• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 320 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
You don't think his attack on the Cipressa was strange? No one is saying he's using a massively strong motor, and can just ride away from anyone, anytime, anywhere. There's no reason to rule out the motor just not being strong enough at some points.
I think the climbs were simply not steep enough. A motor advantage is more pronounced with steeper climbs where drafting is much less an advantage to the follower. Also, I had the impression he put a lot if energy in the attacks and in going all out on the flat. Battery depletion may become an issue as well. in any, case you did need a MVDP being at 100% or it was another Pogi show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: E_F_ and Stablo
Right there. That should now settle the issue for good. And not just that. According to his coaches, he is also now doing interval training (can you imagine!) and eating porridge with pancakes for carb sources. That surely should give him a huge advantage on top of that sci-fi scale talent. :)

Yeah, there is that. "A few seconds" as in "the whole season non-stop" of no-sweat smiling moto-speed performances. Also "someone" as in the "the namesake of this very thread". :)
Of course I am very skeptical regarding Pog's performances. But, what you write is neither an argument nor evidence for anything. And that is my problem. It is all zero evidence speculation. Which is quite different to what was happening in the 90s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pastronef
Of course I am very skeptical regarding Pog's performances. But, what you write is neither an argument nor evidence for anything. And that is my problem. It is all zero evidence speculation. Which is quite different to what was happening in the 90s.
Well there's zero evidence for biological doping as well. Is that not happening? Unlike @Casual cyclist I am not convinced, but I don't see the issue in "zero evidence speculation" when there is zero evidence, but it's obvious that something is going on.