Pantani's 95 and 97 times up AdH are also faster than Armstrong's TT in 04
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
26 km TT just means you‘re already pushing for a few kilometers before the climb and they also had to do another kilometer to the very top of GrappaI would expect a 26,8 km TT to go faster than a 184 km stage with a double ascent.
The two fastest times on the Mont Ventoux came from the TT in theDauphiné 2004. None of the TdF climbs ever came close, not in even the EPO years of 1994 and 1999.
That tells you how 'special' Pogacars performance was today.
Speed & Glory on Mont Ventoux: TOP 50 fastest rides on the Giant of Provence
© Cyclingnews/John Pierce 1. 2004: 55:51 Iban Mayo 23.10 km/h 2. 2004: 56:26 Tyler Hamilton 22.86 km/h 3. 1999: 56:50 Jonathan V...www.climbing-records.com
Pantani's 95 and 97 times up AdH are also faster than Armstrong's TT in 04
Ullrich's 2001 climb was unimpressive anyway, he barely gapped Beloki and Christophe Moreau.90s times were much faster than anything before and after, Pantani or no Pantani. Mt Ventoux TTs clearly suggest that for such long climbs a standalone performance is better due to even pacing: just look how for first few km Pelizzarri advantage didn't change much due to slower UAE pace-makers. Alpe ITT was also great: Armstrong beat his own spectacular 2001 climbing, so did Ullrich vs 2001. There's no doubt in my mind that Pogacar could have ridden even faster in a standalone TT.
Ullrich's 2001 climb was unimpressive anyway, he barely gapped Beloki and Christophe Moreau.
What also happens is you get a false idea of pacing cause if everybody follows the group at first when they try to set up Pogacar initially nobody will drop when a Grosschartner is doing like 5.9-6W/kg90s times were much faster than anything before and after, Pantani or no Pantani. Mt Ventoux TTs clearly suggest that for such long climbs a standalone performance is better due to even pacing: just look how for first few km Pelizzarri advantage didn't change much due to slower UAE pace-makers. Alpe ITT was also great: Armstrong beat his own spectacular 2001 climbing, so did Ullrich vs 2001. There's no doubt in my mind that Pogacar could have ridden even faster in a standalone TT.
I've lost track of what point either of us is making, but in 2003, Mayo was the only one who wasn't bad that day.Kloden's time in ITT 2004 (was third with a large gap to Armstrong and Ullrich) was almost as good as Mayo's climb the year before though.
Finally, I don't even think performances like this bother me terribly much. The circle jerk of fanboys over any particular doper is, however, perplexing.
Are you really comparing pre-EPO era with peak EPO era?Ventoux was a MTT in 1987. In a normal stage in 1994, Pantani was nearly 4 minutes faster.
Fast era beats slow era, MTT or not.
I tuned in after watching some live mountain biking and had a few minutes!3 straight comments about the performance tells me that it does, in fact, bother you terribly.
I'm sorry sir, we're not questioning if it's an ultra dodgy poop filled diaper performance, we're trying to gauge if it's more ultradodgypoopy than all the other onesIt was an alien performance FFS. End of a GT, one of the fastest if not the fastest ever Giro, double ascent, only launched it part way up, and absolutely torched everyone.
There are going to be a lot of "yeah, buts", it for anybody who does the math, it adds up to ultra dodgy poop filled diaper performance.
The worst is when they get a Nathan van Hooydonck on commentary and get him to tell you how cleanz Pogacar is.Finally, I don't even think performances like this bother me terribly much. The circle jerk of fanboys over any particular doper is, however, perplexing.
That's funny! Nathan was providing some color commentary?I'm sorry sir, we're not questioning if it's an ultra dodgy poop filled diaper performance, we're trying to gauge if it's more ultradodgypoopy than all the other ones
The worst is when they get a Nathan van Hooydonck on commentary and get him to tell you how cleanz Pogacar is.
Yeah he was on Dutch/Flemish Eurosport first then he moved to UK EurosportThat's funny! Nathan was providing some color commentary?
Did he talk about JJ?Yeah he was on Dutch/Flemish Eurosport first then he moved to UK Eurosport
About who?Did he talk about JJ?
Didn't you said today that Emirates team on this race was really good?Double ascent and his team doesn't have enough climbers to put a insane pace for 30 minutes.
JJ = Jonas.About who?
I didn't catch most of his appearance tbh. And I shut it off when the whole Pogi cleanz bs started
That's the point.Are you really comparing pre-EPO era with peak EPO era?
When Alpecin and other teams raced like crazy ever stage the first 1-2 hours.....one of the fastest if not the fastest ever Giro
Or 1964That's the point.
Like comparing 2014 times and 2024 times.