Anyone saying Valverde was better than Contador, should be banned for life. Even Valverde knows Contador was a better rider all things considered.
They were both a lot better than the biggest luck merchant of all time, Nibali.Anyone saying Valverde was better than Contador, should be banned for life. Even Valverde knows Contador was a better rider all things considered.
This fits nicely in this thread because it's blatantly false. More mixing frogs with grandmas.They were both a lot better than the biggest luck merchant of all time, Nibali.
Vuelta - luckThis fits nicely in this thread because it's blatantly false. More mixing frogs with grandmas.
He was lucky 7 times. He was unlucky many more times.Vuelta - luck
Giro - luck
Tour - luck
MSR - luck
Lombardia - being a daredevil and getting lucky on the descents
What about the 2013 Giro?Vuelta - luck
Giro - luck
Tour - luck
MSR - luck
Lombardia - being a daredevil and getting lucky on the descents
Yes, Pogačar and Valverde are 1:1 the same.
Oh, it is not fun when anyone does what you do? Cool. Good day, mr topcat.He was lucky 7 times. He was unlucky many more times.
You can have the last word.
Good luck.
I'm saying it! Again!Anyone saying Valverde was better than Contador, should be banned for life. Even Valverde knows Contador was a better rider all things considered.
Nibali was lucky that Wiggins couldn't hack it.What about the 2013 Giro?
I was responding about who the best rider in the world is, and took last year's results as a parameter.Valverde was a generalist rider that did better in rankings than in individual awards while Contador was a stage race specialist that did better in awards than rankings - You think Valverde was better.
Pogačar is a generalist rider that so far is doing better in rankings than in individual awards while Van der Poel is a classics specialist who is doing better in awards than rankings - You think Van der Poel was better last year.
While I wouldn't have minded if Van der Poel had won the Velo d'Or last year because he never won it and did a legendary classics campaign, it seems incoherent to me that you claim Van der Poel was better than Pogačar because from a results standpoint its actually the opposite.
based on whatI know Pogacar has great TTs in July but overall I think Ayuso is better on flatter TTs at this point. Maybe I’m wrong though.
I don't know... Maybe more like Gimondi and Rominger. They both were capable of winning monuments and GT's, but there was always someone stronger.But if you wanne compare riders to Pogacar noone in the peleton will due yet atleast, objectively you have to go with riders like Indurain, Merckx at this point simply from what hes doing across everything already which we havent seen since the likes of Merckx, indurain and the other legends of the sport.
Pogacar is the next Jan ullrich thread.I don't know... Maybe more like Gimondi and Rominger. They both were capable of winning monuments and GT's, but there was always someone stronger.
I know this should rather go into the Vingo-Thread, but I am really curious now:Obv not saying Vingegaard is not gifted ofc he is but not too that level, hes very limited/niche
Ayuso beat Ganna for the win in a short flat TT this year if I’m not mistaken, along with Vingegaard and others. And he is still getting better. I just don’t rate Pogacar that high in flat TTs, I think he is top 10 but could get inched by Ayuso, which was the initial point, a false team hierarchy potentially being established like in the Vuelta.based on what
For me it is his recovery. He wasn't better than Pogacar until stage 16 last year and normally people underestimate Pogacar's w/kg because he isn't 66kg when he is in Tour's shape (@Froome the other day put an article showing Quintana at 59 59 when he was in tour's shape and that is just BS and not true at all. Quintana was something like 55/54 kg when he was runner up in the 2015 Tour). So in terms of w/kg, they are very similar and I think the difference is really the fantastic way Vingegaard can recover.I know this should rather go into the Vingo-Thread, but I am really curious now:
What is the limited niche of Vingo's talent / abilities exactely:
Is it his climbing abilities, on mid/long climbs, with W/kg numbers hardly second to anybody else in history? (not only once but since almost 3 years now)
Or is it his TTs when in peak shape? (his Combloux performance widely regarded as the best since Indurain 1993 in Luxembourg / Ullrich 1997 in Saint-Etienne)
Or is it his recovery abilities and stamina in 3 week GTs, and ability to perform top in any weather conditions?
Not to mentions other things like bike handeling / downhill etc....
The article also had w/kg in a standard weight, it doesn't matter if Vingegaard weighs 58 or 60, or if Pogacar weighs 66 or 68 kg.For me it is his recovery. He wasn't better than Pogacar until stage 16 last year and normally people underestimate Pogacar's w/kg because he isn't 66kg when he is in Tour's shape (@Froome the other put an article showing Quintana at 59 59 when he was in tour's shape and that is just BS and not true at all. Quintana was something like 55/54 kg when he was runner up in the 2015 Tour). So in terms of w/kg, they are very similar and I think the difference is really the fantastic way Vingegaard can recover.
That's your take and you are entitled to it. Last season was legendary for Pogi. If it weren't for the crash I believe it would be even better. You are putting a lot of emphasis on the WC title it seems.I was responding about who the best rider in the world is, and took last year's results as a parameter.
Van Der Poel gets my vote. I gave him the edge over Pogacar, and then Vingegaard.
In 2022. Remco Evenepoel was the best rider, again over Pogacar.
In 2021. it was Pogacar.
I really can't see what Valverde and Contador has to do with that. There were years where Valverde was better, and there were years where it was opposite. Overall I value Valverde a tiny bit higher, but that's strictly my opinion. Just like overall I value Pogacar's career higher than Vingegaard's or Van Der Poel's. But as I said, last time he was clearly the best rider in the world, was 2021. Last two season's there was someone better than him imo.
That's all.
I was responding about who the best rider in the world is, and took last year's results as a parameter.
Van Der Poel gets my vote. I gave him the edge over Pogacar, and then Vingegaard.
In 2022. Remco Evenepoel was the best rider, again over Pogacar.
In 2021. it was Pogacar.
I really can't see what Valverde and Contador has to do with that. There were years where Valverde was better, and there were years where it was opposite. Overall I value Valverde a tiny bit higher, but that's strictly my opinion. Just like overall I value Pogacar's career higher than Vingegaard's or Van Der Poel's. But as I said, last time he was clearly the best rider in the world, was 2021. Last two season's there was someone better than him imo.
That's all.
there is no way that will happen; Ayuso is not even close to Pog right nowAyuso beat Ganna for the win in a short flat TT this year if I’m not mistaken, along with Vingegaard and others. And he is still getting better. I just don’t rate Pogacar that high in flat TTs, I think he is top 10 but could get inched by Ayuso, which was the initial point, a false team hierarchy potentially being established like in the Vuelta.
I agree about the overall scenario but moreso playing devil’s advocate.. UAE is a team that will have several riders in the mix and could easily have a Kuss-like scenariothere is no way that will happen; Ayuso is not even close to Pog right now