Hi. New here so apologies for long post. Just jumping in to the general thread title train of thought.
I've been thinking about all the talk of 'when are they going to get popped etc'...and stepping back from it all a wee bit...
Do I
really believe Sky (as a team-ignoring the ever present possibility of individuals taking risks) would be stupid enough to be doing illegal stuff in this day and age? No I don't because you would never be able to 100% guarantee that sh!t wouldn't hit the fan at some point, and Brailsford et al do not strike me as the sort of guys that would take that risk. Look back to the success of the GB track squad, the marginal gains thing is laughed at now, but it could be said that they kinda pioneered the idea of looking at the details and leaving nothing to chance. Which seemed to work (assuming that was all clean). Whilst the testing is clearly by no means perfect, people are still being caught and ergo, doping must still be considered a risk. And not the relative free for all it was back before the EPO test.
And yeah, the whole marginal gains thing has been poo-poo'd a lot (and with reason in some cases ie apparent bizarre lack of wind tunnel testing), but has anyone considered that it might extend to seeking out
legal forms of performance enhancement that other teams for whatever reason are not using? With a budget as large as Sky's is it beyond imagination to consider using the services of pharma companies for bespoke legal enhancement? Or big budget going towards research etc? We don't know what they do with all that extra money the other teams don't have...has to go somewhere.
All the posturing and PR stuff, again, these guys are not stupid. If they're sticking their necks out and saying things like 'a yellow jersey that will stand the test of time' it must be because they are 99.9999% sure that
as things stand today and in terms of what they are doing today, they're safe. I'd say that's just basic business sense. Would the sponsor like it if you make BIG noise about how clean you are then get rumbled? Doubt it. Would make them look stupid. And this is after all, one big business.
I would not be at all surprised if samples are tested in the future (in light of new banned lists/tests etc) and come back positive...but for stuff that is not currently illegal. Then they'd be in the sh!t perhaps from some angles in an ethical sense (unfair advantages etc), but would always be able to go 'well what we said was true-it was completely above board'. And at the end of the day, does it not have to come down to what you define as 'clean'? Someone who doesn't add anything else to their body outside basic food, eg: protein shakes and upwards? And is someone that uses legal supplements such as Caffeine, Beta Alanine, Sodium Bicarbonate, dare I say it...Salbutamol (within the boundaries) clean? They have to be. If they do not use banned products then what else can you call them if not clean? I consider myself a clean rider-but I use legal supplements to enhance my performance! Just like I use legal advantages such as a disc wheel for time trialling.
Nutshell: sneaky stuff. But above board. Morally questionable perhaps. Can't wait to find out what it is