful in the Ardennes or GTs could do that.Red Rick said:Reason why Valverde gets so many top placings that are not wins: He's too passive and lets the winning move go, wins groups sprint for good placing
Reason why Sagan gets so many top placings that are not wins: He does the selection, chases down most of the attacks, completely makes the race when usually everone's looking at him and then when they arrive at the finish he's too tired to win the sprint.
Red Rick said:Reason why Valverde gets so many top placings that are not wins: He's too passive and lets the winning move go, wins groups sprint for good placing
Reason why Sagan gets so many top placings that are not wins: He does the selection, chases down most of the attacks, completely makes the race when usually everone's looking at him and then when they arrive at the finish he's too tired to win the sprint.
DFA123 said:Not sure that's a very fair comparison. Sagan is a 75kg sprinter with good skills as a rouleur; Valverde is a 62kg climber with great abilities as a puncheur and a fast finish. He couldn't chase down most of the attacks and still challenge; no rider who is successful in the Ardennes or GTs could do that.Red Rick said:Reason why Valverde gets so many top placings that are not wins: He's too passive and lets the winning move go, wins groups sprint for good placing
Reason why Sagan gets so many top placings that are not wins: He does the selection, chases down most of the attacks, completely makes the race when usually everone's looking at him and then when they arrive at the finish he's too tired to win the sprint.
CheckMyPecs said:Not really, what Sagan needs to win GTs is to change his training approach, practise time trialing and go to altitude training camps. His weight is okay.portugal11 said:Sagan is more talented than merckx. If sagan dropped 10 kilograms, he could win everything except paris roubaix. he has a great recovery, last year, he was in all breaks in third week.
He does make attacks in big races though; he's won FW numerous times in recent years by taking the initiative - same in San Sebastian and Roma Maxima in recent years. He won LBL last year by chasing down all attacks in the final 2km and still winning the sprint. He's also made attacks in Strade Bianche and countless stage races (sometimes winning, sometimes not). It's just not so easy when you are so heavily marked, that everyone will work to chase you down. Likewise, in a group of 5/6 everyone expects him to chase everything down and, unless he's on absolutely top form (like when he won LBL and FW) it's just not feasible. It's a lot harder for Valverde to win a big race than someone like Martin or Yates who can slip away while everyone looks at each other.Cannibal72 said:DFA123 said:Not sure that's a very fair comparison. Sagan is a 75kg sprinter with good skills as a rouleur; Valverde is a 62kg climber with great abilities as a puncheur and a fast finish. He couldn't chase down most of the attacks and still challenge; no rider who is successful in the Ardennes or GTs could do that.Red Rick said:Reason why Valverde gets so many top placings that are not wins: He's too passive and lets the winning move go, wins groups sprint for good placing
Reason why Sagan gets so many top placings that are not wins: He does the selection, chases down most of the attacks, completely makes the race when usually everone's looking at him and then when they arrive at the finish he's too tired to win the sprint.
Valverde doesn't need to chase down *every* attack. Sagan does, but as RR points out that's something of a tactical mistake. What Valverde needs to do is occasionally make some attacks himself.
Oh c'mon, you can't mean this seriously.CheckMyPecs said:Not really, what Sagan needs to win GTs is to change his training approach, practise time trialing and go to altitude training camps. His weight is okay.portugal11 said:Sagan is more talented than merckx. If sagan dropped 10 kilograms, he could win everything except paris roubaix. he has a great recovery, last year, he was in all breaks in third week.
El Pistolero said:Also to further illustrate how Valverde lacks big wins compared to the other 3:
Gilbert has won:
World Championship Road Race in 2012
Giro di Lombardia in 2009 and 2010
Liège-Bastogne-Liège in 2011
Flèche Wallone in 2011
Amstel Gold Race in 2010, 2011 and 2014
Clasica San Sebastian in 2011
Grand Prix de Quebec in 2011
Brabantse Pijl in 2011 and 2014
Omloop het Volk in 2006 and 2008
Paris-Tours in 2008 and 2009
Strade Bianche in 2011 (not a WT race, but I think everyone can agree that this race is rated highly by the peloton)
Belgian National Road Race Championships (unlike the Spanish one, this one is prestigious): 2011 and 2016
5 Vuelta stages, 3 Giro stages and one Tour stage (here he lacks a bit admittedly)
Tour of Beijing in 2014 (well, it's World Tour I suppose... lol)
He also podiumed Milan-San Remo and the Ronde van Vlaanderen, which means he was on the podium for 4 of the five Monuments. No other active cyclist has done this.
