Rock & Roll will never die, but rim brakes are on the outs.

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 18, 2009
775
0
0
King Boonen said:
I'm guessing all you guys are writing these replys with a quill, passing them on to someone technically proficient enough to post them and waiting for answers by telegram?

What is this "quill" thing of which you speak? A tele-what? All I need is a little paint, a cave wall, some flint points to keep the saber-toothed at bay, and I'm good.
 
Giuseppe Magnetico said:
What's the matter, did I touch a nerve? Hey, at least I'm original, I've seen you use those very same lines on others when you start to loose grip on the situation. Very good BroDumb, I'll have you chased out of the bikes and gear section of the forum just like before, I think multiple times over the years, so predictable this one. But go ahead and flame on like the raging @sshole you are, we need more ban material. We'll see how long your stupid trolling goes again, I actually have a life out of here and have to get back to work.

Wow. Legend in his own mind. I think the only person who has been chased out of here with a severe case of butthurt is you, who has often gone off in a huff when a thread did not go your way. And Boeing a "notorious thread destroyer"? Really? LOL. That is a stretch even for your mischaracterizations, which seem to be the bedrock of your new argumentative personality. You have lost it, dude. Making a low rent copy of someone else's anonym does not make you a Damiano Machiavelli.

You initiated this thread with the specific purpose of starting an argument so you could attack a strawman, ignoring what anyone actually wrote and instead railing against your own personal bogeymen. Now you are angry your planned result occurred.

Sorry if you cannot understand that people might want to wait for development of a technology to stabilize, but industry loyalists like you were extolling the virtues of ISIS BBs a few years ago so I guess it is understandable.
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
Giuseppe Magnetico said:
Ah, I see BroDeal's shadow has arrived. If I recall correct, out of all of us you're the one treading on the thinnest ice. You looking for a ban too Boring?

You pay for this, but they give you that
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
Wallace said:
What is this "quill" thing of which you speak? A tele-what? All I need is a little paint, a cave wall, some flint points to keep the saber-toothed at bay, and I'm good.

Quill is a stem that RVD still uses
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
Guys guys guys. I go away for a week on business, and come back to schoolyard fighting.

Looks like some folks are having a bad day, and it is perhaps time for all involved to take a voluntary week off, and cool off.

I'll have to take a look at what's been going on. Obviously some rules have been contravened. I can't stay on the forum tonight - but if I need to hand out suspensions, I'll do it. If you are having a bad day, and being a general grouch, I would appreciate an open apology and edit your own insults out. It'll save me from coming back and doing for ya. We all understand bad days. If you're just having a bad week, well, we all feel for ya.

I also understand we don't all hold the highest opinions of all the other board participants. Keep that to yourself. We don't need public spatting, it serves no purpose whatsoever. You don't even feel better when you've spouted it all out - not for longer than 30 seconds, anyway. We have a rep as being a free-wheeling board - but you can be free-wheeling and not pick a fight.

I'll see you guys again in a day or two. I already took longer than I meant to for today.
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
I beg to differ. We are not fighting at all This is how we talk to each other. we only insult our friends. the others we ignore. that's the way its been for a few years now. the other mods know this and its news to you? all good. thats the way guys talk to each other in the peloton and on training rides too btw. so you must ride alone? n'est Pas?

a lot of inside joking going one here. read between the lines ad we are all good. bro deal and GPrdv remember stuff I posted years ago like old school and throw it back at me and I love that about these guys

peace

back to the lyrics in context...' there's more to a picture than meets the eye, hey hey my my.'. sing with me H
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
Boeing said:
I beg to differ. We are not fighting at all This is how we talk to each other. we only insult our friends. the others we ignore. that's the way its been for a few years now. the other mods know this and its news to you? all good. thats the way guys talk to each other in the peloton and on training rides too btw. so you must ride alone? n'est Pas?

a lot of inside joking going one here. read between the lines ad we are all good. bro deal and GPrdv remember stuff I posted years ago like old school and throw it back at me and I love that about these guys

peace

back to the lyrics in context...' there's more to a picture than meets the eye, hey hey my my.'. sing with me H

No, it is not on. Period. Clear violations of the rules are clear violations of the rules. Nor is everyone involved is as happy as you would like the other readers to think. Nor is there any reason to assume that because you've gotten away with it before that it should continue.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
King Boonen said:
In terms of rim brakes its

'And once your gone, you can never come back"


Idk - admittedly, we never see rod brakes anymore, but there is a reason that rim brakes are dominant and will likely stay in the market well past the lifetime of anyone posting here. Simply this, they are relatively efficient, and they are cheaper to manufacture and maintain.

