• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 164 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I would expect a 26,8 km TT to go faster than a 184 km stage with a double ascent.
The two fastest times on the Mont Ventoux came from the TT in theDauphiné 2004. None of the TdF climbs ever came close, not in even the EPO years of 1994 and 1999.
That tells you how 'special' Pogacars performance was today.


26 km TT just means you‘re already pushing for a few kilometers before the climb and they also had to do another kilometer to the very top of Grappa
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Rick
Pantani's 95 and 97 times up AdH are also faster than Armstrong's TT in 04

90s times were much faster than anything before and after, Pantani or no Pantani. Mt Ventoux TTs clearly suggest that for such long climbs a standalone performance is better due to even pacing: just look how for first few km Pelizzarri advantage didn't change much due to slower UAE pace-makers. Alpe ITT was also great: Armstrong beat his own spectacular 2001 climbing, so did Ullrich vs 2001. There's no doubt in my mind that Pogacar could have ridden even faster in a standalone TT.
 
90s times were much faster than anything before and after, Pantani or no Pantani. Mt Ventoux TTs clearly suggest that for such long climbs a standalone performance is better due to even pacing: just look how for first few km Pelizzarri advantage didn't change much due to slower UAE pace-makers. Alpe ITT was also great: Armstrong beat his own spectacular 2001 climbing, so did Ullrich vs 2001. There's no doubt in my mind that Pogacar could have ridden even faster in a standalone TT.
Ullrich's 2001 climb was unimpressive anyway, he barely gapped Beloki and Christophe Moreau.
 
90s times were much faster than anything before and after, Pantani or no Pantani. Mt Ventoux TTs clearly suggest that for such long climbs a standalone performance is better due to even pacing: just look how for first few km Pelizzarri advantage didn't change much due to slower UAE pace-makers. Alpe ITT was also great: Armstrong beat his own spectacular 2001 climbing, so did Ullrich vs 2001. There's no doubt in my mind that Pogacar could have ridden even faster in a standalone TT.
What also happens is you get a false idea of pacing cause if everybody follows the group at first when they try to set up Pogacar initially nobody will drop when a Grosschartner is doing like 5.9-6W/kg

Pogacar is meanwhile saving >0.1W/kg very consistently on the 60% of the climb before he attacks.
 
To me the problem with Ventoux is it's an extremely wind dependent climb to make a strong comparison between MTT versus road stage.

I think the 1st ascent is a much bigger factor, and I also think that the difference for a guy who is below threshold the entire first ascent is likely gonna be under a minute.
 
It was an alien performance FFS. End of a GT, one of the fastest if not the fastest ever Giro, double ascent, only launched it part way up, and absolutely torched everyone.

There are going to be a lot of "yeah, buts", it for anybody who does the math, it adds up to ultra dodgy poop filled diaper performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QueenStagiaire
It was an alien performance FFS. End of a GT, one of the fastest if not the fastest ever Giro, double ascent, only launched it part way up, and absolutely torched everyone.

There are going to be a lot of "yeah, buts", it for anybody who does the math, it adds up to ultra dodgy poop filled diaper performance.
I'm sorry sir, we're not questioning if it's an ultra dodgy poop filled diaper performance, we're trying to gauge if it's more ultradodgypoopy than all the other ones

Finally, I don't even think performances like this bother me terribly much. The circle jerk of fanboys over any particular doper is, however, perplexing.
The worst is when they get a Nathan van Hooydonck on commentary and get him to tell you how cleanz Pogacar is.