Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 121 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Lee Sweeney, physiologist at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine, who's also director of the University of Florida's Myology Institute.
Thanks. There was one Weber mentioned in the post. As the context is cycling, I immediately though of Sebastian.
With regards to the Pog versus Vinge (quasi moral) debate regarding which one we support, i.e. considering we heavily suspect both are more than a little delving into the dark arts of performance enhancement, a parallel could be drawn back to the 1990's when Pantani was popular... & certain cyborgs weren't.

Vingegaard is a cyborg. He's the clinical product of Jumbo Visma's need to micromanage the Tour de France to a maniacal degree. He's basically the 'human' embodiment of their team car in the peloton. They say jump, Vinge says how high. Rog was decommissioned as their leader in the Tour because he's precisely too unpredictable (blows hot & cold) & has moments of no risk, no glory which give the DS's jitters. Some people don't notice this (or haven't been following Jumbo Visma closely enough) & fall for the 'marketing' which paints Vingegaard as a model father & an introvert. But honestly, there's nothing anywhere near as deep going on there, i.e. it's just Vingegaard following numbers on his bike computer & doing exactly what Grischa tells him to do. Froome-esque.

Pog on the other hand... has some Pantani in him. And he looks better & more natural on a bike as well. The aesthetics are definitely in Pog's favor & yes, it matters. I mean what's with Vinge also constantly staring at Pog to the extent he'll give himself whiplash? Even French Eurosport (Jacky Durand) noticed this & thought it was weird.

People are free to pick & choose who they support (obviously) but tant qu’à faire (aka whilst we're at it) I'd rather support the rider who comes across as an actual thoroughbred instead of a machine.

Just my opinion.
Yeah, I too prefer Mr. Giannetti's wild entrepreneurial spirit and doer attitude towards blood doping to anything that gives a more calculated impression.

E: Note to self: never do sarcasm online.
 
Last edited:
With regards to the Pog versus Vinge (quasi moral) debate regarding which one we support, i.e. considering we heavily suspect both are more than a little delving into the dark arts of performance enhancement, a parallel could be drawn back to the 1990's when Pantani was popular... & certain cyborgs weren't.

Vingegaard is a cyborg. He's the clinical product of Jumbo Visma's need to micromanage the Tour de France to a maniacal degree. He's basically the 'human' embodiment of their team car in the peloton. They say jump, Vinge says how high. Rog was decommissioned as their leader in the Tour because he's precisely too unpredictable (blows hot & cold) & has moments of no risk, no glory which give the DS's jitters. Some people don't notice this (or haven't been following Jumbo Visma closely enough) & fall for the 'marketing' which paints Vingegaard as a model father & an introvert. But honestly, there's nothing anywhere near as deep going on there, i.e. it's just Vingegaard following numbers on his bike computer & doing exactly what Grischa tells him to do. Froome-esque.

Pog on the other hand... has some Pantani in him. And he looks better & more natural on a bike as well. The aesthetics are definitely in Pog's favor & yes, it matters. I mean what's with Vinge also constantly staring at Pog to the extent he'll give himself whiplash? Even French Eurosport (Jacky Durand) noticed this & thought it was weird.

People are free to pick & choose who they support (obviously) but tant qu’à faire (aka whilst we're at it) I'd rather support the rider who comes across as an actual thoroughbred instead of a machine.

Just my opinion.
Ah, but Pog is no Pantani, who was laiden with a melancholic and hence tragic nature. With Pantani you got pathos. I don't get that from Pogacar, just brazenness. And Pantani had a Picassoesque aesthetic on the bike. An air of cubismo. It's not for everybody, but, like Guernica, was sensational to behold. To me, Pog looks comical while riding, in the sense that he literally looks funny whilst peddling. All that strange bobbing left to right. It's like he's dancing at a frat party! I agree, however, with what you say about Vingeggard and his avuncular demeanor. It's mumbo-jumbo propaganda, although I do get the sense he is meak. By contrast, with Pog's projected good grandson profile, I perceive something diabolical behind the facade.

But, as you say, just my opinion.
 
Last edited:
It's seems UAE aren't trailing behind JV in the arms race this year. Even Yates is a Tour podium candidate while being a super-dom. Both mutants and teams are looking equally impressive (they are able to drop the rest while riding 2+2) but the third week will give us the definite answer who is the stronger and better prepared.
 
Pogacar's doping annoys the hell out of me because of the ridiculous nature of his win on Planche des Belles Filles. Roglic had a huge time advantage going into that (yes, I know Roglic was doping too). At the end of that TT, Roglic looked physically dead, like he needed medical assistance. Pogacar looked like had just been out for a casual walk, and he could have gone on for another hour without breaking a sweat. It was beyond a farce.

Last year, JV jumped Pogacar on one stage, gained a bunch of time, and then every stage after that, Pogacar finished ahead of JV, but TP could never quite recoup all the time. (Yes, I know that JV is doping too). TP pretending to attack JV in the Paris finale last year was a total douche move, no other way to spin that.