While it is an interesting point about grinding away rim surface, that argument is, for the most part, overrated. For users of steel or alloy rims, the relative lifetime of the rim is not shortened sufficiently by this action to make the added expense of discs worth the cost. Nor is the life expectancy of the wheel shortened much beyond what the useful life of the bicycle or wheel is without said wear.

Unless the rider is allowing sand or grit to inhabit the space between the brakes and the rim - which for an "average" rider would account as abuse. The cycling disciplines, and their disciples, that regularly bathe in mud and sand are few in comparison to the market overall.

Now - we do have some mfr reps out there - if any of them want to correct me on this - or if somebody has access to industry stats that are counter to this - I'll be happy to listen.
 
Mar 10, 2009
1,295
0
0
When I consider the years it took me to go from rim brakes to disk brakes on my MTB I figure it will be a decade or more before I own a disk brake road bike if ever. Sure if I bought a CX bike I'd go straight to disk or if I was looking for a complete road bike I might wait another year for a fully developed road group with hydraulic disk brakes. In the meantime I have 1 set of high end wheels that need new rims. That alone will cost $400 but I do the build. A couple of years from now I have 2 sets of wheels that will need new rims and the could be 7 to 800 for those pairs. That is a lot of disk brake rotors. It is far cheaper to continue with the bikes and wheels I have but eventually I think all bikes will just come with disks. Most of the silly crap in this thread is about the change and a lot less about whether disk brakes are good brakes.
Until road racing allows disk brakes it will be a much slower transition but I can hardly believe that the transition won't come.
 
@Hiero2

Rim brakes will remain dominant only as long as people are unwilling to buy a new frame/bike with disc breaks.

Cable disc breaks in mountain biking are standard on bike costing as little as £350. Yes, they may not be brilliant at that price range but then neither are rim brakes in that range. They do have increased stopping power compared to comparable rim brakes and are actually easier to maintain (it takes me less than a minute to change a set of pads on disc breaks, it's quicker than changing a tube trail-side). Hydraulics for as little as £450.

The grinding of a rim might seem overrated but in reality it's completely sensible, why run the risk? Also, removing the need for a breaking surface may allow developers a chance to improve rim design.

Disc brakes really aren't that much more expensive and hydraulic ones require little to no maintenance, I've known people who run the same brakes for years without needing to do anything other than switch the pads when they are worn.

Overheating always gets brought up but it's just not going to be an issue. Yes, the discs are smaller than the rims but they also aren't as well insulated and the dissipate heat much better. They also don't dissipate heat into the inner tube (if you are using them). Over-heating of the oil is unlikely and bent rotors due to heat is extremely difficult to believe. One mountain biker I know is also a power lifter so really does weigh about 300lbs, he's never bent a disc through breaking and he rides downhill as well as trails.

I accept that there no-doubt needs to be some work on the system at the break lever end to make servicing easy, but to be honest, bleeding my disc break is much much easier than replacing a cable on rims ever was.

Discs are better in every single way and the price difference is already small (for mountain bikes, it will take a while for road bikes).

Now if the UCI could stop it's silliness and in-fighting they could get on with approving them for road use.
 
Master50 said:
When I consider the years it took me to go from rim brakes to disk brakes on my MTB I figure it will be a decade or more before I own a disk brake road bike if ever. Sure if I bought a CX bike I'd go straight to disk or if I was looking for a complete road bike I might wait another year for a fully developed road group with hydraulic disk brakes. In the meantime I have 1 set of high end wheels that need new rims. That alone will cost $400 but I do the build. A couple of years from now I have 2 sets of wheels that will need new rims and the could be 7 to 800 for those pairs. That is a lot of disk brake rotors. It is far cheaper to continue with the bikes and wheels I have but eventually I think all bikes will just come with disks. Most of the silly crap in this thread is about the change and a lot less about whether disk brakes are good brakes.
Until road racing allows disk brakes it will be a much slower transition but I can hardly believe that the transition won't come.

We can get the conversation back to that then. I really can't see any downside of disc brakes, they are much better than rim brakes in every way.
 
