The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Right?BTW, it is interesting to watch how immediately Taddy drops folks when he lays it down. When it is 100%, I cannot even compare it to races I have been in. More like when someone sprints from a group going at a moderate pace
The bright side of the forum haha the Real forum starts here hahaThis is awesome is this the dark side of the forum? Have I stumbled upon the dark knowledge here? Teach me the way I wanne rip my soul to 9 pieces and live forever.
About 100 LoLsThis is awesome is this the dark side of the forum? Have I stumbled upon the dark knowledge here? Teach me the way I wanne rip my soul to 9 pieces and live forever.
LOL
Even Landis or Horner were never this obvious
So according to your post - Pogacar is neither a classics specialist, nor a climbing specialist, nor a time trial specialist.Why would that be trolling? Pogacar humiliated the classics specialists in Liege, won the most superior Giro win since Basso 2006, and even with that in his legs he comes to the Tour and beats the lighter climbing specialists on Galibier and beats the time trial specialists in a time trial.
I have watched cycling since 2002 and I have never seen anyone this obvious.
An all-rounder, clearly not specializedSo according to your post - Pogacar is neither a classics specialist, nor a climbing specialist, nor a time trial specialist.
What can this loser even do then?
Ok, and what would be the argument that an allrounder shouldn't beat a classics guy, climber, or time trialist to not make it absurd?An all-rounder, clearly not specialized
I've been watching cycling long before 2002 and I've never seen anything like this. Nope, not even close to this kind of alien like performance. All the best cyclist of their eras had some kind of flaw, some type of terrain that didn't suit them, except Pogačar.I have watched cycling since 2002 and I have never seen anyone this obvious.
So you mean posters like Heston are trolling?LOL
Even Landis or Horner were never this obvious
Pretty weird stuff going onI've been watching cycling long before 2002 and I've never seen anything like this. Nope, not even close to this kind of alien like performance. All the best cyclist of their eras had some kind of flaw, some type of terrain that didn't suit them, except Pogačar.
He is an everything specialist, even better than an all-rounder. He is an awesome at everything all around kind of racerSo according to your post - Pogacar is neither a classics specialist, nor a climbing specialist, nor a time trial specialist.
What can this loser even do then?
Listening to Hincapie, Wiggins and Lance roasting Pog tactics and I must admit I tend to agree. Sad.
They talk about Pog needing to be controlled by his DS. How he won't make teammates happy racing this way bc it also kills him.
They are based on the assumption that Pogacar doesn't need to attack because he has a gap of 1 min and 10 s, but obviously Emirates and Pogacar knows they need to take advantage of the opportunities, like gravel stage and this stage 11 to increase the gap to Vingegaard, plus the fact Vingegaard came from injury, so they smelled blood.Listening to Hincapie, Wiggins and Lance roasting Pog tactics and I must admit I tend to agree. Sad.
They talk about Pog needing to be controlled by his DS. How he won't make teammates happy racing this way bc it also kills him.