Dear Wiggo said:
Some more blurb from 2008, including a Garmin team average:
That average means the range of values is .6 to 1.3. Ryder was a member of that team.
Someone better than me at stats can hopefully explain what 0.95 +/- 0.35 means, because an average back then of 1.6 sits outside that range of values, and I am sure Ryder's Hct has not increased since 2008, surely?
Yeh Ryder cops a bit too much heat relative to the others.
Vande Velde 2008 is completely off the charts. Never produced anything like it before (even with Schumi...) and nothing since (2009 was ok). His climbing was believable when you consider how outrageous the TT'ing was, **** me, a minute down on Schumacher and 44" on Cancellara from someone who had never done a good TT in his life before that year. Post-2009 he gives most of it away and only "peaks" in the comfort of North America.
Millar who in 2009 was climbing as well as he ever had as a doper, 11th on Ventoux! He keeps his TT'ing form, often being up for consideration as the "next best" after the big two. All the while prattling on about all the great things he's done since stopping doping. Pity he didn't actually "stop" until 2012 or thereabouts and look at his fantastic results since.
Let's not let Zabriskie and his US doping only policy get away either, absolutely horrific climbing on the continent but more than willing to turn up prepared on home turf. Again, climbed better than when he was a doper (well, a USPS doper, he was clean at Riis wasn't he?).
It says buckets that Tommy ****ing D is the most legit of the lot.