- Jul 10, 2012
- 421
- 5
- 9,285
Man the blood is really in the water now for the media, they aren't going to let this one go now .... a least not the ones who aren't owned by another foul mouthed australian midget
keeponrollin said:Man the blood is really in the water now for the media, they aren't going to let this one go now .... a least not the ones who aren't owned by another foul mouthed australian midget
keeponrollin said:Man the blood is really in the water now for the media, they aren't going to let this one go now .... a least not the ones who aren't owned by another foul mouthed australian midget
it's hard to imagine there isn't.thehog said:Not too hard to imagine there is also a doping program within BC.
ebandit said:dopers cuss....cussers dope...................obviousthehog said:Not too hard to imagine there is also a doping program within BC.
Mark L
"common knowledge in the UK in the 80's about him [Sutton] doping" viewtopic.php?p=1059724#p1059724
"The claims are specific and revolve around the injection of drugs at races when the employee rode for other teams. They come from three separate independent sources."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/othersports/article-2220801/Team-Sky-braced-departures.html#ixzz3dEJwO0pR
wow ..........really ...........just wow.....ebandit said:dopers cuss....cussers dope...................obviousthehog said:Not too hard to imagine there is also a doping program within BC.
Mark L
Good links Sniper. Thanks.sniper said:Brief recap of Sutton's doping:
An orbeas post earlier in this thread:"common knowledge in the UK in the 80's about him [Sutton] doping" viewtopic.php?p=1059724#p1059724
Daily Mail article (the subject is not explicitly mentioned, but it's hardly controversial that it's Sutton):"The claims are specific and revolve around the injection of drugs at races when the employee rode for other teams. They come from three separate independent sources."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/othersports/article-2220801/Team-Sky-braced-departures.html#ixzz3dEJwO0pR
Glenn_Wilson said:Good links Sniper. Thanks.sniper said:Brief recap of Sutton's doping:
An orbeas post earlier in this thread:"common knowledge in the UK in the 80's about him [Sutton] doping" viewtopic.php?p=1059724#p1059724
Daily Mail article (the subject is not explicitly mentioned, but it's hardly controversial that it's Sutton):"The claims are specific and revolve around the injection of drugs at races when the employee rode for other teams. They come from three separate independent sources."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/othersports/article-2220801/Team-Sky-braced-departures.html#ixzz3dEJwO0pR
Jacques (7 ch) said:...
They are good links, thanks. I just wondered if article 1 (the Mail) might not have been Sean Yates wriggling.
Loved the comment under that one:
Team Sky are setting the standards for the future. They are laying out their standards and behaviours for all to see. They are like others open to scandal by involvement with previous dopers but should be applauded for their zero tolerance policy. Not winning is better than cheating. Everybody is in danger in entanglement with previous misdemeanours and Sky are trying to distance themselves by rooting out all, both previous and today dopers.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/othersports/article-2220801/Team-Sky-braced-departures.html#ixzz47WuhPIas
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
“Apparently he has held me in his arms many times. I can tell you Shane has never thrown his arms around me.”
As for him helping decorate her house, she said: “That was Shane on a good day. My relationship with Shane was good before Beijing but notice he was talking about the lead-up to 2008. It would be interesting to ask how he was with me in the lead-up to London. That might be a different story.
“It’s all very well being supportive some of the time, but when you trust someone and they turn their back on you it’s the most heart-breaking thing they can do. Shane can be a great bloke, but not all the time and it’s a toss of the coin which side you get.”
Some athletes don’t mind the kind of encouragement that borders on bullying. They might even welcome it, if the treatment pushes them closer to their goal. And if, of course, it comes from a source whose harsh manner is balanced by a sensitivity to the nuances of their sport. Many of those in Sutton’s charge respected his profound knowledge as well as his commitment to their success. “He’s a mad dude, but I love him,” Millar said of Sutton this week. “I know he would run through a brick wall for me.”
