movingtarget said:
And last year's Porte was much better than this year's Nieve. Porte might struggle more in the first week due to his interruptions this year but the sign's are, that he is improving. If Froome wins and Porte finishes nowhere what do Sky care, it's all about the win. Sky will give Porte another shot at the Giro next year where Quintana probably won't ride, which will increase his chances and Uran might do the Tour next year as well, so he will get another chance as team leader. Don't see them trying again with Wiggins if he is still in the team that is.
murali said:
Nieve is a good rider. but he is yet to prove himself in a stage race, let alone a GT.
Porte is a proven winner of stage race.
Porte is among the most under-used riders. He ought to have been in this Giro, instead of Sky sending a C team to a GT. Without DB's bias tpwards froome, porte would have podiumed this tour.
I responded to a discussion about Porte's GC prospects in the upcoming Tour. Obviously Sky doesn't care, as long as Froome wins. Which probably won't happen now that Contador went full *** again, but anyway.
Porte was much better than Nieve on most days, yes. But more inconsistent. Point being he wasn't GT leader material last year. Even less so than Nieve, whose GT results so far at least show some consistency.
Paris - Nice means jack when the Tour and the Giro are concerned. Tony Martin won P-N, for fukc's sake. Other, harder, one-week stage races are more relevant, of course, but only up to a point. Even a Dauphine top-5 or a TdS win doesn't tell you that much, IMO.