Cookster15
Moderator
42x16ss said:There are always some triathletes who are superb bike riders, however they are very much in the minority. So many of them come from running and swimming backgrounds NOT cycling (esp in AUS - where it seems a surf lifesaving background is popular) so they are learning the bike at a later age and don't give it the same focus as the swim and run.
As the bike leg often has a drafting component (legal or not) the swim and run are the money legs. So while triathletes are often FAST bike riders, they aren't necessarily GOOD bike riders. They often lack handling skills, are unconfident in bunches and can be overly reliant on aerobars.
The best way I can think of improving the average skill of triathletes is to make the bike the final leg, not the transition leg.
Thanks for the sensible reply - I agree with most of this except for the possible solution. In a Tri the run leg is placed last as when you bonk running you usually won't hurt yourself or anyone else (you walk). When you bonk swimming you can drown and when you bonk on the bike your chances of crashing rapidly rise. The longer into a Triathlon (or bike race), the closer you are to bonking.
Insurance is usually one of the highest costs of organising both Triathlons or Bike races. I suggest the order of Tri legs is linked to reducing the risk of harm to the competitors which in turn should reduce the insurance premium and therefore entry and license fees.
What is my solution? I don't have one except to treat Triathletes as another racing challenge. Through tolerating their apparent idioacy you allow them to acquire the required handling skills quicker ... result, everyone's happy.