King Boonen said:
We can get the conversation back to that then. I really can't see any downside of disc brakes, they are much better than rim brakes in every way.
They certainly are and I feel that the more they become available, the sooner we can get some kind of true hub standard. Imagine, no more worrying about 130mm hubs, 135mm hubs, non disk, centre lock disk, 6 bolt disk blah blah blah.

Being able to transfer wheels between a road bike, CX bike and 29'er with nothing but a tyre change would be a pretty handy feature...
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
Master50 said:
. . . Most of the silly crap in this thread is about the change and a lot less about whether disk brakes are good brakes.
Until road racing allows disk brakes it will be a much slower transition but I can hardly believe that the transition won't come.

King Boonen said:
@Hiero2

Rim brakes will remain dominant only as long as people are unwilling to buy a new frame/bike with disc breaks.
. . .
Discs are better in every single way and the price difference is already small (for mountain bikes, it will take a while for road bikes).
. . . .

42x16ss said:
They certainly are and I feel that the more they become available, the sooner we can get some kind of true hub standard. Imagine, no more worrying about 130mm hubs, 135mm hubs, non disk, centre lock disk, 6 bolt disk blah blah blah.

Being able to transfer wheels between a road bike, CX bike and 29'er with nothing but a tyre change would be a pretty handy feature...

I completely agree that much of the conversation is about "The Change". I also COMPLETELY agree that disc brakes will be mechanically superior in performance. But, just as you STILL see drum brakes on autos, you will continue, IMO, to see rim brakes on bicycles. The reason is financial - they are and will be cheaper. Disk brakes will become more competitive - and you are right, have already.

BUT, as Masters points out - he already has a stable of bikes. A heck of a lot of us do. And why get rid of a working stable because you want a new horseshoe? Most folks don't and won't want the hassle involved. So, again, you're RIGHT! It's just because a lot of folk don't want to go out and buy a new bike with discs! :D

And remember, the thread topic is twofold, and it is apparent in tlhe thread title.
1. Disc brakes are mechanically superior.
2. Rim brakes are on the way out.

And, it is only on the 2nd point that I find any reason to add a comment.
 
42x16ss said:
They certainly are and I feel that the more they become available, the sooner we can get some kind of true hub standard. Imagine, no more worrying about 130mm hubs, 135mm hubs, non disk, centre lock disk, 6 bolt disk blah blah blah.

Being able to transfer wheels between a road bike, CX bike and 29'er with nothing but a tyre change would be a pretty handy feature...

It hasn't happened in MTB discs, why do you think adding the much smaller road segment will induce some sort of wheel/hub 'standards?

Tab, ISO mounts, centerlock, 6 bolt, 135, various thru bolt hub options, blah, blah...

Thrubolt on a 900 gram road frame, brilliant. It'll happen.
 
Bustedknuckle said:
It hasn't happened in MTB discs, why do you think adding the much smaller road segment will induce some sort of wheel/hub 'standards?

Tab, ISO mounts, centerlock, 6 bolt, 135, various thru bolt hub options, blah, blah...

Thrubolt on a 900 gram road frame, brilliant. It'll happen.
Ok, it's a bit of a pipedream. Universality is the manufacturer's worst nightmare. Still, would be cool if someone had the b@lls to try and make it happen though, yeah?
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
42x16ss said:
Ok, it's a bit of a pipedream. Universality is the manufacturer's worst nightmare. Still, would be cool if someone had the b@lls to try and make it happen though, yeah?

And it is a nice pipedream, too! I sure wish we could see it. But I started riding (serious riding, not as a child) on 5-speed freewheels. Do you know how many dropout width changes there have been since then? Chain width changes?

It is a nuisance to me. For sure.

But from the mfr pov? Sometimes standards pay off for the mfrs, sometimes they don't. In this case, I would venture to say that differentiation is more profitable than standardization.
 
Jun 10, 2009
606
0
0
BroDeal said:
He should of picked better numbers, but the point is valid. 60-0 requires four times as much energy to be dissipated as 30-0. The rotors typically are ~40% of the weight of a light Al rim, so there will be a lot of heat being dumped into a much smaller amount of metal.

Except how often do you slow down from 60-0 on a typical road descent?
The rotors can take the heat just fine, I've seen my discs glowing red on night rides, without loss of brake function. Plus you're assuming the rims are metal rather than carbon - these may have higher mass, but are very poor conductors resulting in most of the thermal load remaining at the brake track, negating the argument of higher mass.
 

TRENDING THREADS