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/may/06/shane-sutton-sergeant-major-commanding-officer-cycling-rio-2016Back in 2002, Sutton was a brilliant acquisition. His nous and drive were just what the emerging generation of British cyclists needed – but only in combination with Brailsford’s visionary management and the ability of Dr Steve Peters to soothe away an athlete’s self-doubt...
In any army, good regimental sergeant majors are worth their weight in gold, and for a dozen years Sutton was worth his weight in gold medals. But the qualities of a good RSM are not those of a commanding officer, who needs a gift for diplomacy and strategic thinking. The CO will ensure that the RSM’s methods of discipline and motivation are kept within the proper bounds. Those who elevated Sutton to a position that exposed his weaknesses must take responsibility for the events of the past fortnight, and for the possible consequences in Rio. So must Brailsford, whose unwillingness to create a women’s squad at Team Sky lies behind much of the support for Varnish’s act of revenge.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cycling/shane-sutton-and-i-two-words-he-always-brought-to-mind-were-nervous-energy-a7004286.htmlIn a world of high-budget sport where pr spin and ‘controlling the narrative’ have now become objectives sometimes as important as the results themselves, Shane Sutton - sometimes for better, sometimes, as has become dramatically obvious this week, for worse - has always been one to speak his mind.
“He is a no-nonsense, fantastic motivator, but he calls a spade a spade, too,” one former British professional rider who raced with Sutton in the 1980s and who knows him well, tells The Independent. “His ability to read a race is brilliant, particularly in terms of track cycling. I don’t think there’s a better person for track craft out there.”
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/boardman-british-cyclings-trial-by-press-has-been-disappointing/I was involved with Shane and everyone knew that he was a straight talker, no nonsense and that he could read a rider," he told Cyclingnews.
“I’ve been disappointed to see trial by press over the last week, which whatever you think of an individual, I don’t think that’s fair but now you have an inquiry underway so I’d say let it do its job and lets see what happens.
Robert21 said:Some athletes don’t mind the kind of encouragement that borders on bullying. They might even welcome it, if the treatment pushes them closer to their goal. And if, of course, it comes from a source whose harsh manner is balanced by a sensitivity to the nuances of their sport. Many of those in Sutton’s charge respected his profound knowledge as well as his commitment to their success. “He’s a mad dude, but I love him,” Millar said of Sutton this week. “I know he would run through a brick wall for me.”https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/may/06/shane-sutton-sergeant-major-commanding-officer-cycling-rio-2016Back in 2002, Sutton was a brilliant acquisition. His nous and drive were just what the emerging generation of British cyclists needed – but only in combination with Brailsford’s visionary management and the ability of Dr Steve Peters to soothe away an athlete’s self-doubt...
In any army, good regimental sergeant majors are worth their weight in gold, and for a dozen years Sutton was worth his weight in gold medals. But the qualities of a good RSM are not those of a commanding officer, who needs a gift for diplomacy and strategic thinking. The CO will ensure that the RSM’s methods of discipline and motivation are kept within the proper bounds. Those who elevated Sutton to a position that exposed his weaknesses must take responsibility for the events of the past fortnight, and for the possible consequences in Rio. So must Brailsford, whose unwillingness to create a women’s squad at Team Sky lies behind much of the support for Varnish’s act of revenge.
Robert21 said:http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cycling/shane-sutton-and-i-two-words-he-always-brought-to-mind-were-nervous-energy-a7004286.htmlIn a world of high-budget sport where pr spin and ‘controlling the narrative’ have now become objectives sometimes as important as the results themselves, Shane Sutton - sometimes for better, sometimes, as has become dramatically obvious this week, for worse - has always been one to speak his mind.
“He is a no-nonsense, fantastic motivator, but he calls a spade a spade, too,” one former British professional rider who raced with Sutton in the 1980s and who knows him well, tells The Independent. “His ability to read a race is brilliant, particularly in terms of track cycling. I don’t think there’s a better person for track craft out there.”