This year is pretty much the same script as last year. JV somehow gained time on TP on one stage, and then every other stage since, TP finishes ahead but can't quite gain all the time back (yet).

My question is, we still have an individual TT left. Shouldn't TP be able to blow JV away in that? I mean, they are fighting for a second in the mountains, but in the ITT, TP could put a minute into JV based on what we saw on PdBF before. I imagine TP will take the yellow after the ITT, and that will be the end of race.

All in all, cycling has become a total farce yet again. Why would any other team bother to waste a GC guy in a grand state race if TP or JV are in the race? If they aren't going to stop the obvious doping of UAE and Jumbo, then I guess I hope the other teams develop a doping program such that TP doesn't easily win every major race by a stupid margin.

Disclaimer: Yes, I hate Pogacar. I find him blatant and arrogant with his doping to a level that we haven't seen since Lance Armstrong.
You missed the entire Sky dynasty? Wiggo, Froome, Thomas?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DrSahl
Ah, but Pog is no Pantani, who was laiden with a melancholic and hence tragic nature. With Pantani you got pathos. I don't get that from Pogacar, just brazenness. And Pantani had a Picassoesque aesthetic on the bike. An air of cubismo. It's not for everybody, but, like Guernica, was sensational to behold. To me, Pog looks comical while riding, in the sense that he literally looks funny whilst peddling. All that strange bobbing left to right. It's like he's dancing at a frat party! I agree, however, with what you say about Vingeggard and his avuncular demeanor. It's mumbo-jumbo propaganda, although I do get the sense he is meak. By contrast, with Pog's projected good grandson profile, I perceive something diabolical behind the facade.

But, as you say, just my opinion.
I cannot say for sure that Jonas doesn't have dark triad traits but to my eyes everything about him screams neurodiversity over the dark triad. I agree about "meak". Pog on the other hand the opposite; he does come off as on the dark triad.

The "tragic guy" in my eyes is Roglic. To me he comes off as similar to a comedian (old arcticle linked) He's now stuck in a role where he has to always be happy. That's the persona he - or possibly his team - cultivated for himself. There's also a madness in him that absolutely won't just be there without consequences for his mental life overall. That's my two cents. I love him though <3

All three of them though seems to like the game of toying with their rivals. That in itself is a sign of something :wineglass: :laughing:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Extinction
At least I can keep up with this thread! Honestly, without Vigo, Pogo would be the ultimate doping extra terrestrial. And let's face it, he's a pretty charismatic guy in the media and we all like attacking riders (although the reason they're able to attack their competition so willfully is another story). But today was insane. He smashed everyone, and yet his time was obliterated (so he wasn't going slowly). I mean he wasn't far from being caught FFS
 
At least I can keep up with this thread! Honestly, without Vigo, Pogo would be the ultimate doping extra terrestrial. And let's face it, he's a pretty charismatic guy in the media and we all like attacking riders (although the reason they're able to attack their competition so willfully is another story). But today was insane. He smashed everyone, and yet his time was obliterated (so he wasn't going slowly). I mean he wasn't far from being caught FFS
It's what always bothered me about Jens Voigt...he was likeable and gave us the phrase "Shut up legs," and everyone just fawned over him, even though he was doped to the gills.
 
tour-de-france-2006-stage-17sastre-carlos-schleck-frank-saint-jean-de-maurienne-_-morzine-etape.webp

While we‘re talking about Landis, I fear this is the actual role of Pogačar and Yates, although that‘s underselling how unreal anything Pogačar does, is.
 
Pogacar's doping annoys the hell out of me because of the ridiculous nature of his win on Planche des Belles Filles. Roglic had a huge time advantage going into that (yes, I know Roglic was doping too). At the end of that TT, Roglic looked physically dead, like he needed medical assistance. Pogacar looked like had just been out for a casual walk, and he could have gone on for another hour without breaking a sweat. It was beyond a farce.

Last year, JV jumped Pogacar on one stage, gained a bunch of time, and then every stage after that, Pogacar finished ahead of JV, but TP could never quite recoup all the time. (Yes, I know that JV is doping too). TP pretending to attack JV in the Paris finale last year was a total douche move, no other way to spin that.

This year is pretty much the same script as last year. JV somehow gained time on TP on one stage, and then every other stage since, TP finishes ahead but can't quite gain all the time back (yet).

My question is, we still have an individual TT left. Shouldn't TP be able to blow JV away in that? I mean, they are fighting for a second in the mountains, but in the ITT, TP could put a minute into JV based on what we saw on PdBF before. I imagine TP will take the yellow after the ITT, and that will be the end of race.

All in all, cycling has become a total farce yet again. Why would any other team bother to waste a GC guy in a grand state race if TP or JV are in the race? If they aren't going to stop the obvious doping of UAE and Jumbo, then I guess I hope the other teams develop a doping program such that TP doesn't easily win every major race by a stupid margin.

Disclaimer: Yes, I hate Pogacar. I find him blatant and arrogant with his doping to a level that we haven't seen since Lance Armstrong.
An expert, I see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Didinho