The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
davidg said:I have always bought Zipp built wheels. None of them ever arrived with spokes pulled through!
trek52 said:I can get a second hand set of these ;Reynolds Stratus DV 46 UL Tubular what are your thoughts ?
RDV4ROUBAIX said:Good choice. Make sure they're in decent condition, closely inspect the braking surface for abnormal or too much ware. Check the bonding at junction points around the rims to make sure it isn't delaminating anywhere. Spokes, nipples, spoke tension, trueness, hubs, bearings, etc. Maybe have a shop inspect them if you're not sure.
L29205 said:+1
For the money spent if you don't have a good truing stand and a good spoke tension gauge a qualified shop inspection is recommended. Cannot do that with Ebay and related but an auction is always a risk.
Most of the posts have focused on your requests for a light Aero wheel. I would ask the other posters a question. For the requester's weight and requirements of Crit racing and sprinting ability. Is the request the best for the rider? Would not a well build stiff rear wheel with little concern to aero concerns work best? Most crit's are pack races were drafting negates the aero effects of the wheel quite a bit. Rotating mass is a concern for sprinting out of the corners. Pack racing also means you don't get to choose the best line in the race. Therefore a obstacle on the pavement that you would normally be able to avoid is not avoidable. So should the rider in question be looking for the best, low mass, high stiffness wheel, with a proven durability and without a concern for aero?
Thoughts?
trek52 said:Interesting question, I look forward to the answers. My thoughts on an aero wheel is that I thought the deep dish wheels spun up quicker and help maintain speed ? I could be incorrect however. Would it be better to have a different rear to front ? Last night i got in a breakaway and thought the deep wheels would have been great and with an aero wheel are the spoken not shorter = stiffer.
I am on a lot of forums outside of cycling but this place is fantastic !!
trek52 said:Interesting question, I look forward to the answers. My thoughts on an aero wheel is that I thought the deep dish wheels spun up quicker and help maintain speed ? I could be incorrect however. Would it be better to have a different rear to front ? Last night i got in a breakaway and thought the deep wheels would have been great and with an aero wheel are the spoken not shorter = stiffer.
I am on a lot of forums outside of cycling but this place is fantastic !!
RDV4ROUBAIX said:The great thing about deep carbon wheels is they offer this great placebo effect to make you think that you're faster, when in fact it's all you, not your equipment. The real world advantages are barely braking the 1% value, despite what the mfg's claims are. Someone with more fitness is still going to out preform you in a race even if they were on a steel frame from 1992 with low pro wheels, and you're not going to catch them by doing upgrades.
The biggest noticeable difference I feel with deep carbon wheels is stiffness, even more so than the aero aspect. Aero means nothing unless you're at the front all day in a small break, or pulling the train at a solid 48kph. All the advancements in wheel tech are designed for pros who are looking for every advantage they can get. These finite advantages, IMHO, mean less at club level or amateur racing. No denying that deep carbon will make you look more racy though.![]()
rgmerk said:and spending on aero seems to me one of the less illogical ways to lighten one's wallet on bike bling.