The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
of course i ride a bike...what does that have to do with anything? i also run, lift weights, i have been watching races for many many years and i am well aware of history, and also how cycling is changing. I dont need any lessons from you on anything related to cycling. lol...read up...yah..ok.And would you stop playing thought police in telling folks how they should analyse cycling. Clearly you have no clue about historical Tour journalism and its"convicts of the road" in French, Italian, Spanish and Dutch, for which the Grand Bouclé has always been presented as an epic fight for survival in the style of Greek tragedy and epic poetry. The very fame and legend of the Tour itself was built on such journalism, which captures the heroic nature of the event for the lay public. With good reason, because the dramatic suffering, triumphs and failures of its riders has always involved blood, sweat and tears and, unfortunately, even death occasionally. So other than "normalizing" the forum, perhaps you should read up on things first before attempting to give unsolicited lessons. Regarding "forum hardmen," do you even ride a bike?
haha..is it obvious? i watch lots of sports...wrong again. all or nothing is dramatic...sorry.... define all or nothing? what does "blow up" mean in reality? why don't you also throw the word epic in there..lol ...and yawn..he is in second place....like i said...a measured risk...do you really think anyone with a sponsor is going to do the all or nothing and go for 20th place instead of 2nd. He didn't just accept second place....that is what he went for and is satisfied with. This is all about measured risks, watching bike computer, and making sponsors happy...do or die, all or nothing talk is just drama.You obviously don't watch much sport. It's not dramatic at all. It's quite simple - all or nothing. Risk everything to win the race....If it comes off, it's a great story. If it fails and he blows up, so what? He tried....there's glory in a heroic failure. Far better than just accepting 2nd place.....
You were the one giving lessons and you did so pompously in two separate posts. I just called you out on it. Just for the record, since you've given a litany of all your sporting endeavors, I've raced in the Alpes over legendary passes and there is nothing more epic, dramatic and harrowing in sport. Leave out lessons giving.of course i ride a bike...what does that have to do with anything? i also run, lift weights, i have been watching races for many many years and i am well aware of history, and also how cycling is changing. I dont need any lessons from you on anything related to cycling. lol...read up...yah..ok.
Overanalyzing much here? He wasn't fooled, he didn't spend more energy than Vingegaard on the Galibier, his team turned out to be quite good actually, only Hirschi bad, the rest good, Majka never rode that well as helper his whole career, just that Jumbo is extra-terrestrial. Forget Sky at its best, nowhere close to this.
But in the end reason 1, 2 and 3 are: Vingegaard just was better. If he wasn't, Pogacar would still have won.
I think it's mostly that Vingegaard is a bit better at HC MTFs (at least right now)
Not as much as Pogačar's time losses on the Granon and Hautacam reflect. Of course. He spent more energy in both stages.
I think Vingegaard would have been in yellow regardless, if Pog had a better team.
But the TT would have been decisive. A shame we were (likely) robbed of a meaningful TT battle. Was really looking forward to this one.
I think so many tactical things change if Pogacar doesn't kill himself on the Galibier. Especially considering that Vingegaard was actually hesitant about attacking on Granon. It's actually not an unlikely scenario that Pogacar loses very little time on Granon because Vingegaard may be even more wary to attack.I think it's mostly that Vingegaard is a bit better at HC MTFs (at least right now)
Not as much as Pogačar's time losses on the Granon and Hautacam reflect. Of course. He spent more energy in both stages.
I think Vingegaard would have been in yellow regardless, if Pog had a better team.
But the TT would have been decisive. A shame we were (likely) robbed of a meaningful TT battle. Was really looking forward to this one.
haha..is it obvious? i watch lots of sports...wrong again. all or nothing is dramatic...sorry.... define all or nothing? what does "blow up" mean in reality? why don't you also throw the word epic in there..lol ...and yawn..he is in second place....like i said...a measured risk...do you really think anyone with a sponsor is going to do the all or nothing and go for 20th place instead of 2nd. He didn't just accept second place....that is what he went for and is satisfied with. This is all about measured risks, watching bike computer, and making sponsors happy...do or die, all or nothing talk is just drama.
No, copied from the common sense almanac. Try it, good book.Likely copied from the JV almanac?
AgreedTrue, he was (most likely) fair and squarely beaten, but Jumbo had to throw the kitchen sink at him, and he was down to 2 useful helpers by the last week. If he played the Galibier smarter he's still in yellow right now.
TP needs to take about 3:27 in the TT.
On that stage, physically and mentally, JV worked him over and got inside his head. He wasn't fooled but he did too much e.g. after getting attacked and counter-attacked repeatedly, he put in that big dig to try and drop Roglic and Vingo only to have it instantly covered. He tried to show them that he's still the boss but he should have let Roglic go a bit, recover and ride at his own tempo, only watching Vingo. Up until that stage, Pog had the measure of Vingo.
What didn't help after was the continuing super-strength of Jumbo and the lack of UAE team support.
Why the big time loss? Many possible reasons, didn't eat enough? Altitude? Was ok on the Galibier, but then all his super perfomances so far were on lower altitude, maybe he does a bit less well high up? Spent too much energy? This one can explain the time loss to Quintana and company, not to Vingegaard, since they rode together until then. Conclusion: Vingegaard was just stronger that day. As he was to Hautacam. Pogacar had a small collapse on the Granon, reasons see above, a mix of all possible too.
Vingegaard didn't gain a lot of time. They were even in time trials this Tour so unless Vingegaard drops Pogi in the mountains, Pogi will have the upper hand thanks to his capacity to grab bonus seconds.Thats going to be hard in the future. I think among Pogi fans the hope was that he will at least have the upper hand over skinny Vingegaard in TTs.