- Sep 10, 2009
- 5,663
- 0
- 0
So you think USPS riders wouldn't have doped if not for Armstrong's bullying? So Bruyneel had no role (or Riis, or Saiz, etc)? And was Armstrong responsible for the team doping at Festina, Kelme, Telekom, ONCE, etc?TheEnoculator said:Armstrong ain't no ordinary doper. He also coerced others to dope, trafficked drugs, threatened others about coming forward, bullied his teammates into doping or they'd be kicked off the team, getting his ex-wife involved in storing and preparing the drugs. He even administered the drugs to one of his teammates.
The guy is a drug dealer, and the ringleader of a huge doping program. He turned cycling into drug cartel, literally.
At least the other dopers just doped and lied and denied. Armstrong is way worse than all of them combined, so he deserves way worse than what happened to others. That's why he got a life-time ban.
So no, I don't think I'm overboard.
Don't misunderstand, I think Armstrong is getting all that he deserves, but he didn't single-handedly destroy cycling nor was doping in cycling a result of Armstrong. It would've happened with or without him. Some - like Armstrong - were worse than others, definitely, but all are complicit.