• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

State of the Peloton 2024

Page 31 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Here's the answer:

The good Dr. Walter Schmidt's research ... he's been building up his protocols for CO dosing since 2013. He's been studying Hypoxia's effects on the body since 1990's. WADA saw it and ...

There's a reason they're always "at altitude" ... it's not just standard live high train low stuff ... they're artificially inducing extreme altitude adaptations in the human body with CO (and possibly other things as well). Effing dangerous if kids start doing that. Totally irresponsible but I think the cat's out of the bag.
And this is prohibited or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93 and noob
If it works by EPO gene expression then it should simply show up in blood values and hematocrit. How are you gonna beat 60%?
Best guess? $$. But I'm sure there's loopholes as well ... if they're at altitude all the time, and the hematocrit levels gradually increase every time, and it's a stair-step effect where when they come down from altitude they never drop all the way back to normal, and then the next round of "altitude" jumps them just a bit past their previous max ... it could seem explicable to the testing bodies.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: noob
If it works by EPO gene expression then it should simply show up in blood values and hematocrit. How are you gonna beat 60%?
I don’t know about 60%. But to the rest, “Altitude Camps” plus the governing bodies stopped caring some time ago. Show must go on. Plausible deniability and all that.

I dunno. That’s where my head is at. It’s not a deep thought. Could certainly be wrong.

What is certain is that those in the sport aren’t comforting themselves with better training and smoother roads. All that stuff absolutely must make a difference. But they can’t think it’s clean, so they either don’t care, don’t have a way to stop it, or both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob
I don’t know about 60%. But to the rest, “Altitude Camps” plus the governing bodies stopped caring some time ago. Show must go on. Plausible deniability and all that.

I dunno. That’s where my head is at. It’s not a deep thought. Could certainly be wrong.

What is certain is that those in the sport aren’t comforting themselves with better training and smoother roads. All that stuff absolutely must make a difference. But they can’t think it’s clean, so they either don’t care, don’t have a way to stop it, or both.
If CO is so low cost and so effective, annyone should be going full *** on that stuff and gaps between riders shouldn't be so isnane
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93 and noob
Here's the answer:

The good Dr. Walter Schmidt's research ... he's been building up his protocols for CO dosing since 2013. He's been studying Hypoxia's effects on the body since 1990's. WADA saw it and ...

There's a reason they're always "at altitude" ... it's not just standard live high train low stuff ... they're artificially inducing extreme altitude adaptations in the human body with CO (and possibly other things as well). Effing dangerous if kids start doing that. Totally irresponsible but I think the cat's out of the bag.

They are literally using the same thing (CO) that was used to exterminate millions during WW2?

I think I'd rather have the motors...
 
  • Wow
Reactions: noob
If CO is so low cost and so effective, annyone should be going full *** on that stuff and gaps between riders shouldn't be so isnane
It's also effing dangerous as hell ... there's a reason someone developed special equipment to test for CO adaptation. The better control and the better the protocol the more effective it's going to be. That's why expensive equipment is being used, that's why the richest teams with the best doctors are winning.
 
If CO is so low cost and so effective, annyone should be going full *** on that stuff and gaps between riders shouldn't be so isnane
Are these gaps so different than what we’ve seen historically? Aren’t MANY riders beating these previous records? Isn’t every stage raced at shocking speeds? At some point some guys are just better. Seems to me what we’re seeing maps quite well to widespread use of…something.

Most plausible explanation I’ve heard yet.

If it’s accessible to all the teams, and these guys aren’t truly harming themselves, I actually don’t have a huge issue with it.
 
Are these gaps so different than what we’ve seen historically? Aren’t MANY riders beating these previous records? Isn’t every stage raced at shocking speeds? At some point some guys are just better. Seems to me what we’re seeing maps quite well to widespread use of…something.

Most plausible explanation I’ve heard yet.

If it’s accessible to all the teams, and these guys aren’t truly harming themselves, I actually don’t have a huge issue with it.
I think once this starts making its way into amateur ranks it becomes very very dangerous. I think it should be banned.
 
Are these gaps so different than what we’ve seen historically? Aren’t MANY riders beating these previous records? Isn’t every stage raced at shocking speeds? At some point some guys are just better. Seems to me what we’re seeing maps quite well to widespread use of…something.

Most plausible explanation I’ve heard yet.

If it’s accessible to all the teams, and these guys aren’t truly harming themselves, I actually don’t have a huge issue with it.

Professionalisation should mean gaps between riders would be shrinking, surely? If everything we hear about nutrition & equipment was true, then there should be a real battle at the top of the sport because it would equalize levels, i.e. whereas in the past the gaps in the Merckx era (for example) really were huge because pro dopers were riding against a bunch of semi pros... who were probably also doping but not as efficiently. Rinse repeat 1980's, 1990's & 2000's.

We basically haven't seen gaps like these & performance differences of this sort since 2009, IMO. That's when Contador walked the Tour in Bruyneel's team before he lost a level or two for reasons we know.

The real killer (to use a Sean Kelly-ism) & total unmasking of the man behind the curtain is today on Stage 15 there's nowhere for the people who believe in miracles to hide. It was a hard multi col Pyrenean slog (this has often been used to handwave mutant performances in modern cycling by claiming unipuerto stages favor record breaking), it was raced super hard from the beginning with Visma on the front (again, stages raced at a slower speed behind a breakaway have been used to minimize ascent speeds by claiming the riders were fresh) & this stage came the day after another Pyrenean stage at the end of week 2 just before rest day.

Aka on paper, the stage was set for for fatigue to slow the riders. They should be tired.

I'll speculate here but in old currency (aka dope terminology from 20 years ago) what happened was a blood bag bonanza. In that scenario Vinge did his last night in order to save his TdF after yesterday's defeat, hence why Visma drilled it today. I can only imagine what Pog has done to be at this level. The mind boggles.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: noob
Are these gaps so different than what we’ve seen historically? Aren’t MANY riders beating these previous records? Isn’t every stage raced at shocking speeds? At some point some guys are just better. Seems to me what we’re seeing maps quite well to widespread use of…something.

Most plausible explanation I’ve heard yet.

If it’s accessible to all the teams, and these guys aren’t truly harming themselves, I actually don’t have a huge issue with it.
3 riders broke the old record today. One of them by 4 minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93 and noob