The bold works both ways and strongly suggests you support Vingegaard.It actually does and there is a strong argument for it, but I don't care to make it as effectively I will be arguing for Vingegaard which I don't want to do. Dare I say that the reason you keep making this argument is that it makes you feel better about the rider you support.
The Combloux TT was just 33 minutes duration and Vingegaard pulled out a 98 second gap on 2nd place Pogacar - that's 5% faster! When Miguel Indurain did the "extraterrestrial" Luxemburg TT in 1992, that was less than 4% faster than Armand De Las Cuevas in 2nd.
If posters here were objective I wouldn't bother. Sure this is whataboutism, but what of it. Of course Pogacar is doping but we have been in an obvious arms race between UAE (Pogacar) and Visma (Vingegaard) since the fuse was it at LPdBF. We can't discuss one without also talking about the other rider.
And just to remind, despite all the radioactive performances of Pog in this year's Tour (note objectivity), Vingegaard never collapsed like Pogacar last year and was still strong enough to finish 2nd in the Nice TT - beating Remco. And Vingegaard achieved all this despite his massive crash, serious injuries and 12 days hospitalization in early April. There is the arms race right there.