By the way, in terms of the Pogi versus Vingegaard discussion, I don't think their overall levels are remotely comparable. One is a highly specialized GC guy, cut from the same cloth as the GC winners of the past many, many years. He climbs supremely well, and his time trial is for the most part very good, with last year's Combloux-time trial as a notable exception where he wasn't just very good but out of this world good. That's mostly Nibali, Contador, Froome territory, it's not something that we haven't seen before.
Pogacar, on the other hand, wins in every thinkable terrain, on any thinkable parcours, and he does so attacking from 50-80 kilometers out, and when he crosses the line he looks like he just came home from a Sunday ride. This guy is Eddy Merckx, Bernard Hinault territory, which in my opinion, is a far worse sign for the credibility of this sport than another "run-off-the-mill" GC specialist. Because Pogi is essentially replicating feats from a long-gone time when cycling was not a borderline scientific field with marginal gains.
If you want some statistics for reference, Vingegaard is currently having a career-best season in terms of win percentage. He has six race victories (in other words, not counting GC wins) in 30 race days putting him at a 20 percent win rate. This will certainly drop. Again, this, a 20 percent win rate, is Vingegaard's best season ever. Pogacar's career (!!!) win rate is better than this at 21 percent. 65 race victories in 314 race days. This season, he is peaking out at 33 percent with 15 race victories in 46 race days.
I know that Vingegaard's incredible climbing performances raise a lot of eyebrows, but at least he can be said to be a highly specialized rider. Imagine, on the other hand, if Contador had been matching Hushovd in classics sprints, dropping Cancellara on the cobbles, and then climbing better than Schleck. That's what Pogacar is, that's what Pogacar does. It's simply not believable.