My point was the fact, the competition is really low, resulting in big gaps, is making it seem the perfomances of Pogacar more outrageous than what they are in reality.
The perfomances of Pogacar were really good, but is on par with the perfomances he did in the last years. There's wasn't a improvement by him, and he did a lot of better perfomances in the past than what he did in this Giro.
Talking about the example of the stage Tourmalet 2023, Vingegaard did 6.13 w/kg on Tourmalet, and before he did 5.84 w/kg durin 44 min on Aubisque( almost beating the record) 5.8 w/kg during 31 min on Spandelles, and 6.1 w/kg during 51 min on Tourmalet(where altitude plays a role, not on Grappa). The favourites also spent 15.43 kj/kg/h 3 hours before the beggining of Tourmalet. Hight intensity.
Now today, Pogacar did 6.19 w/kg during 51 minutes, they spent 14 kj/kg/h during 3 hours and half before the beggining of the second ascent Monte grappa. The first ascent of Monte Grappa Pogacar was almost 6 minutes slow than in the first ascent. The fatigue wasn't high.
Now, compare the two stages and tell me what was more impressive. What happened on Tourmalet was less impressive visually, because the GT riders were better than these weak GT riders in the Giro, so Pogacar looked more impressive due to the gaps. Even so, if we look at the data, things are different, even with Vingegaard and other GT riders in the vuelta, not at peak shape like in the Tour.