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/boardman-british-cyclings-trial-by-press-has-been-disappointing/I was involved with Shane and everyone knew that he was a straight talker, no nonsense and that he could read a rider," he told Cyclingnews.
“I’ve been disappointed to see trial by press over the last week, which whatever you think of an individual, I don’t think that’s fair but now you have an inquiry underway so I’d say let it do its job and lets see what happens.
Looking around the forums it seems that the paralympians use much the same terminology, and worse, to describe themselves. That said, I do know that one of the rules of politically-correct goodthinkfulness is that "Only a bunny can call another bunny 'cute'."Benotti69 said:He also calls paralympians 'gimps' and 'wobblies'.....wonder what he calls the Aborigine Australians.....![]()
Anyhow, perhaps it's a good job that the mob have 'sexists' to get all worked up about these days. At least 'sexists' only have their careers destroyed, rather than being burnt, although I think some would still like to put Sutton to the torch if they could get away with it!I'm afraid that the rule now is to forget everything he's done because he said some nasty words that offended a few easily offended people with a grudge.
Robert21 said:Looking around the forums it seems that the paralympians use much the same terminology, and worse, to describe themselves. That said, I do know that one of the rules of politically-correct goodthinkfulness is that "Only a bunny can call another bunny 'cute'."Benotti69 said:He also calls paralympians 'gimps' and 'wobblies'.....wonder what he calls the Aborigine Australians.....![]()
![]()
Personally, I think that a poster over on the UK Time Trial forum had it right when they said
Anyhow, perhaps it's a good job that the mob have 'sexists' to get all worked up about these days. At least 'sexists' only have their careers destroyed, rather than being burnt, although I think some would still like to put Sutton to the torch if they could get away with it!I'm afraid that the rule now is to forget everything he's done because he said some nasty words that offended a few easily offended people with a grudge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3jt5ibfRzw
Robert21 said:Looking around the forums it seems that the paralympians use much the same terminology, and worse, to describe themselves. That said, I do know that one of the rules of politically-correct goodthinkfulness is that "Only a bunny can call another bunny 'cute'."Benotti69 said:He also calls paralympians 'gimps' and 'wobblies'.....wonder what he calls the Aborigine Australians.....![]()
![]()
Personally, I think that a poster over on the UK Time Trial forum had it right when they said
Anyhow, perhaps it's a good job that the mob have 'sexists' to get all worked up about these days. At least 'sexists' only have their careers destroyed, rather than being burnt, although I think some would still like to put Sutton to the torch if they could get away with it!I'm afraid that the rule now is to forget everything he's done because he said some nasty words that offended a few easily offended people with a grudge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3jt5ibfRzw
The Hitch said:Robert21 said:Looking around the forums it seems that the paralympians use much the same terminology, and worse, to describe themselves. That said, I do know that one of the rules of politically-correct goodthinkfulness is that "Only a bunny can call another bunny 'cute'."Benotti69 said:He also calls paralympians 'gimps' and 'wobblies'.....wonder what he calls the Aborigine Australians.....![]()
![]()
Personally, I think that a poster over on the UK Time Trial forum had it right when they said
Anyhow, perhaps it's a good job that the mob have 'sexists' to get all worked up about these days. At least 'sexists' only have their careers destroyed, rather than being burnt, although I think some would still like to put Sutton to the torch if they could get away with it!I'm afraid that the rule now is to forget everything he's done because he said some nasty words that offended a few easily offended people with a grudge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3jt5ibfRzw
I could buy a PC argument.
If Sutton made it himself.
But he didn't. He claims it's not true.
So. Either he is lying, or half a dozen other people, some of who'm don't know eachother, are all lying, and for no apparent reason.
So even if we buy your argument that it is kosher to call disabled people gimps, Sutton still deserves everything he has coming to him, for slandering honest people and being a public liar himself.
