rhubroma said:
This has to be the best statement of 2015 so far!
You see, I am self-critical. Always been, in various threads. You further know from early last year (world politics thread, Ukraine "revolution") that I like short "hammer the message home" posts. You and I know that many people don´t like to read long detailed posts. Even though Merckxindex posts are well-thought, I guess many skip them because of their length.
But we both come to the same conclusions.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
You get mad about about a call of a muezzin but wonder why people believe that you are afraid of foreigners?
I am not afraid of foreigners. Please re-read my posts. I don´t like a certain group of foreigners that destroy our culture. Crystal clear. Don´t twist my posts.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
I mean you bemoan the decline of the western world and believe islam/moslems are responsible for it.
Not only them. Please remember I said the islam is the 2nd worst religion. Plus I called out the Femi-Nazis (see the "Cosby threads"; I gave detailed infos and links why it is so), and then some more...
Rechtschreibfehler said:
That means you are afraid of them.
So be it. And you know what? Better be afraid, than running into desaster unprepared.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
You also state that a "multi kulti ideology" is bad and brainwashing people so they don't understand (in contrast to you who has seen the light) whats going on, and that "multi-kulti" is actually bad for them.
Exactly. Only that many others see it the same way as I. Have a look at the friendly Pegida demonstrants who got attack(ed) by politicans, MSM, christian churches, business people, "celebs" and others that fight against their own tribe (original germans). They are also afraid, but with different reasons than us who want to defend our culture and nation.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
So you are against more than once culture at once, and you fear the consequences, but still you claim not to be afraid of foreigners and foreign cultures. How can that not be true?
I am not against foreigners, I am against the islam. Crystal clear. Not my mistake that most immigrants come from countries like the Turkey (with 96+ % of people beliving in the book of evil).
All my italian, brazilian, american, etc. friends are welcome. I stated that before also!
Rechtschreibfehler said:
Or do you simply don't know what xenophobic means and equate it with "nazi"? It simply means "afraid of foreigners". It doesn't mean "hating foreigners" and it doesn't mean "wanting to harm foreigners".
If I go by translation, xenophobic means "ausländerfeindlich". And that is something I am not. That is crystal clear!
Rechtschreibfehler said:
The reason no one here is taking you serious,
How you know that? Did you ask every single poster? May many don´t like my style (short "hammer home messages"), but many agree with me in general (like Merckxindex, Glenn Wilson, Bavarianrider, Descender, and many more). I also know that when I talk with people in detail (something I can´t do here, because my time is presicious, thus I don´t like to write books as posts). No matter where they come from (outside of Moslems OFC, I try to stay away from them as far as possible).
Rechtschreibfehler said:
isn't because all of us are brainwashed, even though you obviously like to believe taht.
Yes I do. Because it´s obvious. Just have a look at the Pegida discussion for example. Every single comment section is closed at the big newspapers. The friendly demonstrants get called "nazis", "mischpoke", and other insults. There is so much more...
Clear propaganda against the original peaceful hard working population. It´s disgusting!
Rechtschreibfehler said:
The reason is that you don't use arguments that are worthy of the term. There are no conclusions in anything you say. You just state "Evil politically corred femi nazis" and than post some kind of stuff, and believe that to be an argument.
I use more arguments (give mumbers and links) than any political leader gave/gives in the Pegida discussion. See last chaper.
They don´t argue at all!
Rechtschreibfehler said:
Well it isn't. If you state an entire religion and all of it's followers are evil and try to back it up with an article about terrorism.
They are evil. That is a fact. Read the quran. It´s not peaceful at all. The IS and other terror states & organisations just go by the book. In their minds they do nothing wrong. Can´t blame them.
There is no good or bad islam. There is only the islam with it´s sick book of the wrong prophet.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
That's not an argument. You need to explain why that is evidence of your point.
I posted many links, and some very though (30 like?) suras. I gave hints. The rest is up to the readers. It´s all up to them to get more infos and educated. I am not here to write books. I just offer food for thought.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
Something at wich you fail every single time.
I don´t.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
"See, see! There it is! You must see it! I am right!" That's not forming an argument, that's simply an emotional reaction.
I am as emotional as the politicans calling us "mischpoke". Difference is: We have points. They don´t. That´s why the "see, see" is good. And that, in context with suras and hard numbers I post, can form a opinion. If I can just change one persons view of the islam intruders, that´s a win for me!
Rechtschreibfehler said:
You have a fixed view of the world,
Maybe. But I am no different than those who have a
dangerous fixed view (because they rule politics) like Cem Özemir, and one of the most disliked woman in Germany: Claudia Roth.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
and you take anything as prove that is fitting you're predjudices.
Facts and hard numbers don´t lie. Sorry if you don´t like that. The truth hurts, I know.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
You don't take examples, examine them, analyse them into bits to draw your conclusions. The conclusions are already made up.
No! My opinions are well formed over three decades seeing the moslems overtaking and spoiling our country. The examples I give are just a tiny tiny amount of the whole picture.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
The world has to be the way you see it. So you take what is fitting and discard everything as illusion that isn't. Because it has to be like this, it cannot be like that. That's a classical "Sein/Sollen" mistake, executed in an extremly crude way.
Not me (!!!) using this tactic, but the tactics used by our "leaders". Not only in the Pegida discussion, but also the Euro disaster, the Ukraine "revolution", etc...
Rechtschreibfehler said:
And herein lies another problem. Because you construct everything around a normative scheme of your view of the world, you are unable to deal with conflicting parts of reality.
Again wrong. It´s the other way around. See last chapter...
Rechtschreibfehler said:
There cannot be a muslim that is not lying about his liberalism. There cannot be peaceful and violent tendencies within the same framework of an overlying religions believe system. Everything can only have a single property in the way you analyse things.
The quran is a book full of violence, hate and misogyny. Either a muslim (under the fear of death) withdrawals from this religion or he follows it. There is no good/bad quran. There is only
the quran, with all it´s ugly consequences. That is a fact I can´t change. The only chance for the islam becoming peaceful is to go trou a reformation process. But there is no tiny sign that it will ever happen.
Like you can´t say there are good/bad followers who still believe in Hitler and his "Mein Kampf".
Either you are pregnant or not. There is no in between.
Rechtschreibfehler said:
To make it short at the end: no one is taking you seriously because you don't adhere to the logical principles of argumentation. Not because they are brainwashed.
Wrong. See above.
frenchfry said:
Yesterday Foxxybrown’s posts on this thread seemed like over the top rants.
Today they seem almost prophetic.
My condolences to all the innocent dying of another coward act by moslems. If there is anything good, it´s my hope more people wake up and fight against this misanthropic religion. We need every single brave european to hold them in check (or at best get them out of their religion) before it´s too late. But what we certainly don´t need is more of them.