El Pistolero said:DFA123 said:Lol, you criticize Valverde for not turning his talent into enough wins. And then pick the only rider in the peloton who is more expert than him at finishing on the 2nd step of the podium.El Pistolero said:dacooley said:contador
valverde
boonen
cancellara
El Pistolero said:This is what Gilbert said about Valverde: "I don't understand him. I think he aims for the World Tour Ranking and not victories. He finished four times as number one on the ranking, maybe it means a lot to him."
He continues:
"Winning remains the only goal. I don't ride for places of honor. I'm not interested in the second, third or fourth place. That equals losing. Maybe I'll count my podium places in ten years from now, but now I don't care."
hm, froome is a disgrace of cycling, valverde doesn't have a winning mentality, all the riders suffers from lack of charisma, etc.. how many riders do you tolerate? probably 2. sagan and gilbert
Sagan, Nibali, Contador, Boonen, Cancellara and Gilbert are the riders I respect the most. Don't get me wrong: I was always cheering against Cancellara winning anything, but I did respect him. They all have an unparalleled desire to win races.
His winner's mentality is undeniable. Those second places in the Tour contribute to his wins in the green jersey. One day he might be the only record holder of green jersey wins. What unique record does Valverde have? Most FW wins? Ok, I'll take the green jersey over that. Sagan often becomes second because he wastes too much energy before the sprint, Valverde often becomes second because he starts wheelsucking the chasers once the winning move has been made. That's the difference between them.
Mr.White said:El Pistolero said:Also to further illustrate how Valverde lacks big wins compared to the other 3:
Gilbert has won:
World Championship Road Race in 2012
Giro di Lombardia in 2009 and 2010
Liège-Bastogne-Liège in 2011
Flèche Wallone in 2011
Amstel Gold Race in 2010, 2011 and 2014
Clasica San Sebastian in 2011
Grand Prix de Quebec in 2011
Brabantse Pijl in 2011 and 2014
Omloop het Volk in 2006 and 2008
Paris-Tours in 2008 and 2009
Strade Bianche in 2011 (not a WT race, but I think everyone can agree that this race is rated highly by the peloton)
Belgian National Road Race Championships (unlike the Spanish one, this one is prestigious): 2011 and 2016
5 Vuelta stages, 3 Giro stages and one Tour stage (here he lacks a bit admittedly)
Tour of Beijing in 2014 (well, it's World Tour I suppose... lol)
He also podiumed Milan-San Remo and the Ronde van Vlaanderen, which means he was on the podium for 4 of the five Monuments. No other active cyclist has done this.
Valverde has won:
Liege-Bastogne-LIege in 2006, 2008 and 2015
Fleche Wallonne in 2006, 2014, 2015 and 2016
Clasica San Sebastian in 2008 and 2014
Roma Maxima in 2014
GP Miguel Indurain in 2014
Paris-Camembert in 2008
Klasika Primavera in 2003, 2004 and 2009
Spanish Championships in 2008 and 2015
in terms of one-day races (there are some 5-6 spanish races more)
He also has won six medals at WC RR. No other active cyclist has done this. And no other non-active cyclist has done this!
As you see, Valverde's one-day palmares (and I listed only wins) is pretty similar with Gilbert's and I rank them pretty equal. And if I throw in his GT and other stage races results this comparison becomes laughable!
PremierAndrew said:I'd take a rainbow jersey over 6 non-gold WC medals any day
El Pistolero said:PremierAndrew said:I'd take a rainbow jersey over 6 non-gold WC medals any day
Yeah, glad to see someone agree. It's crazy how some people seem to value 6 losses higher than a win.
July fansEl Pistolero said:@Mr White
The green jersey is a grueling three week battle in the biggest cycling race of the world, while FW is a boring uphill sprint. Yes, I know what I'd rather win. Did you watch today's stage? I hope you have.
El Pistolero said:Mr.White said:El Pistolero said:Also to further illustrate how Valverde lacks big wins compared to the other 3:
Gilbert has won:
World Championship Road Race in 2012
Giro di Lombardia in 2009 and 2010
Liège-Bastogne-Liège in 2011
Flèche Wallone in 2011
Amstel Gold Race in 2010, 2011 and 2014
Clasica San Sebastian in 2011
Grand Prix de Quebec in 2011
Brabantse Pijl in 2011 and 2014
Omloop het Volk in 2006 and 2008
Paris-Tours in 2008 and 2009
Strade Bianche in 2011 (not a WT race, but I think everyone can agree that this race is rated highly by the peloton)
Belgian National Road Race Championships (unlike the Spanish one, this one is prestigious): 2011 and 2016
5 Vuelta stages, 3 Giro stages and one Tour stage (here he lacks a bit admittedly)
Tour of Beijing in 2014 (well, it's World Tour I suppose... lol)
He also podiumed Milan-San Remo and the Ronde van Vlaanderen, which means he was on the podium for 4 of the five Monuments. No other active cyclist has done this.
