He climbed at Jorgenson's level, which means he was far below his level.Pogacar says he rode the first section too conservatively. But in this case he should've demolished the climb and the last section.
That explanation is almost more worrying .
He climbed at Jorgenson's level, which means he was far below his level.Pogacar says he rode the first section too conservatively. But in this case he should've demolished the climb and the last section.
The level is relative. Last year Pog was in an annus mirabilis, but you can't expect that always, which would also be boring. He'll be good in the Tour. Jorgenson is just super right now, as his talent merits.He climbed at Jorgenson's level, which means he was far below his level.
That explanation is almost more worrying .
It's one thing not to be at the same level as last year, and another to be at the level of Jorgenson and Lipowitz.The level is relative. Last year Pog was in an annus mirabilis, but you can't expect that always, which would also be boring. He'll be good in the Tour. Jorgenson is just super right now, as his talent merits.
Yes, it wasn't a great TT for Pogi. I think everyone agrees on this so I'm not sure what you're trying to say.It's one thing not to be at the same level as last year, and another to be at the level of Jorgenson and Lipowitz.
Pogacar should´ve finished third, at least, and far superior to fourth. Not having done so is a bad performance.
You keep harping on Jorgenson and Lipowitz. Are they not extremely talented professionals? Do they not have the right to crush it on the day? Calm down, Pog was good, but not great. Yet the Tour is another beast. The mountains anyway, as Vingo said, given that we have junior length TTs nowadays, shall be decisive. So there is yet hope.It's one thing not to be at the same level as last year, and another to be at the level of Jorgenson and Lipowitz.
Pogacar should´ve finished third, at least, and far superior to fourth. Not having done so is a bad performance.
of course it's a very bad performance for him, we will see in the next days if it's a TT issue or a form issueIt's one thing not to be at the same level as last year, and another to be at the level of Jorgenson and Lipowitz.
Pogacar should´ve finished third, at least, and far superior to fourth. Not having done so is a bad performance.
ofc they are talented professionals, but there are levels to these, if pog is on their level on the day it means his performance was badYou keep harping on Jorgenson and Lipowitz. Are they not extremely talented professionals? Do they not have the right to crush it on the day? Calm down, Pog was good, but not great. Yet the Tour is another beast. The mountains anyway, as Vingo said, given that we have junior length TTs nowadays, shall be decisive. So there is yet hope.
Pogacar's climb was worse than Lenny's.Bad performance but very curious about the difference in the sections as it appears the climb was good.
Presume the ITT on Peyragudes will be done full on road bikes which is just as well.
Friday will tell a bit on the overall form and if the altitude adjustment has improved but there will be nowhere for anyone to hide on Saturdays stage.
Believing Hikaru is GOAT puts your Roglic preference into a different perspective😁Welcome to the Dauphine, where real top riders have their worst race of the season, because the Tour is next month, and to quote the greatest chess player of all time
"Chat, I literally don't care".
Did everyone seriously forget the Slovenian nationals ITT in 2021?
Pogacar's climb was worse than Lenny's.
For me, that's a bad climb for Pogacar.
When was the last time four riders climbed better than Pogacar? Col de la Loze, which was catastrophic for him.
watts2win.eu
If the times are real, JV is in trouble too because MJ was faster than him up the climb!Of course I insist on Lipowitz and Jorgenson.
Pogacar, not being at his 2024 level, could finish third by losing time.
Losing to Jorgenson and being tied with Lipowitz is a very bad result for him.
That's not not being at the level of 2024, that's being bad.
While appreciating Jorgenson and Lipowitz, we also can't dismiss Pogacar and say it's no surprise he's at Lipowitz's level. That's dismissive, dismissive with Pogacar.
By the way, Van der Poel being only 22 seconds behind Pogacar in a time trial with a climb is also a bad symptom for Pogacar. And this isn't to disparage Van der Poel.
When so many riders inferior to him are so close, it means Pogacar has done poorly, not just that the others have done well.
When a rider of that level does poorly, it's noticeable when inferior riders are above or equal to him.
If Remco and Vingegaard had simply beaten him, the conclusion might be different. But when Pogacar wasn't even superior to inferior riders, the conclusion is that Pogacar was indeed doing poorly.
Honestly not sure why everyone is surprised that he had a “bad” TT he kind of routinely has bad TT’s. He’s even said they mess with him mentally because he’s won and lost things on a TT stage. Better to have one before the tour than at the tour.
I do think the bike is looking a bit unstable but he’s never going to publicly say anything.
Majka is back training. Looks like he will probably replace someone on the tour squad.
I think the team will get a change up. Not sure who. Could be Narváez but that’s just on what I’ve seen speculated
Adam Yates?
