I beg to differ here.
Belief in the strong sense of the word is sensible only when not having credible evidence or evidence not being possible at all.
When you think something is true because it follows logicaly from some other facts or because you have evidence that support it with high certainty, then you don't need to believe, you can presume it or just be certain that it is true, because it follows logically from other "true facts" and you believe in logic.
Belief is 100% certainty with no evidence. If you ever want to get to 100% certainty based on evidence, you'll always need more evidence.
Evidence is a thing that makes other things more evident, evident means clear to understading... we can ask for more evidence untill we reach "self-evident fact" - a thing so clear to understanding that we do not question it, or ask for more evidence, but just accept it as true as it is - believe in it.
So the things we believe are the things that are self-evident (for us).
It's not only religion that works like that, mathemathics also has axioms that are regarded as self-evident without need or possibility for further basis (inside mathemathics).
If you go deep, there are only 3 ways to ground things... You either keep providing evidence for evidence ad infinitum, or you start to circle in your evidence of evidence or you say that some evidence is simply true without providing further evidence for it.
(I also object knowledge being justified true belief, but that can stay for another time)