Valverde has won:
Liege-Bastogne-LIege in 2006, 2008 and 2015
Fleche Wallonne in 2006, 2014, 2015 and 2016
Clasica San Sebastian in 2008 and 2014
Roma Maxima in 2014
GP Miguel Indurain in 2014
Paris-Camembert in 2008
Klasika Primavera in 2003, 2004 and 2009
Spanish Championships in 2008 and 2015
in terms of one-day races (there are some 5-6 spanish races more)
He also has won six medals at WC RR. No other active cyclist has done this. And no other non-active cyclist has done this!
As you see, Valverde's one-day palmares (and I listed only wins) is pretty similar with Gilbert's and I rank them pretty equal. And if I throw in his GT and other stage races results this comparison becomes laughable!
How on earth can you rank their one-day palmares equal? Gilbert has won more prestigious one-day races, simple fact. The Spanish National Road Race is just the Movistar gift festival anyway. He doesn't even honor the jersey by wearing it proudly. And you're including very small races like Paris-Camembert and Klasika Primavera?
Gilbert has plenty of small one-day races wins as well that I left out: GP de Wallonie twice, GP Fourmies, Trofeo Mallorca, Trofeo Soler, GP Samyn, Coppa Sabatini, Giro del Piemonte twice, GP Pino Cerami, Vuelta a Murcia (now a one-day race), Tour de Haut-Var (one-day race back then), Trophée des Grimpeurs and the Polynormande. Omloop het Nieuwsblad and Strade Bianche will be WT next year for a reason: they've always been very prestigious.
Yeah, Valverde has a Vuelta, but that doesn't beat a World Championship to me. A Vuelta win earns 170 UCI points and a WC win earns you 200 UCI points.
DFA123 said:July fansEl Pistolero said:@Mr White
The green jersey is a grueling three week battle in the biggest cycling race of the world, while FW is a boring uphill sprint. Yes, I know what I'd rather win. Did you watch today's stage? I hope you have.
Valverde actually has three GT points jersey wins himself. But I guess they are irrelevant because they don't suit your agenda.
In that case, if Froome wins the Tour this year, you would graciously accept that he has a better Palmares and is a better rider than Contador I presume.El Pistolero said:DFA123 said:July fansEl Pistolero said:@Mr White
The green jersey is a grueling three week battle in the biggest cycling race of the world, while FW is a boring uphill sprint. Yes, I know what I'd rather win. Did you watch today's stage? I hope you have.
Valverde actually has three GT points jersey wins himself. But I guess they are irrelevant because they don't suit your agenda.
They're irrelevant because nobody cares about the points jersey in the Vuelta. It's a joke competition. Accepting that the Tour is miles ahead of the Vuelta doesn't make you a July fan, but a realistic person who doesn't live in denial. Sagan will soon have 5 green jersey wins if he doesn't crash out.
DFA123 said:In that case, if Froome wins the Tour this year, you would graciously accept that he has a better Palmares and is a better rider than Contador I presume.El Pistolero said:DFA123 said:July fansEl Pistolero said:@Mr White
The green jersey is a grueling three week battle in the biggest cycling race of the world, while FW is a boring uphill sprint. Yes, I know what I'd rather win. Did you watch today's stage? I hope you have.
Valverde actually has three GT points jersey wins himself. But I guess they are irrelevant because they don't suit your agenda.
They're irrelevant because nobody cares about the points jersey in the Vuelta. It's a joke competition. Accepting that the Tour is miles ahead of the Vuelta doesn't make you a July fan, but a realistic person who doesn't live in denial. Sagan will soon have 5 green jersey wins if he doesn't crash out.
El Pistolero said:@Mr White
The green jersey is a grueling three week battle in the biggest cycling race of the world, while FW is a boring uphill sprint. Yes, I know what I'd rather win. Did you watch today's stage? I hope you have.
Mr.White said:El Pistolero said:@Mr White
The green jersey is a grueling three week battle in the biggest cycling race of the world, while FW is a boring uphill sprint. Yes, I know what I'd rather win. Did you watch today's stage? I hope you have.
Every points competition is a joke, including Tour's and can't be compared to any big classic which Fleche Wallonne certainly is! I also know what I'd rather win, and it's not some stupid classification for sure! I guess you started to hate FW when Valverde started to win there?