I don't know what you're fussing about. Another poster suggested that I should compare Pogacar's results with those of Remco, Seixas and Widar, so I did. Not sure how Australia fits into the picture, but the fact that he was born in January is definitely an advantage, as he was older than his opponents. There's nothing wrong with competing against juniors at the age of 18. But why is the poster trying to make it seem more valuable than an elite race, or more challenging than riding a 14km climb with someone who finished in the top five in a Grand Tour?
Andy Schleck joined Riis's CSC team at the age of 19. The sooner you enter a professional environment, the sooner you will fulfil your potential. I think it's just that simple.
It's no coincidence that many riders have performed at such a high level at such a young age in recent years. This is because teams have started investing in development teams.
There's a guy in my local area who is on one of the best WT team's development teams this year. Last year, he was on a local-ish conti team. He said there's a huge difference, in terms of recovery, as he gets to sleep in a hotel after races instead of having to drive for hours to get home. Everything is taken care of for him: food, nutrients, expensive training camps at high altitude etc.. He doesn't have to worry about anything except training, racing, and recovery.
There is no question that Seixas is a mega talent, the best in his age group, and will likely continue to improve. But I bet he is much closer to his maximum potential than 18yo Pogacar was when he was racing for a low-end Slovenian conti team.